13 Reasons Why Linux Won't Make It To A Desktop Near You


Recommended Posts

The average (mom and pop) user doesn't want choice, they want something that works. 3 different versions of Vista is confusing enough for some people, you want them to choose between 500 different distros of Linux? :blink:

The average computer user could care less what OS is on their system, most of them couldn't even tell you what OS means. They want:

  • Their computer to just "work"
  • It to be easy to use
  • It to run the software they want

3 things Linux fails to accomplish.

Didn't you just contradict yourself? They want something that works. They don't want to go through setting up their computer to be the way they want it to be, they want it to be that way from the word "Go". So they choose a distro that is suitable for their needs. And, let's be honest, how many distros are really targeted at first-time Linux users? Not many IMO. So there isn't that much choice :/

And where did this notion come from that Linux is hard to use? When my HDD died I actually went with Linux over Vista because I found Vista much harder to set up than Linux. It uses a similar window layout to Windows, too. The only thing that's hard about Linux is the slightly different layout.

As for installing programs, I think Synaptic Package Manager is actually much superior to the Windows way of going to the website :yes:

Yeah sure Windows doesn't do plenty of stuff out of the box, but 90% of the time that can be fixed by downloading one file and double clicking it. In Linux it usually requires downloading multiple packages, un tar them, compile them, install them, oh wait... you need qt4 v4.2.5 not qt4 v4.2.3?! I shouldn't be spending more time installing and configuring software than actually using it.

I never had to do this for any program and I have installed a lot on my Ubuntu laptop, though I know what you are talking about can be the case. Here is a link that explains the state of the art today with Linux as far as installing programs goes. Are you trying to frighten people who may be considering Linux? Are you using a ten year old version of Linux? No offence, I just can't tell where you get your information. ;-)

Also, you seem also to be blaming Linux for what is really the fault of a hardware company who hasn't supplied a driver. Luckily a great deal of hardware is supported by Linux anyway. Unluckily, your mouse was not.

And where did this notion come from that Linux is hard to use?

I think I've already established that with the entire mouse button debacle. ;)

Also, you seem also to be blaming Linux for what is really the fault of a hardware company who hasn't supplied a driver.

No, I'm blaming Linux for not supplying decent default drivers like Windows does.

For the record, I've been using Ubuntu 7.04 supposedly the most comprehensive and user friendly version of Linux, it falls far short. Half the time I'm guessing if what I'm installing or typing in Terminal will actually work and do what I want, this doesn't happen in Xp, Vista maybe a little. :p

Edited by Zoue

#14. You have to deal with the type of people that have posted in this thread.

Honestly not meaning to be insulting, but it's plainly obvious that most of the people posting here are just so completely far gone into their own little computing world that they have no idea what the mindset is of the typical Joe Schmoe computer user. Basically, you Linux guys are your own worst enemies.

No, I'm blaming Linux for not supplying decent default drivers like Windows does.

You know as well as anyone else that it is always hit and miss with these things. Example: Vista did not have a driver for my wifi. Linux did.

The world is full of such examples so as to make what you're claiming a bit misleading (FUD really). I'm starting to agree that you may be trolling here. :-(

#14. You have to deal with the type of people that have posted in this thread.

Honestly not meaning to be insulting, but it's plainly obvious that most of the people posting here are just so completely far gone into their own little computing world that they have no idea what the mindset is of the typical Joe Schmoe computer user. Basically, you Linux guys are your own worst enemies.

If the mindset of Joe Schmoe is as narrow as you make out it is, Macs would never sell ;)

I've installed linux on my laptop quite a few times, but no matter what distro I'm using, I can't get my wireless connection up and running. One day, hopefully, the whole linux community will be more organized and can get a product out that is easier to use than Windows. I'm sure that day isn't THAT far off. I would gladly become a full-time switcher if a Linux distro could fully satisfy all of my computing needs, with minimal work. I don't want to spend the first 5 hours of a new OS installation just trying to get the wireless connection up and running.

You know as well as anyone else that it is always hit and miss with these things. Example: Vista did not have a driver for my wifi. Linux did.

All I was originally saying is that I would expect an OS released in 2007 to have something as simple as support for more than 3 mice buttons out of the box. XP does, Vista does, somehow Linux doesn't. And if I want to add that support it shouldn't be a 30 minute process. If that makes me a troll then so be it.

