13 Reasons Why Linux Won't Make It To A Desktop Near You


Recommended Posts

I just want to say that Ubuntu Linux is here to stay on my laptop. My cousin wants it installed, and I'll do that in a few months when I next see her. My grandfather wants it on his computer, and I'll do that, well, when I can. My grandmother wants a new laptop and wants me to order a Linux one, she's is so impressed with mine (I told her I'd get her a Dell with Ubuntu).

I think Linux will win out because of all the cool things it is and can do: as someone has noted here. Think about it in big terms however you like, but the real revolution is coming, and it's coming from the average user who is fed up with the status quo and anxious for something better. :D

Because Windows is the leading OS, not because it's superior

QFT

Anyway, I use Linux on a regular basis and I know many other that do, too. While not everyone right now is ready, I believe it will prove a viable alternative for many in the future.

I'm soo eager to reply but some moderators think that I'll be doing "evil" because I'm against "something" and my sig has something to do with it *Sighs*.

Well, now I am interested! *Waits* lol. :)

I think for people who does not know about the dangerous of having a virus or spyware and visiting unknown websites that can install malicious code into the OS, I am talking about people like our parents or grand parents. I think Linux offer a good alternative for these kind of people, I am glad that my mother is in this category and she is happy using without any issue Ubuntu all the time

Well, Linus Torvalds, the creator of Linux pronounces it "Leenooks" (or "lean-ooks" where the first part rhymes with "dean").

http://suseroot.com/about-suse-linux/how-d...ounce-linux.php

post-34335-1189624578.jpg

Linus Torvalds

Yeah, but didn't he then turn around and say that he preferred the "lin" (win) version? I mean, that's what this website is telling me and it's how I've heard most people pronounce it (I used to pronounce it line-nux lol) but perhaps you can fill me in on the truth? lol

/ˈlɪnʌks/ (?linnuks?)

This is now Linus Torvalds? preferred pronunciation, as he considers /ɪ/ closer to the original /ɪː/ than /aɪ/. It also follows the pronunciation of the English word ?linen?.

I think one of the main reasons Linux isn't going to make it onto the desktop anytime soon is that people want to buy a computer and programs and they just 'work'- nothing special to be done. Most people don't care about X-servers and *.conf, root, /usr, etc. because in the past (mostly since computers hit the living room in the late 80's), you just turn them on and they work and that is what people have heard and expect. There's an old axiom that a computer program is only as good as its programmer(s). Society, mainly as a whole, likes instant gratification and Linux does not provide that, for the most part, unless the computer manufacturer goes through the trouble ahead of time.

I've come across a few situations where people download a version of Linux, burn the disc(s), and wipe their drive of all traces of Windows. They then follow the setup program and something isn't working. They know they can get online and join one of many fora and get help, but when that something that doesn't work is the network adapter or video card things go downhill very fast. From that standpoint/perspective, the computer has to be sold with Linux pre-configured, since the majority of people don't want to muck with it just to make it work. Yeah, there are the techies that like to fiddle this and that but most people don't want to fiddle. Even if they buy a boxed product from a brick-and-mortar store, being told that they have to call a toll-free number to fix the problem isn't going to cut the mustard.

Apple has an advantage in the consumer *nix arena since it sells its systems pre-configured in just that way with its version on *nix (a.k.a. MacOS 10.x.x), and has retail as well as corporate support and a significant amount of 'off-the-shelf' programs that work without hassle.

Microsoft has its advantage since hardware manufacturers (read as computer systems makers) really do try to have drivers and such pre-installed and configured (mostly) so all the user has to do is turn it on, type in a name and password and everything somehow works... maybe not with "X" wireless access point or router, but the computer, bought in a box, works (for the most part) without any work on the part of the user.

