13 Reasons Why Linux Won't Make It To A Desktop Near You


Recommended Posts

When you say "make software installation easy" I guess you actually mean "make software installation work as in Windows/OSX", yet I fail to see how installing stuff on those is any easier than in linux :huh:

I think installing on Linux is actually easier. Here is a site that explains it: whylinuxisbetter.net

i really dont think linux will make it to a desktop market, mostly because there are 10 billion distros and trying to find the correct one. I always figured linux was more of a server os than anything. As thats what it has excelled at.

The only way it will happen is if some big company like pc world do it but TBH i really dont see them doing that as they would loose out on some money.

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

I download a .deb file, double click it, up pops a unified installer (like Installer.app on OS X), I click Install and it asks me for my admin password, and that's it.

I normally don't use that method though, Synaptic is easier, allows me to install multiple app's in one go, and has a huge repository of applications.

Of course, you have to realise no OS's are user friendly, and only after learning to use it does it become "user friendly", nobody was born being able to use Windows, everybody had to learn to.

Edit: every version of Linux I've ever used has come with OpenGL support :/ Are there versions out there without OpenGL, and do people seem to be using them?

mostly because there are 10 billion distros and trying to find the correct one. I always figured linux was more of a server os

Wouldn't you also have problems then to pick a distro for your server out of the 10 billion ("american" or "european" billion?) distros?

And what makes one distro more "correct" than the others?

14. Nothing that I want to use actually runs in Linux natively.

Same can be said for anything, Programs I use on OS X don't run under Windows, programs I use on Windows don't run on OS X, etc.

"Programs that aren't designed to work with it, don't work with it, so it's bad" is a lame reason.

Same can be said for anything, Programs I use on OS X don't run under Windows, programs I use on Windows don't run on OS X, etc.

"Programs that aren't designed to work with it, don't work with it, so it's bad" is a lame reason.

It's not about having the exact same applications on platform A and B, it's about finding applications that offer the same functionality. For example: I really need Adobe CS3 for college work, but there's simply nothing on Linux that comes close to the functionality of Adobe's Creative Suite. Running it inside an emulator of some kind is not an option. Same goes for Apple's iLife, I use that a great deal and again for me there's nothing on Linux that's able to fill it's place.

I think it's an extremely valid point when you're about to switch to another platform.

personally i think the reason is it is too damn hard to do anythign if you are a NOOB. all i can say is make software installation easy, like have an installer, and people will come, make people compile up their own appiations so they can install it and they will get scared off. adn make it easy to use, as it stands ihave not seen a version of linux that is easy for a noob to use.

Not to sound like an advertiser but openSuSE 10.3 will have a system that is a step in this direction called 1-click install, which will enable the software providers to package the files needed (or rather the instructions where to fetch the files) in one single button on their web pages and automate the installation.?

It's still heavily developed and when 10.3 comes out, we'll see how it works in real life. It'll be a step in the "right" direction for new adopters.

That and Linux can't even recognize all my mouse buttons without me having to open a console and manually edit a config file. Welcome to 2 decades ago Linux.

XP doesn't do it out of the box either for that matter (MS Wireless Explorer v2 or Logitech MX700)

Now go away you clueless troll.

XP sure as hell does know I have a foward and back button on all the mice I've used. Linux doesn't.

Linux knew what my mouse brand was, and my keyboard (both Microsoft wireless) and automatically configured the mouse buttons and wheel. They work just like they did in XP. I never seen a forward and back button on a mouse though, good luck getting it installed. There are lots of forums out there where you can find help or ask questions, if no one can help you here. People are very helpful, like they are here in the Linux section and Windows section as well :D

They work just like they did in XP. I never seen a forward and back button on a mouse though, good luck getting it installed.

The two side buttons are pretty standard for most mice above 3 buttons.

There are lots of forums out there where you can find help or ask questions, if no one can help you here. People are very helpful, like they are here in the Linux section and Windows section as well :D

That's precisely my point. This is simple stuff that should work right out of the box. I've been able to get those buttons to work but it requires manually edit config files, something an average user shouldn't be doing, or shouldn't have to. Now getting all 13 or so buttons on the MX1000 to work is another task in itself.

for who? You want mom and dad to use one version and aunt emma to use another? why can't you just make 1 version that satisfies both people..at the same time.....?

*sigh* Here goes...

Making a unified distro because there are too many would mean making another distro, which actually makes the issue of "too many distros!!1" worse. And if you think a unified distro is so great, why did Microsoft make several different versions of Vista? Because they understand that people have different wants and needs with an OS.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one simple version, let users expand from there and be done with it?" Because people don't want to fuss around too much when they first install Linux, which is one of the complaints of Linux in the first place, so you'd be making that issue worse.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one all-in-one version and be done with it?" Bloat. Not everyone has a DVD drive, not everyone has the patience to sit through a torrent that may take days, not everyone has the HDD capacity, and most importantly, not everyone wants what's included. This is the fundamental advantage of distros: choice.

"But PureLegend, why not just make one version that has the right amount and let users add/remove?" Who's to say what people want? Who's to say how much is too much and how little is too little? I would recommend Ubuntu for this situation. Others would recommend SuSE. Not everyone wants the same thing...some might say "Ah, Ubuntu's great and all, but I like the layout of KDE"

I think I've made my point ;)

The two side buttons are pretty standard for most mice above 3 buttons.

That's precisely my point. This is simple stuff that should work right out of the box. I've been able to get those buttons to work but it requires manually edit config files, something an average user shouldn't be doing, or shouldn't have to. Now getting all 13 or so buttons on the MX1000 to work is another task in itself.

To be honest, I am new with Linux so share your fear of the CLI. I used to be good with Windows, doing odd things with batch files but that was about it. I will explore the CLI in Linux more once I get more comfortable with everything.

Every operating system has things it can't do out of the box. Just check out the help sections here for Windows and the many ones on Linux here and elsewhere. But these are also learning opportunities and chances to help others once you what you are doing :D

This is the fundamental advantage of distros: choice.

The average (mom and pop) user doesn't want choice, they want something that works. 3 different versions of Vista is confusing enough for some people, you want them to choose between 500 different distros of Linux? :blink:

The average computer user could care less what OS is on their system, most of them couldn't even tell you what OS means. They want:

  • Their computer to just "work"
  • It to be easy to use
  • It to run the software they want

3 things Linux fails to accomplish.

..."Ah, Ubuntu's great and all, but I like the layout of KDE"

I think I've made my point ;)

But PureLegend... There's always Kubutu :D

Back on track though, this is something you can never get right. I'd personally have too much choice, than too little choice - that way, at least I have the freedom to be able to choose.

This battle can never be won. People will moan if there's not enough choice, and people will moan if there's too much choice (i seem to remember loads of people saying that they wished there were more versions of XP to suit different backgrounds, and people then saying that there's too many versions of Vista)

To be honest, I am new with Linux so share your fear of the CLI.

Fear and desire are two different things. I can use the CLI, I just don't want to. Doing menial tasks like installing mouse drivers should be a double click operation, something Linux can't seem to grasp. It's getting better, but still a long way to go.

Yeah sure Windows doesn't do plenty of stuff out of the box, but 90% of the time that can be fixed by downloading one file and double clicking it. In Linux it usually requires downloading multiple packages, un tar them, compile them, install them, oh wait... you need qt4 v4.2.5 not qt4 v4.2.3?! I shouldn't be spending more time installing and configuring software than actually using it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!