Norton AntiVirus 2008 - Efficiency test


Recommended Posts

Before we start off, know that this review isn't about malware detection rates, features or performance. It's about efficiency.

Performance is relative. Whether a product slows down a system largely depends on that particular system. What's more relevant is testing how it compares with other products that offer similar features.

Finally, please don't use this thread for starting yet another flame war, so don't reply with "norton suxx" or "norton roxx" posts. Reply only if you have some valid points/arguments, with proofs to back it up. Posts like "Norton once caught xyz virus that abc AV didn't" (or vice-versa) are meaningless.

--

• Although the NAV 2008 installer was around 58 MB, after installation it went on to use a total of 557 MB disk space! The installation took 20 minutes to complete. The installer was also quite sluggish and it took some time for the program to respond to button clicks. NOD32 on the other hand, was installed and running in less than a minute!

nav2k8xt0.png

The interface, although heavily skinned, was snappy and responsive.

• To get a better picture of NAV 2008's efficiency, I've compared it with an antivirus that's popular for its low resource usage and high detection rates - ESET NOD32 Antivirus. (Rated @ Neowin as the Best Antivirus 2007)

The green bar represents the base system parameters, the blue one with NOD32 installed, and the orange bar represents Norton AntiVirus 2008.

nav2k8chartjp1.gif

• Here's a screenshot of the modules NAV 2008 loads at boot: (Using Microsoft AutoRuns)

nav2k8autorunsol3.gif

Verdict: NAV 2008 is a definite improvement over earlier versions, but still not as lean as other AVs. The good news is that the CPU usage has gone down considerably since the last few editions - so much so that I didn't find much difference in CPU usage levels between NAV and other AV products. If you're a NAV fan and would like to stick to the NAV line, then 2008 is a must-have upgrade.

In my next test, I'll be comparing NAV 2008 with the alleged resource hog, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0. Stay tuned!

In your test what is a "clean system"? That is really vauge.

As far as boot time, are you saying that NAV '08 caused a 6 min boot?

As far as disk usage, how did NAV '08 use almost 2GB of storage? The install only takes half a gig.

------

Why don't you test what services, etc. are necessary instead of Norton bashing here. That way, the people who do use Norton are using it more effectively. We get the goddamn point, that Norton is a bit of a hog, but there are millions of Norton users out there and it remains the best selling AV, so why don't you help them?

In the beginning of your analysis you say that this isn't about performance, its about efficiency. How is this possible, that it is a test of efficiency? It doesn't make sense to say that this doesn't measure performance, because it does. However, this analysis does not measure efficiency. This is because your analysis was done on one system (you say yourself that performance is relative to the owner's computer) and your analysis contains data that affects the performance of a computer. All-in-all, you really make no sense.

I also do not understand how your analysis compares NOD32 and NAV '08. Besides, you give a rehashed screenshot of NAV '08 autoruns, so who is to say that you even did testing with NOD32.

Where are all these numbers coming from!! Back up your own **** before asking others to come in here and debate with proof.

I would really like to see a review of NOD 32 Version 3 when its released. ESET have done a lot right in my view, in the latest beta.

Can you explain the boot time a bit more??

6mins????

Doesn't sound correct.

I found that hard to believe too. I think it may have been on the initial boot after installation. Maybe Nortons was doing some housekeeping?

It would also be helpful if you compared various other AV products and other versions of Norton, that would allow us to see the difference.

Just now all that you've done is compare a program that many expect to use a lot of RAM with the AV program that uses the least. Great job!

Your system specs would also be useful, for all we know, you're running a Pentium 3 system with 256MB RAM.

@ntbnnt:

The "clean system" meant that no additional software was installed on the system. It was a fresh windows install which was slipstreamed with all the latest updates. The disk was defragmented post install and an image was taken of the system. No other software was running while testing the AntiVirus.

As far as boot time, are you saying that NAV '08 caused a 6 min boot?

Yes, the boot time was increased to 6 minutes, from 2. Mind you, this was on a Pentium-III system. I specifically choose to test on an old system, because the Symantec site lists the minimum requirements as a 300 MHz processor with 256 MB RAM.

As far as disk usage, how did NAV '08 use almost 2GB of storage? The install only takes half a gig.

That's the total disk usage after NAV was installed. I did mention in my post that NAV used 557 MB.

Why don't you test what services, etc. are necessary instead of Norton bashing here. That way, the people who do use Norton are using it more effectively. We get the goddamn point, that Norton is a bit of a hog, but there are millions of Norton users out there and it remains the best selling AV, so why don't you help them?

Sure, maybe in another thread, but not here.

@Nighthawk:

This was something I put up in a haste. I will be doing a more comprehensive test soon.

Yes, the boot time was increased to 6 minutes, from 2. Mind you, this was on a Pentium-III system.

LOL, c'mon.. not saying that in your first post was a bit misleading. A difference of 3 minutes on a P3 might be a difference of 15 seconds on modern systems (pure speculation), in which case it wouldn't be doing too badly. I doubt anyone with a P3 would be buying and running NAV08.

i used nod32 as my antivirus for a long period of time and was quite happy with it until i heard that kaspersky had better detection rates. so i got kaspersky and use it...uggh. what a slowdown. i removed it and used norton 360..suprisingly less of a resource hog than kaspersky 7 and had fewer popups (kaspersky always had this thing on the bottom right corner of ur screen saying this registry key changed and this thing is tryna access the internet wat not). then i noticed overtime that norton slowed down my pc the more and more i used it. so i take it out and replace it with zone alarm security suite. this was the most terrible slowdown i had ever experienced. even after defrags it is terrible in performance and takes very long to scan..(i guess not optimized for vista yet-i used it a lot on my xp pc with no problems or noticeable slowdowns).

i needed a good firewall so i decided using comodo instead. unfortunately none of these firewalls allow my pc network configuration to work properly.. ie. connect to the gateway computer or let my 360 connect to pc. now im back to nod32 and windows firewall. my pc is fast as ever. my 360 works with my pc, media center extenders, gateway computer access, password protected file sharing, windows media player media sharing service etc.

if only i can fix vista's network config. my ics connection keeps on showing up as unidentified network and defaults to public after every restart.

LOL, c'mon.. not saying that in your first post was a bit misleading. A difference of 3 minutes on a P3 might be a difference of 15 seconds on modern systems (pure speculation), in which case it wouldn't be doing too badly. I doubt anyone with a P3 would be buying and running NAV08.

oh I can guarantee you people would and are buying that and putting it on a PIII with 256 megs of ram

I can second that. Two words

Old People, my grandpa loves running norton on his 600 Mhz celeron 128 mb ram compaq

ya, they buy Norton and they are proud of it... when ever I ask which anti virus they have they say Norton..... and I usually say "Oh" (my voice usually sounds not very excited and somewhat disappointed) ..when what I really want to say is "I'm sorry". This last month I've been turning people over to nod32.

lol, don't they notice the slow-down? Why not just stick with an old copy of Norton? Actually, if all they've ever ran is Norton, then they probably think that their computer is actually that slow, and has nothing to do with Norton.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!