When WalMart tried its hand at marketing Linspire, it worked for a while because the computers were far less than even the eMachines Windows-installed ones. It didn't last though. Partly because WalMart didn't sell any software for them... partly because the people who bought the cheapest computers didn't know squat (for the most part) about computers... partly because the computers didn't do what the people who bought them wanted them to do... and mainly because the computers were not easy to use when things went wrong, which they did in the hands of inexperienced users.

Most distro's of Linux have their fans because the fans know how to use it... those who had an idea of how to use it before they tried it. Ask yourself how many people you know who only know how to drive an automatic transmission equipped car. Ask yourself how many of those people are scared about driving a stick-shift. Of those people who only know automatics, how many want to drive a stick?

That is the mentality of many desktop users. If it does what I want, the way I want, why should I change?

*edit:

I think I should point out that there were many operating systems available in the '80s for those computers too. And usually it was just booting a 5 1/4" floppy or inserting a cartridge that did the trick.

Edited by cell tech
I think one of the main reasons Linux isn't going to make it onto the desktop anytime soon is that people want to buy a computer and programs and they just 'work'- nothing special to be done. Most people don't care about X-servers and *.conf, root, /usr, etc. because in the past (mostly since computers hit the living room in the late 80's), you just turn them on and they work and that is what people have heard and expect.

...

That is the mentality of many desktop users. If it does what I want, the way I want, why should I change?

While I agree with you that for a majority of people, they use what they think "just works", and their inertia will keep them with what they are familiar with. And that is Windows.

But you have to admit that saying that nothing special has to be done with Windows is also not quite accurate, either. There are several threads on best anti-virus, and best firewall, anti-adware. Businesses are making a killing selling the "clean and tune your PC" service for people that get mucked up and get lost. For these people, Windows isn't the "just works, nothing special to do" OS that you put it forth to be.

To properly administer your PC, you have to know a bit about it and set it up properly and keep it updated. To imply that Windows users don't have to do this to keep a healthy PC isn't right.

And yes, having to install yourself is a big hurdle. Fortunately, there are options - pre-installed with Dell and some others, or have a friend install and configure (which can also be a complex task for certain hardware configurations).

8. When you ask the product's maker for help, he suggests you talk to other users. They welcome you with open arms but answer your questions in a strange language.

does this statement bother anyone else here or is it just me? if you ask a question, you get an answer. if you dont understand the answer, ask for clarification ffs.

I'm soo eager to reply but some moderators think that I'll be doing "evil" because I'm against "something" and my sig has something to do with it *Sighs*.

Well, that wouldn't be me........ ;)

Any fair discussion is fine, as long as there are no attacks on others, for their personal preference.

Ok, what about Ubuntu? You can purchase CDs and tech support :) and it's going to really big places!

Oh yeah! REALLY big places amonst the fanboys!! About those cd's you can purchase(?) If I would've puchased those 10 cd's they sent me way back during the Hoary version, I'd have been one hot person. NONE of the 10 would install. I had to download and burn my own copy to get it to go.

Don't get me wrong, Linux is great, for those that want it. For those that don't want to jump through major hoops, there's Windows.

For Joe Blow everyday user, Linux will never get to the everyday desktop though.

It's being seen on more and more retail systems. I have a Server next to me running Ubuntu. My OS of choice is OS X atm but I am still learning a lot from Linux, most of the things I'm learning are not hard just different then how they are done in Windows. I will admit some things are harder to do in Linux but I still support Linux and think it is great (Y).

Edit: not long till Ubuntu 7.10 and it looks promising :D

you could just short'n the list from 12 down to 1

Distros

if there was just one distro then you would have better hardware, software support and less dependency problems because you would only have one version of Linux to worry about,.

if there was just one distro then you would have better hardware, software support and less dependency problems because you would only have one version of Linux to worry about,.

exactly.

people want linux to become a desktop powerhouse then they need to work together to develope only a few different versions and have the community work on them only.

having a gazillion different versions of basically the same thing is pointless..not to mention useless to the average person.