I want to like Linux I really do, I want to be able to use free software and a free OS, I want to support Open source, but at the end of the day when I can't run the software I want (not entirely fault of Linux I'm aware), and when I'm practically tearing out my hair trying to get things to work right, I just can't. Linux still has a long way to go before it's even close to being usable for the average user.

All I was originally saying is that I would expect an OS released in 2007 to have something as simple as support for more than 3 mice buttons out of the box. XP does, Vista does, somehow Linux doesn't. And if I want to add that support it shouldn't be a 30 minute process. If that makes me a troll then so be it.

I want to like Linux I really do, I want to be able to use free software and a free OS, I want to support Open source, but at the end of the day when I can't run the software I want (not entirely fault of Linux I'm aware), and when I'm practically tearing out my hair trying to get things to work right, I just can't. Linux still has a long way to go before it's even close to being usable for the average user.

I feel EXACTLY the same way.

All I was originally saying is that I would expect an OS released in 2007 to have something as simple as support for more than 3 mice buttons out of the box. XP does, Vista does, somehow Linux doesn't. And if I want to add that support it shouldn't be a 30 minute process. If that makes me a troll then so be it.

I want to like Linux I really do, I want to be able to use free software and a free OS, I want to support Open source, but at the end of the day when I can't run the software I want (not entirely fault of Linux I'm aware), and when I'm practically tearing out my hair trying to get things to work right, I just can't. Linux still has a long way to go before it's even close to being usable for the average user.

As is often pointed out, normal everyday users of computers never actually install operating systems. They come installed already with all their drivers on purchased computers. Most normal people would be too terrified by the idea of installing an operating system. Any operating system that is already installed with all the right drivers onto a computer "just works", whether it is Windows, Mac or Linux.

If you want a painless way to move to Linux, why not buy a Dell Linux system next time you're in the market?

You'll see then that Linux properly installed with all the drivers, like you get when you'd buy such a system, is just as "ready for the desktop" as Windows or Mac. :D

Doing menial tasks like installing mouse drivers should be a double click operation
you know, if you use kde (possibly gnome too) you can get this exact behavior but in ONE click, not two. assuming of course at least one button on your mouse already works... :p.

on a serious note, may of the 'issues' that linux has are driven by lack of support by the hardware companies. windows can ship default drivers because companies will work with them. companies dont want to work with the linux community and that makes it damn near impossible to come up with drivers that will cover any hardware. this is the same problem with wireless. luckily broadcom has recently started supporting linux better than it has in the past so wireless issues are becoming less and less everyday.

as this will most likely be my last post on neowin, at least for a very long time, id like to end this on a simple note. if you are happy with your windows setup - stay with your windows set up. it will always be as good as it is right now so congratulations. on the other hand, if you are reading this thread and are the slightest bit curious about what else is out there, give linux a shot and make your own judgement - be it 'linux blows' or 'cool, i can do whatever i want, and it is free!'.

to all you linux heads, you can catch me in the arch forums or irc if you wanna chat.

You'll see then that Linux properly installed with all the drivers, like you get when you'd buy such a system, is just as "ready for the desktop" as Windows or Mac. :D

So what happens when the average user gets a new piece of hardware or software for thier new Linux OS that doesn't work? You expect them to go digging through the Terminal, searching forums for help, manually editing config files, downloading, compiling, and installing packages? On Windows it's simple, you download your drivers, you run the install .exe, it works.

I spent over 3 hours trying to install one piece of open source software on Ubunutu the other night, eventually I gave up. If I was on Windows I would have downloaded one .exe maybe a .zip and installed it. 5 minutes tops. Debian packages are catching on, but I still have run into issues with those as well.

Oh and don't even get me started on Gnome not remembering window size and placement. :p

Personally I wouldn't buy any hardware that didn't come with compatible drivers or that didn't just work (I would check the internet to see what others' experience have been). I have a digital camera and it just works on Linux when I plug it in. There is a wizard that pops up when I connect it, and then it asks me what I want to do, just like in Windows. It works on my scanner as well, no problem and no need to install any drivers (as I had to do with Windows).

I understand how frustrating it is not to have things work, but really no operating system gives you everything. I like Linux because it is so utterly cool, and maybe I did luck out not to have any drivers issues at all. :)

I spent over 3 hours trying to install one piece of open source software on Ubunutu the other night, eventually I gave up. If I was on Windows I would have downloaded one .exe maybe a .zip and installed it. 5 minutes tops. Debian packages are catching on, but I still have run into issues with those as well.

