13 Reasons Why Linux Won't Make It To A Desktop Near You


Recommended Posts

When you say "make software installation easy" I guess you actually mean "make software installation work as in Windows/OSX", yet I fail to see how installing stuff on those is any easier than in linux :huh:

I think installing on Linux is actually easier. Here is a site that explains it: whylinuxisbetter.net

i really dont think linux will make it to a desktop market, mostly because there are 10 billion distros and trying to find the correct one. I always figured linux was more of a server os than anything. As thats what it has excelled at.

The only way it will happen is if some big company like pc world do it but TBH i really dont see them doing that as they would loose out on some money.

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

I download a .deb file, double click it, up pops a unified installer (like Installer.app on OS X), I click Install and it asks me for my admin password, and that's it.

I normally don't use that method though, Synaptic is easier, allows me to install multiple app's in one go, and has a huge repository of applications.

Of course, you have to realise no OS's are user friendly, and only after learning to use it does it become "user friendly", nobody was born being able to use Windows, everybody had to learn to.

Edit: every version of Linux I've ever used has come with OpenGL support :/ Are there versions out there without OpenGL, and do people seem to be using them?

mostly because there are 10 billion distros and trying to find the correct one. I always figured linux was more of a server os

Wouldn't you also have problems then to pick a distro for your server out of the 10 billion ("american" or "european" billion?) distros?

And what makes one distro more "correct" than the others?

14. Nothing that I want to use actually runs in Linux natively.

Same can be said for anything, Programs I use on OS X don't run under Windows, programs I use on Windows don't run on OS X, etc.

"Programs that aren't designed to work with it, don't work with it, so it's bad" is a lame reason.

Same can be said for anything, Programs I use on OS X don't run under Windows, programs I use on Windows don't run on OS X, etc.

"Programs that aren't designed to work with it, don't work with it, so it's bad" is a lame reason.

It's not about having the exact same applications on platform A and B, it's about finding applications that offer the same functionality. For example: I really need Adobe CS3 for college work, but there's simply nothing on Linux that comes close to the functionality of Adobe's Creative Suite. Running it inside an emulator of some kind is not an option. Same goes for Apple's iLife, I use that a great deal and again for me there's nothing on Linux that's able to fill it's place.

I think it's an extremely valid point when you're about to switch to another platform.

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

Not to sound like an advertiser but openSuSE 10.3 will have a system that is a step in this direction called 1-click install, which will enable the software providers to package the files needed (or rather the instructions where to fetch the files) in one single button on their web pages and automate the installation.?

It's still heavily developed and when 10.3 comes out, we'll see how it works in real life. It'll be a step in the "right" direction for new adopters.

That and Linux can't even recognize all my mouse buttons without me having to open a console and manually edit a config file. Welcome to 2 decades ago Linux.

XP doesn't do it out of the box either for that matter (MS Wireless Explorer v2 or Logitech MX700)

Now go away you clueless troll.

XP sure as hell does know I have a foward and back button on all the mice I've used. Linux doesn't.

Linux knew what my mouse brand was, and my keyboard (both Microsoft wireless) and automatically configured the mouse buttons and wheel. They work just like they did in XP. I never seen a forward and back button on a mouse though, good luck getting it installed. There are lots of forums out there where you can find help or ask questions, if no one can help you here. People are very helpful, like they are here in the Linux section and Windows section as well :D

They work just like they did in XP. I never seen a forward and back button on a mouse though, good luck getting it installed.

The two side buttons are pretty standard for most mice above 3 buttons.

There are lots of forums out there where you can find help or ask questions, if no one can help you here. People are very helpful, like they are here in the Linux section and Windows section as well :D

That's precisely my point. This is simple stuff that should work right out of the box. I've been able to get those buttons to work but it requires manually edit config files, something an average user shouldn't be doing, or shouldn't have to. Now getting all 13 or so buttons on the MX1000 to work is another task in itself.

for who? You want mom and dad to use one version and aunt emma to use another? why can't you just make 1 version that satisfies both people..at the same time.....?

*sigh* Here goes...

Making a unified distro because there are too many would mean making another distro, which actually makes the issue of "too many distros!!1" worse. And if you think a unified distro is so great, why did Microsoft make several different versions of Vista? Because they understand that people have different wants and needs with an OS.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one simple version, let users expand from there and be done with it?" Because people don't want to fuss around too much when they first install Linux, which is one of the complaints of Linux in the first place, so you'd be making that issue worse.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one all-in-one version and be done with it?" Bloat. Not everyone has a DVD drive, not everyone has the patience to sit through a torrent that may take days, not everyone has the HDD capacity, and most importantly, not everyone wants what's included. This is the fundamental advantage of distros: choice.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one version that has the right amount and let users add/remove?" Who's to say what people want? Who's to say how much is too much and how little is too little? I would recommend Ubuntu for this situation. Others would recommend SuSE. Not everyone wants the same thing...some might say "Ah, Ubuntu's great and all, but I like the layout of KDE"

I think I've made my point ;)

The two side buttons are pretty standard for most mice above 3 buttons.

That's precisely my point. This is simple stuff that should work right out of the box. I've been able to get those buttons to work but it requires manually edit config files, something an average user shouldn't be doing, or shouldn't have to. Now getting all 13 or so buttons on the MX1000 to work is another task in itself.

To be honest, I am new with Linux so share your fear of the CLI. I used to be good with Windows, doing odd things with batch files but that was about it. I will explore the CLI in Linux more once I get more comfortable with everything.

Every operating system has things it can't do out of the box. Just check out the help sections here for Windows and the many ones on Linux here and elsewhere. But these are also learning opportunities and chances to help others once you what you are doing :D

This is the fundamental advantage of distros: choice.

The average (mom and pop) user doesn't want choice, they want something that works. 3 different versions of Vista is confusing enough for some people, you want them to choose between 500 different distros of Linux? :blink:

The average computer user could care less what OS is on their system, most of them couldn't even tell you what OS means. They want:

  • Their computer to just "work"
  • It to be easy to use
  • It to run the software they want

3 things Linux fails to accomplish.

..."Ah, Ubuntu's great and all, but I like the layout of KDE"

I think I've made my point ;)

But PureLegend... There's always Kubutu :D

Back on track though, this is something you can never get right. I'd personally have too much choice, than too little choice - that way, at least I have the freedom to be able to choose.

This battle can never be won. People will moan if there's not enough choice, and people will moan if there's too much choice (i seem to remember loads of people saying that they wished there were more versions of XP to suit different backgrounds, and people then saying that there's too many versions of Vista)

To be honest, I am new with Linux so share your fear of the CLI.

Fear and desire are two different things. I can use the CLI, I just don't want to. Doing menial tasks like installing mouse drivers should be a double click operation, something Linux can't seem to grasp. It's getting better, but still a long way to go.

Yeah sure Windows doesn't do plenty of stuff out of the box, but 90% of the time that can be fixed by downloading one file and double clicking it. In Linux it usually requires downloading multiple packages, un tar them, compile them, install them, oh wait... you need qt4 v4.2.5 not qt4 v4.2.3?! I shouldn't be spending more time installing and configuring software than actually using it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!