[Pic] right brain vs left brain


Recommended Posts

Well I can control when she switches directions, how can that be a timer?

Illusion? I can stare at it, and not pay any attention I try not to focus and BOOM it suddenly changes. Try to stare at it, without devoting attention to anything. Stare at the leg and the way it swings, you'll see it glitch then swithces. Has nothing to do with our brain's.

Its on a relay, or a timer. It goes from clockwise to counter clockwise.

Hey, Manic.

Since you are so sure you are being tricked, go ahead and open up the .gif in GIMP (free software) or Photoshop or such if you have that. Confirm each frame for yourself, and see for yourself.

Amazing how people can be so stubbornly sure about something that just isn't true. It is playing the same images in the same sequence without reversing. You can play with timing and slow it down, too, if you want to try it at a slower speed.

Hey, Manic.

Since you are so sure you are being tricked, go ahead and open up the .gif in GIMP (free software) or Photoshop or such if you have that. Confirm each frame for yourself, and see for yourself.

Amazing how people can be so stubbornly sure about something that just isn't true. It is playing the same images in the same sequence without reversing. You can play with timing and slow it down, too, if you want to try it at a slower speed.

I'm at work at the moment I will have to try this later.

Can someone please try looking at her toe on the leg sticking out, and run your eyes up towards her mid section?? This makes it switch for me everytime I do it. I want to see if it does for everyone else

It didn't work for me, but then again the test seems to be entirely incorrect for me anyway.

Oh rly? Solid facts there Benplace, thanks for playin. KTHNXBAI! :rolleyes:
Illusion? I can stare at it, and not pay any attention I try not to focus and BOOM it suddenly changes. Try to stare at it, without devoting attention to anything. Stare at the leg and the way it swings, you'll see it glitch then swithces. Has nothing to do with our brain's.

You are wrong.

You jumped to a conclusion based on your blind faith in a deceived perception, knowing full well that this thread described it as an illusion in the first place. Perhaps you don't quite understand what an illusion is:

Illusion

il?lu?sion

?noun

1. something that deceives by producinfalse or misleading impression of reality.

2. the state or condition of being deceived; misapprehension.

3. an instancebeing deceived.

4. Psychology. a perception, as of visual stimuli (optical illusion), that represents what is perceived in a way different from the way it is in reality.

This is a silhouette of a spinning womA silhouette looks the same whether the object in questionx degrfromaway from the angle of incidence.

This means that when she is looking directly to the left and appearing to spin clockwise, it will look like she moves through 90 degrees to face away from the viewer, when in fact a viewer seeing her spin anticlockwise would instead say that she is factowards the viewer. Again, this is because the light blocked by the dancer is the same and symmetrical whether shex degrees from the angle of incidence in either direction.

We only assume this is not possible because we are preconditioned into thinking that everything we view has three dimensional depth. Please think and analyse the facts correctly next time before jumping to incorrect conclusions.

i've analysed this gif a lot because i saw it on another site first.

1. it is not a cheap trick (e.g. the gif switching randomly)

2. it works because it's a silhouette - you can't tell if certain parts are behind or in front. all there really is is 2D movement and your brain is making it 3D and giving it a rotation. let's focus on one area so i can explain better...

if you're picturing her going clockwise, when you see her out-stuck leg go from the left to the right, you're imagining it going behind her other leg. however, the exact same 2D motion of her leg going from left to right can also be interpreted as it rotating in front of her leg.

3. if it wasn't for the shadow i would say this gif has no ultimate direction, i.e. it is down to your brain's preference. i've studied the shadow long and hard and i believe it shows that ultimately, it is rotating anti-clockwise. this isn't really the point though. let's look at one without a shadow.

0569317100xs7.gif

same effect, and now we definitely know there is no ultimate direction.

4. to help some people understand, i took a single frame and drew in features. it shows how the same silhouette can be interpreted in two ways.

countervb0.jpg

clockwisekk5.jpg

try opening these up in two tabs and flicking between them.

5. this is just a more sophisticated version of a necker cube

necker.gif

is it facing down and left, or is it facing up and right? with this one it's a lot easier to flip between both. again, ultimately, it's just a bunch of 2D lines. our brain does the rest.

here's a rotating necker cube. it can be perceived as either rotating clockwise or anti-clockwise.

6. i'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with left/right brain theories.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!