The opensource community begs to be part of the bigger picture yet can't seem to agree on the right distro to get them there.

'having a gazillion different versions' is what makes each version special. for instance: debian, known to be stable and for those who most likely want a system that works but will sacrifice. arch is a bleeding edge distro for people who want software the minute it is released. gentoo is for people who want complete control over their system. there are different versions for different purposes. kinda like windows xp vs windows server.

'having a gazillion different versions' is what makes each version special.

for who? You want mom and dad to use one version and aunt emma to use another? why can't you just make 1 version that satisfies both people..at the same time.....?

there are different versions for different purposes. kinda like windows xp vs windows server.

it's nothing like windows xp vs. windows server. That's only 2 seperate versions used for 2 entirly different reasons. People using server know what it's for. people using xp probably don't even know about server.

on the other hand, who knows what version of linux works best for what situation.

the opensource community is it's own worst enemy

People using server know what it's for. people using xp probably don't even know about server.
and people using windows probably dont know what linux is for.
2 seperate versions used for 2 entirly different reasons
did you not read what i said about gentoo/arch/debian????

i just dont understand why people bash things until they use it and give it a real chance, not a half assed "i put this cd in my drive and rebooted but its not what i expected" chance. if they did, maybe theyd see the point. if youve already done this, thats great, thanks for trying.

also, you probably use open source software and dont even realize it. the open source community doesnt only consist of people using an os that is 'never going to make it' as a desktop system so at least keep your comments more specific if you choose to continue bashing us.

If I would've puchased those 10 cd's they sent me way back during the Hoary version, I'd have been one hot person. NONE of the 10 would install. I had to download and burn my own copy to get it to go.
Yeah I remember having problems with the first batch I ordered but I mean it's free so can you really complain? I've ordered two or three times since and they all worked. It just seems the first batch (which by the way was when that was a new thing) had problems. They've since been ironed out in my experience.
who knows what version of linux works best for what situation.

Easy:

If you have experience with linux, all distros are pretty much the same.

If you have never used linux, then the best distro is the one you get preinstalled with your pc (or the one that would have come preinstalled if you had bought a new pc).

BTW, linux already made it to several desktops near me.

source and full article

I think that the first two points are slightly invalid. Look at Redhat and Novell. Too rather large players in the Linux world with commercially available and free products. They obviously have money backing. But it would seem accurate to say there is very little marketing involved. Anyone else have any ideas?

Further into the article, the author talks about the countless distros, WMs and everything else to choose from. I think we should start an ultimate newbie guide with info about the most common distros WMs, etc and provide tips to help users choose which is right for them. Then maybe part of the problem would disappear.

He also mentions vendors like IBM will soon follow Dell's footsteps in providing Linux on their machines and this just might also give a great boost in the market side of things.

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

and people using windows probably dont know what linux is for. did you not read what i said about gentoo/arch/debian????

i just dont understand why people bash things until they use it and give it a real chance, not a half assed "i put this cd in my drive and rebooted but its not what i expected" chance. if they did, maybe theyd see the point. if youve already done this, thats great, thanks for trying.

also, you probably use open source software and dont even realize it. the open source community doesnt only consist of people using an os that is 'never going to make it' as a desktop system so at least keep your comments more specific if you choose to continue bashing us.

You assume that everyone baggging linux has never used it, i use linux and i know what linux is for, i have tried a few different versions of linux and tried to work them out, but i can't be bothered spending hours on a forum just to find out how to install an application.

i think this is a typical linux user responce, you don't like us becasue you don't now anything, why don't you linux people listen to those of use that are telling you of the issues we expierienced and what made us avoid it, and maybe just maybe deal with it in the applications and OS's instead if just saying we are wrong. hell make it easy to insatll software and i will install linux

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

When you say "make software installation easy" I guess you actually mean "make software installation work as in Windows/OSX", yet I fail to see how installing stuff on those is any easier than in linux :huh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!