Vista "Out of Memory" Error When Copying Files Hotfix


Recommended Posts

Those who run Windows Vista might suddenly run on a "Out of Memory" error while copying large batch of files. Adrian Kingsley-Hughes of ZDNet has a nice article explaining how it occurs.

The “Out of Memory” error (which is affectionately known at the PC Doc HQ as the “Out of Cheese” error … don’t ask why …) is one of the biggest and most baffling of Vista’s file handling problems has been occurs when a Vista user (running Kaspersky Anti Virus 6 or 7) tries to copy a large number of files (~16,400). I know, copying that many files is crazy and not something that people do every day, I’d expect a modern OS to be able to cope with this (am I asking too much???).

According to the hotfix link, the problem relies in "a memory leak in the Windows OLE component. This memory leak is triggered by the way that Windows Explorer deals with the extended attributes of the files." It's nice that Microsoft has released a hotfix for this problem, however, according to the article, SP1 doesn't have such hotfix.

Source: ZDNet Blogs

Link to the hotfix: Microsoft

however, according to the article, SP1 doesn't have such hotfix.

Um, why would it? SP1 is still in beta with new builds coming weekly. So any NEW hotfixes might not have be integrated YET. I think we should all assume this will be added to a future SP1 build.

Um, why would it? SP1 is still in beta with new builds coming weekly. So any NEW hotfixes might not have be integrated YET. I think we should all assume this will be added to a future SP1 build.

And if there are other tests going on related to this particular bug, including regression testing, for example. Usually, when a hotfix goes "public" (in other words, anyone can download it, and not only through the "request from microsoft" sillyness) then you'll see it rolled into an SP internal beta. Right now, this one is apparently something they are still holding onto.

Does this only cover the kaspersky issue ?

It's not an issue with Kapersky, the author might sound misleading by saying he was using it while doing the file transfer. The problem relies in a Windows OLE component memory leak, that triggers when doing file transfers. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!