13 Reasons Why Linux Won't Make It To A Desktop Near You


Recommended Posts

13 reasons why Linux won't make it to a desktop near you

by Kim Brebach

You're a marketer who finds an exciting new product developed by some really smart people. A great product few people have heard of is the Holy Grail of marketing -- all you have to do is tell everyone about it, and the world will beat a path to your door.

Isn't that the theory?

When you look more closely, you find it's not that simple. In fact, you find a set of insurmountable obstacles. Here's a short list:

1. The people who make the product have no money for marketing.

2. The reason they have no money is that they give the product away.

3. Since they give the product away, people never see it in shops.

4. Because people never see the product in shops or adverstised, they don't know it exists.

5. The makers of the product rely on word of mouth to attract more customers, but their customers only talk to each other.

6. On closer inspection, you find that there are 500 versions of the product. When you try to understand the subtle differences between them, you become confused. Your enthusiasm starts to flag.

7. When you install the product and try to use it, you strike unexpected problems. You also find some nice surprises, which boosts your flagging enthusiasm a little.

8. When you ask the product's maker for help, he suggests you talk to other users. They welcome you with open arms but answer your questions in a strange language.

9. When you admit that you have trouble understanding their language, you're told you'd better learn it, or you won't appreciate the product.

10. When you tell the designers that their product isn't marketable in its present form, they say that's okay, since they only wrote it to share with their friends.

11. As you wonder what to make of it all, you watch the designers and their supporters squabble among themselves over all kinds of trivia. As you realize that their collective focus isn't on fighting their real competitors, what's left of your enthusiasm ebbs further away.

12. When you ask the people in charge why they don't show more leadership, they say they have no power to unite the squabbling communities. They add that disagreement and vigorous debate were the very fires that forged the great product in the first place.

13. When you discover that some of the designers have made deals with their biggest competitor, the last drop of your enthusiasm drains away.

source and full article

I think that the first two points are slightly invalid. Look at Redhat and Novell. Too rather large players in the Linux world with commercially available and free products. They obviously have money backing. But it would seem accurate to say there is very little marketing involved. Anyone else have any ideas?

Further into the article, the author talks about the countless distros, WMs and everything else to choose from. I think we should start an ultimate newbie guide with info about the most common distros WMs, etc and provide tips to help users choose which is right for them. Then maybe part of the problem would disappear.

He also mentions vendors like IBM will soon follow Dell's footsteps in providing Linux on their machines and this just might also give a great boost in the market side of things.

You're a marketer who finds an exciting new product developed by some really smart people. A great product few people have heard of is the Holy Grail of marketing -- all you have to do is tell everyone about it, and the world will beat a path to your door.

Isn't that the theory?

No. It isn't. The writer fails already. I think Linux is marketed perfectly fine. It seems that the writer is just jumping on the bandwagon with everyone else. We get it. Linux is not ready for the desktop - for the average Joe Schmoe and I really don't think Mr. Schmoe cares.

Let us not turn this into yet another Linux vs. Windows bashing thread. Choose the OS you like and be happy. Then let others do the same.

Thank you for your attention.

Can't all of those points be answered with Red Hat and SuSE?

No. I do a lot of surfing on tech sites (mostly here on Neowin) and I get out and the only thing I know about Red Hat or SuSE is that they exist and are purportedly good. They just aren't marketed in any way that would appeal to the majority of the market. I doubt the majority of people know they exist.

-Spenser

Let us not turn this into yet another Linux vs. Windows bashing thread. Choose the OS you like and be happy. Then let others do the same.

Thank you for your attention.

OT: Isn't in pronoucned "lin-nucks" (lin to rhyme with win) and not "lee-nucks"?

OT: Isn't in pronoucned "lin-nucks" (lin to rhyme with win) and not "lee-nucks"?

Well, Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux pronounces it "Leenooks" (or "lean-ooks" where the first part rhymes with "dean").

http://suseroot.com/about-suse-linux/how-d...ounce-linux.php

post-34335-1189624578.jpg

Linus Torvalds

No. I do a lot of surfing on tech sites (mostly here on Neowin) and I get out and the only thing I know about Red Hat or SuSE is that they exist and are purportedly good. They just aren't marketed in any way that would appeal to the majority of the market. I doubt the majority of people know they exist.

-Spenser

Red Hat is marketed toward businesses, as is SuSE by Novell and both of them do an excellent job. They're not being marketed toward the desktop user.

Ummm... Linux made it to my desktop about 4 years ago, and hasn't been removed. I dual-booted about 6 months, and have been 100% Linux ever since.

Linux has made it onto other people's computers, some to just look at and remove, and other to keep. I have no deeply vested interest in seeing Linux on any particular number of desktops, as long as it serves me well. :yes:

As for the points:

1. The people who make the product have no money for marketing.

2. The reason they have no money is that they give the product away.

3. Since they give the product away, people never see it in shops.

4. Because people never see the product in shops or adverstised, they don't know it exists.That may be a roadblock for some people, but those who are interested in an alternative to Microsoft enough to find out how to burn a CD pass the first "test" in Linux. With few pre-install options, and such a low marketshare, Linux isn't quite ready to be an alternative to those who buy a PC and want their Windows. Linux is just a kernel, it has no desire to take over the world. Linus Torvalds doesn't have the goal of Microsoft destruction. He just wants to keep working on the kernel to make it better. If the whole product (a distro like Red Hat, Ubuntu or something else) is acceptable to some computer users currently using Windows, then great! If not, no biggie.

