New Chinese Involvement Could Trigger HD DVD Price Plunge


Recommended Posts

In September 2005, as first reported by CDRInfo, the DVD Forum began talks with China's Optical Memory National Engineering Research Center about the possibility of that country's manufacturers being able to build optical drive components that are essentially HD DVD players, but not really.

Meaning, they would be just close enough to being HD DVD players that, if manufacturers wanted to go ahead and call them so, they could - by just paying the license fee. Or, as Chinese officials put it, they could opt to save as much as $1 billion per year collectively and not pay the license fee, if manufacturers were happy producing goods for consumption in China only.

It would save China the expense of developing its own format, which is something it did consider in the form of something called Enhanced Versatile Disc.

The result of that collaboration is the CH-DVD format, announced this morning. The HD DVD Promotions Group trumpeted the news in a message to BetaNews this afternoon. "This is great for the HD DVD camp," the spokesperson said, "since product developers do not have to start from scratch and can achieve shorter development times. The more drives that are made, the cheaper it is to make HD DVD players across the board."

The new Chinese consortium did its own trumpeting, though with a decidedly more formal tone: "The emergence of CH-DVD as a high definition format integrating Chinese-owned intellectual property clearly demonstrates that a Chinese optical disc technology is already at the world-class level. In the near future, all related industries in China are expected to make the transition from standard definition DVD to high definition DVD."

http://www.betanews.com/article/New_Chines...ge/1189196071/2

Btw, just people's information these Chinese players are already ready and kicking:

Four large CHINA CE manufacturers set out the CHINA Version HD DVD Player, it base on the TOSHIBA HD-A3, but use the different modulate code(FSM).

The four CHINA CE manufacturers are:

BBK(OPPO)

Haier

TCL

Tsinghua Tongfang

The detailed report (if you can read Chinese):

http://stor-age.zdnet.com.cn/stor-age/2007/0907/495415.shtml

Also, pay attention that the last 2 models are actually HD DVD. All pumped and ready to launch! LOL

bbk.jpgTCL.jpg

Haier.jpg

QHTF.jpg

Edited by Boz

Okay, I know China is a big market, but I fail so see how this is good news for the HD-DVD camp? I mean, if they don't pay any licensing fee, they can't export those player anywhere else.

Four large CHINA CE manufacturers set out the CHINA Version HD DVD Player, it base on the TOSHIBA HD-A3, but use the different modulate code(FSM).

It use a different modulate code? Does this means that it's incompatible with HD-DVD movies? China will have to produce their own CH-DVD movies? Nothing to help lower the cost of production....

It use a different modulate code? Does this means that it's incompatible with HD-DVD movies? China will have to produce their own CH-DVD movies? Nothing to help lower the cost of production....

The CH-DVD players will be able to play HD DVDs, but HD DVD players will not be able to play CH-DVDs (without additional software).

The Forum has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with China's Optical Memory National Engineering Research Centre (OMNERC) regarding licensing of the HD DVD-ROM China (formerly HD DVD-ROM China-only) format, specification for which was approved earlier this year. The only difference between the latter and the standard HD DVD format is the modulation scheme: the optical pickup in HD DVD China player will be able to play standard HD DVD discs, although Chinese discs will not be playable in standard HD DVD drives. According to the Forum, the Chinese government is keen to introduce the format domestically before the Olympic Games in August 2008. Large-scale integrates (LSIs) are already under development by manufacturers and use of AACS for the format is currently under negotiation.

Source: Screen Digest

I suppose that's good and all, but how long before we see the "Recall: HD-DVD Players Produced In China With Life Threatening Agents" news showing it's ugly face?

The Chinese are known for their cheap products, but one can't help but think what garbage is imported from that country to around the world sometimes. And the design? No thanks, but you get what you pay for... or that's how the saying goes.

Here's to hoping this works out for the HD-DVD camp. :beer:

^^ LMAO.

I like most of those designs, honestly. And I've had Haier products before and they've done fine. It's funny how you determine something is "garbage" simply because it's not on your side.

Like I've said, whichever format goes to sub-$100 first gets my buck.

The CH-DVD players will be able to play HD DVDs, but HD DVD players will not be able to play CH-DVDs (without additional software).

Source: Screen Digest

So year old rumors are correct, China is pioneering its own variant of HD storage. I wonder if Hollywood titles will "legally" appear on these discs or if its meant for the local industry.

^^ LMAO.

I like most of those designs, honestly. And I've had Haier products before and they've done fine. It's funny how you determine something is "garbage" simply because it's not on your side.

Like I've said, whichever format goes to sub-$100 first gets my buck.

Don't be so quick to judge. I could care a less if this article was about HD-DVD or Blu-ray players. What is funny is that maybe you're actually ashamed of the truth behind players priced below $100. Sure it may work okay and have your standard features and hook it up to your no-name 25" LCD, but isn't the whole point behind HD is being able to "experience it in all it's glory" ... "The look and sound of perfect" ... and so forth? You can be assured players priced below that range, especially this early in the game, will lack features and build quality that some of us desire. Cutting corners results in fractional costs for reason.

Call me crazy, but there are plenty of us out there that are electronics and A/V nuts. Hell, aren't most people looking for the best they can buy with their budget? If everybody's budget in the world was that of being able to only afford sub-$100 Chinese players, HD wouldn't be so "HD" would it?

Nobody said keeping up with technology was cheap... and anybody would be a fool to think otherwise.

I'm really not choosing any side here, just stating to the masses that it is pretty silly to moan about pricing when this whole format ordeal has just kicked off. We've really got to give it time to settle... much like DVD had to. Only then will prices go down on the hardware and software. Oh, and competition helps too. ;)

Don't be so quick to judge. I could care a less if this article was about HD-DVD or Blu-ray players. What is funny is that maybe you're actually ashamed of the truth behind players priced below $100. Sure it may work okay and have your standard features and hook it up to your no-name 25" LCD, but isn't the whole point behind HD is being able to "experience it in all it's glory" ... "The look and sound of perfect" ... and so forth? You can be assured players priced below that range, especially this early in the game, will lack features and build quality that some of us desire. Cutting corners results in fractional costs for reason.

Call me crazy, but there are plenty of us out there that are electronics and A/V nuts. Hell, aren't most people looking for the best they can buy with their budget? If everybody's budget in the world was that of being able to only afford sub-$100 Chinese players, HD wouldn't be so "HD" would it?

Nobody said keeping up with technology was cheap... and anybody would be a fool to think otherwise.

I'm really not choosing any side here, just stating to the masses that it is pretty silly to moan about pricing when this whole format ordeal has just kicked off. We've really got to give it time to settle... much like DVD had to. Only then will prices go down on the hardware and software. Oh, and competition helps too. ;)

Tell me: do you own a top-of-the-line DVD player, or do you own a cheap one that you couldn't care less about the loading speed or features? NO ONE CARES. As long as it plays HD DVDs, no one will care. Same with Blu-Ray players. If they release one for $100 that plays all Blu-Ray movies, no one is going to care that it doesn't have a super-duper 9 teraflop load module with a tinker gidget. People are going to buy whichever is cheaper (or, in the case of the PS3, what's already available to them).

HD is HD. I don't think you understand that. It's still high-definition. All these other features like internet connectivity and all that the average consumer isn't going to care about.

And you're not choosing a side? Your posts have told me otherwise. lol

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!