Were you compiling from source or something? Synaptic is very point-click-go.

Were you compiling from source or something? Synaptic is very point-click-go.

The program I was installing wasn't available through Synaptic and all the dependencies that it required had 10 or so different options (some of which were outdated) in Synaptic and I had no idea which ones did what. So yes, I was compiling, installing and altering my bash.bashrc through the terminal as that's what little help I could manage to scrounge up on the internet told me to do.

I understand how frustrating it is not to have things work, but really no operating system gives you everything.

And some give you a lot more than others. ;)

Edited by Zoue

Linux will hit desktops in a few years when the vast majority of people will incorporate computers as a familiar tool in their lives.

When 80% of people don't know what CTRL+C and CTRL+V mean (a fact I just now made up :)), you can't really explain the intricate concepts of a new operating system to them.

Linux will hit desktops in a few years when the vast majority of people will incorporate computers as a familiar tool in their lives.

When 80% of people don't know what CTRL+C and CTRL+V mean (a fact I just now made up :)), you can't really explain the intricate concepts of a new operating system to them.

did you know that 76% of all statistics are made up on the spot? :D

Wow I never expected some of the reactions that have been posted here.

Seriously. It's like nobody's ever heard of open source. Linux is not hard. It's different. I guess some people don't see that. I guess some other people don't see the fact that you can take a project and create your own to make it better or suit your needs, which is the point of multiple distros existing. Some bitch about the multitude yet they don't take into consideration that there are multiple versions of firefox, limewire, etc. An example would be that I hate ubuntu. I cannot stand it. So, I use debian. It suits my needs. The fact that there are multiple distributions is one of the reasons why Linux has succeeded in the way that it has.

Regarding the multiple distros, frankly I can't see what's so hard about going over to DistroWatch.com and choosing one of the top 5 from there and seeing what it's all about. That's the best thing for a newbie. They're top distros for a reason and usually it will relate to how well it works for newbies. But anyways..

Why the Linux Desktop Will Succeed Despite Itself

As I'm reading this article and he goes over the points of marketing I am profoundly confused. Linux companies expect to grow by word of mouth but the problem is, they're not out for global domination. For those who know their products, they just want to ensure a better user experience. If they expand to new users, great but I really doubt it's the main goal.

As I'm reading this article and he goes over the points of marketing I am profoundly confused. Linux companies expect to grow by word of mouth but the problem is, they're not out for global domination. For those who know their products, they just want to ensure a better user experience. If they expand to new users, great but I really doubt it's the main goal.

That depends on which Linux user you talk to. ;) I think his point in that article was not global domination, but mass maket acceptance. Linux is still very much a niche market, only known to the computer saavy. Heck even 10 years ago, you could have asked the average person what a Mac was and they probably couldn't tell you. That has certainly changed today, and he hit the nail on the head when he said people that want something different will be going to Mac not Linux. Without the marketing your average home PC user won't know what Linux is, let alone how it is different and what it's advantages are, and without that it will never break into the mass conscious.

That depends on which Linux user you talk to. ;) I think his point in that article was not global domination, but mass maket acceptance. Linux is still very much a niche market, only known to the computer saavy. Heck even 10 years ago, you could have asked the average person what a Mac was and they probably couldn't tell you. That has certainly changed today, and he hit the nail on the head when he said people that want something different will be going to Mac not Linux. Without the marketing your average home PC user won't know what Linux is, let alone how it is different and what it's advantages are, and without that it will never break into the mass conscious.

One of Linux's main advantages is being free. In order to begin advertising they may have to start charging for Linux, killing off one of it's key features. It's a lose-lose situation.

Some Linux companies do get some of it right. One of the reasons why Ubuntu is popular is that while Canonical, the company behind it, doesn't spend a lot of marketing money, they and founder Mark Shuttleworth, do spend some time marketing.

Ubuntu has a message, "Linux for People." That theme is highly visible Ubuntu's Web pages. Have a look. When you look at an official Ubuntu site, you immediately know this is not just another Linux site. The colors, the photograph of people from around the world -- it all adds up to Ubuntu having a distinct brand.

That right there shows that marketing doesn't neccesarily require a lot of money. You only to need to look at the huge popularity of Ubuntu to show that it pays off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!