5. The makers of the product rely on word of mouth to attract more customers, but their customers only talk to each other.Oh, there's plenty of obnoxious people who troll "use Linux" in enough Windows threads. :rolleyes: But these are not the ambassadors that Linux needs.

6. On closer inspection, you find that there are 500 versions of the product. When you try to understand the subtle differences between them, you become confused. Your enthusiasm starts to flag.Ahhh... The "Choice is bad" fallacy. The choices are already out there. If you do not make a choice, you get Windows (pre-installed on somewhere around 95% of all desktops sold). So, the choice is being made, even if all the options are known. Plus, there are only about 5 leading commonly-recommended distros, so anyone using the "500" number is being a bit disingenuous.

7. When you install the product and try to use it, you strike unexpected problems. You also find some nice surprises, which boosts your flagging enthusiasm a little.Yse. It is different. If you expect "Windows", you will run into things that don't make sense. But there are a lot of nice things that I believe that Linux does better at (package management is #1, in my book).

8. When you ask the product's maker for help, he suggests you talk to other users. They welcome you with open arms but answer your questions in a strange language.If you buy your Linux with support, you don't get questions rejected and pushed to forums or IRC as your support venue. And the "strange language" is only due to unfamiliarity. Many Windows users would ask why they are opening regedit and deleting or adding cryptic keys.

9. When you admit that you have trouble understanding their language, you're told you'd better learn it, or you won't appreciate the product.If you don't know how to work a product (Linux, Windows, whatever), then when you run into problems, of course you will have problems. And, of course you will be better served if you took a little time to learn.

10. When you tell the designers that their product isn't marketable in its present form, they say that's okay, since they only wrote it to share with their friends.Or you find an alternative. If you don't like Fluxbox, use XFCE, or Gnome or KDE. If you don't like Windows, and you call Microsoft requesting a change, you get... what?

11. As you wonder what to make of it all, you watch the designers and their supporters squabble among themselves over all kinds of trivia. As you realize that their collective focus isn't on fighting their real competitors, what's left of your enthusiasm ebbs further away.Yes, if you look for it, you can subscribe to the mailing lists of different software developers.

12. When you ask the people in charge why they don't show more leadership, they say they have no power to unite the squabbling communities. They add that disagreement and vigorous debate were the very fires that forged the great product in the first place.KDE, Gnome, XFCE and Fluxbox should all unite? Kill off all alternatives except for one? No thank you.

13. When you discover that some of the designers have made deals with their biggest competitor, the last drop of your enthusiasm drains away.I think the original writer mean that "some corporations have made deals...". If that is what is driving you to linux... If a hatred of Microsoft is the driving force, then what are they going back to? Windows? I guess OSX would be prefect. Oh, Apple has business ties to Microsoft too, even so far as to have a supported MS Office product! Oh, noes!!!11eleven Where will the Microsoft haters go now? (truth is, there is no need to hate Microsoft, jest because you prefer a different OS. Plus hatred of product A is a terrible reason to use product B)

Where's markjensen,i thought he was among the first to respond this thread
I was at work. Thanks for worrying about me.
Ok, what about Ubuntu? You can purchase CDs and tech support :) and it's going to really big places!

Ubuntus corporate support is.. not on the map. If you want to see proper corporate support, you ring Novell or IBM.?

Ubuntus corporate support is.. not on the map. If you want to see proper corporate support, you ring Novell or IBM.

But they'd probably tell you to go to hell with regards to your Ubuntu setup.

This isn't about corporate support anyway, this is about home computer support.

Sorry to give the troll some *shinies* but...

OpenGL much?

I know what OpenGL is. I actually designed my college Senior Design project in it. But when was the last time you saw a majority of main-stream, quality videogames use OpenGL instead of Direct X? Sure one or two games every now and then will have the option to run in OpenGL, but Direct X is still the leading technology.

This semester when I came into Texas A&M, I was the most suprised by the fact that every math lab computer runs SuSE, and I can assume every computer within the engineering department does also.

I had used redhat once prior to coming here, and I've heard all about how domination linux is except for the one thing that has kept me away from it, technical support. Neowin has a forum for support that is minimal due to the fact that very few authoritive answers can be given due to the open source nature of the product, yet the part about it being open source is the most favored feature.

Linux will get its recognition where needed, and it will get its use where it is needed. The developers know this, and thus don't even need to push it.

Everyone makes things too complicated, just let it be, just let it grow.

I know what OpenGL is. I actually designed my college Senior Design project in it. But when was the last time you saw a majority of main-stream, quality videogames use OpenGL instead of Direct X? Sure one or two games every now and then will have the option to run in OpenGL, but Direct X is still the leading technology.

Because Windows is the leading OS, not because it's superior

This isn't about corporate support anyway, this is about home computer support.

Perhaps but at the end of the day what wins the place at the office eventually tends to lead into homes as well if the price range is right.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!