Recommended Posts

Even if he is announced to still be in the cast doesn't mean he is 'alive' on the show.

Yep. Ian summerhaller (boone) was in the cast notes on "do no harm" one eppsode after he died

That was "Busted" by Mythbusters, a sinking ship will NOT pull you under.

who says? The force of the watter pulling in will suck you down with the ship..... cuz the ship had a huge hole in it, whitch caused it to sink and anything remaining on the ship to be pulled down....

i have to say that this finale did not fell like lost at all, it was dark and totally diferent from the past.....

I also wonder the fate of desomand. I wonder if charles knew he was on "his" island and that he came back. Would he give des a shot with pen, perhaps to save her from ben? Or will he kill him or send him back to the island. could he have sent pen and des to the island and that comment "you'll never find her" mean the island?

I hope des makes it to the end

Yes, it is possible he lived. Michael is dead, however.

Locke is also dead. The future is the future, not a possible future. But don't worry, he'll be alive through probably all of S5, and killed in the S5 finale.

I know this will sound crazy, but hear me out on this.

When I was looking at some of the screen captures of Locke in the coffin, I didn't see the scar under his right eye. Now that could of course be the angle of the camera, makeup, lighting, etc., but it got me wondering if this is actually someone else.

I can't imagine who and why it looks like Locke, but just a possibility I'm throwing out there. I am, after all, running on very little sleep the last 72 hours, so it could also be in my head :p

I know this will sound crazy, but hear me out on this.

When I was looking at some of the screen captures of Locke in the coffin, I didn't see the scar under his right eye. Now that could of course be the angle of the camera, makeup, lighting, etc., but it got me wondering if this is actually someone else.

I can't imagine who and why it looks like Locke, but just a possibility I'm throwing out there. I am, after all, running on very little sleep the last 72 hours, so it could also be in my head :p

Morticians cover scars and stuff for funerals.

There were two rabbits in the Swan orientation video mishap, so the possibility of one being Locke Locke and the other being.... other Locke, could still be there; that's assuming Locke does whatever Hallawax/Candle did to make two bunnies.

One other note: before finally seeing that Ben did in fact travel through time to the future, his situation was different from Desmond's. Desmond's time travel was mental, while Ben's was physical. It's possible, though unlikely, that when Ben moved the wheel to move the island, that a double was made of him, one on the island, another in the Sahara, but I don't see that being the case.

also this flash forward took place in april 2007

Pretty sure the 'We have to go back!' was August 07, and by the end, its later than that. Remember, Kate said 'I've been trying for three years to forget what happened the day we left." Now, that doesn't mean it has to be exactly three years -- Jan 08 -- but it certainly means more than, say, two and a half, which would be summer 07.

There were two rabbits in the Swan orientation video mishap, so the possibility of one being Locke Locke and the other being.... other Locke, could still be there; that's assuming Locke does whatever Hallawax/Candle did to make two bunnies.

One other note: before finally seeing that Ben did in fact travel through time to the future, his situation was different from Desmond's. Desmond's time travel was mental, while Ben's was physical. It's possible, though unlikely, that when Ben moved the wheel to move the island, that a double was made of him, one on the island, another in the Sahara, but I don't see that being the case.

Yup, Ben time traveled right from the frozen donkey wheel in Jan 05 to the Sahara desert in Oct 05.

I know this will sound crazy, but hear me out on this.

When I was looking at some of the screen captures of Locke in the coffin, I didn't see the scar under his right eye. Now that could of course be the angle of the camera, makeup, lighting, etc., but it got me wondering if this is actually someone else.

I can't imagine who and why it looks like Locke, but just a possibility I'm throwing out there. I am, after all, running on very little sleep the last 72 hours, so it could also be in my head :p

The 'doppleganger' theory is interesting, and it would explain why Locke left the island. I couldn't see him doing so willingly, unless he was told to by say, Jacob. But if its the scars that you think prove this, you're missing something. Something that creates a duplicate would also duplicate the scars. Remember, the duplicate bunny had the number painted, and that was just painted on.

Maybe that's the reason he can never go back. Like the duplicate bunnies, who can't be close to each other.

I think Ben said the person can't go back because the island wouldn't want him back. I'll be pretty mad though if the Oceanic Six + Locke go back and Ben doesn't go with them. By the way, does anyone think they have to bring Lapidus and Walt and Desmond too?

One other thing, on the frozen donkey wheel... is the 'teleporting' random, or is each position on the wheel a different place for the island to go. Meaning, basically, there are eight possible locations for the island.

Edited by episode
Anybody knows what Song/Artist was Jack listening to in the truck..... when he goes to that coffin place
"Gouge Away": Jack is listening to this Pixies song on the way back to the funeral home. Pixies singer Black Francis was born on April 6th, the date after Jack's newspaper was published. The Pixies were also a favorite band of Nirvana singer Kurt Cobain, whose song Scentless Apprentice was played in Jack's first visit to the funeral home in Through the Looking Glass. Gouge Away is the 15th song on the album Doolittle.(Music)
I don't know, it just seems right. After all, Charlotte decided to stay on the island and find her place of birth.

The daughter idea is an interesting theory. Ben might not know about having a daughter, that's possible. But I doubt that is Annie.

The actress is not even 30 year who plays Charlotte, so I'm assuming the character is around the same age (25-30). Michael Emerson is 54, so I think we can safely say that the character is around that age as well.

The daughter idea is an interesting theory. Ben might not know about having a daughter, that's possible. But I doubt that is Annie.

The actress is not even 30 year who plays Charlotte, so I'm assuming the character is around the same age (25-30). Michael Emerson is 54, so I think we can safely say that the character is around that age as well.

Exactly, which is why we can safely assume that Charlotte is NOT Annie, even though the finale heavily alluded to some form of past on the island.

Not to mention, there is a striking resemblance.

Well her being to young certainly one point to be made, but what about the fact that Ben would have known that when he outed who she was to the group going to the Barracks?

There's some kind of tie to the island and possibly Dharma from her brief flashback scene and the discussion she had with Miles and then with Daniel. With that said, Ben got his information from Michael, so it's possible that some of what Michael found in her background information was forged.

The daughter idea is an interesting theory. Ben might not know about having a daughter, that's possible. But I doubt that is Annie.

The actress is not even 30 year who plays Charlotte, so I'm assuming the character is around the same age (25-30). Michael Emerson is 54, so I think we can safely say that the character is around that age as well.

Ben was born in the early 60s, so he's pushing 50. Locke won't even reach 54 with his death in 2007 (born in 56)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!