Everyone's Switching to Mac's


Recommended Posts

Although I'm definitely a windows user, and if MS puts as much effort into their future OSs as they did Vista.... from the reset period to release.... then I'll never consider switching. However, I definitely think it's great that Apple is becoming more popular.... now Windows can finally start to have real competition in the consumer OS market.

I've been a professional in the IT business for a little more then a decade now. Back then Macs were these dull boxes with an OS that reminded me of the old atari days (i did miss a buzzing bee if i clicked on something though) but still it had a small bunch of people stating it was the best thing since man invented warm water.

In the beginning of those years the Mac started to stumble and almost fell until Stevie came along and started to tickle everybodies "i-want-gadget-button" with strong marketing campaigns. The Mac became stylish, trying to sell on looks. It performed pretty slow although ads proved otherwise. Then they secretly used the RDF they created to switch to a linux-kind of environment... placed a nice shell on that, pushed big dollars in marketing campaigns stating they reinvented the warm water.

A little later they take standard PC hardware, stuff it in a brushed aluminum, or shiny white plastic cover, put out all the bells and wistles that they again reinvented a new version of warm water.

After all these years the only things i've seen them do is create a user shell, some simple apps (easy to use ofcourse) you can find on snapfiles, and a nice box to hold standard PC hardware made by poor chinese children.

Although, i still think a Macbook is a nice top quality laptop for the price and it gives you a chance to run Windows, but without leeching on anothers back a Mac never became anything better than a workstation for a home environment, or maybe a standalone workstation in a shop that has to be simple and looks sleek.

In my job i need something i can roll out in companies with more then a few people, and that certainly is not Mac. I might get one for my girlfriend to have a stylish place in the livingroom some day though.

Just trying to break the RDF with my 2 nafls/cents.

I can see where the appeal lies but personally i'm a Windows guy myself. My mum has an MBP and I do use it occassionally but I find it so much easier to use XP. It's probably down to the fact i've been on XP forever whereas OS X much less, however I think BG is much nicer than SJ :rofl:

I use both. In fact I have 2 Macs, 4 PCs, and 1 Windows 2003 box.

It's just a pain getting used to keyboard shortcuts on the Mac and figuring out all the tweaks and stuff. There is also the lovely DS_Store files that the Macs leave on Windows boxes when you browse them :p I actually prefer to use my PC for image editting and the Mac for doing email, wireless sniffing, and other security related items. I really use them both equally though.

At the end of the day they are just operating systems. You pick one you like and you stick with it. You gotta learn both and I've found OSX no easier to learn than Windows was at first.

I've been a professional in the IT business for a little more then a decade now. Back then Macs were these dull boxes with an OS that reminded me of the old atari days (i did miss a buzzing bee if i clicked on something though) but still it had a small bunch of people stating it was the best thing since man invented warm water.

In the beginning of those years the Mac started to stumble and almost fell until Stevie came along and started to tickle everybodies "i-want-gadget-button" with strong marketing campaigns. The Mac became stylish, trying to sell on looks. It performed pretty slow although ads proved otherwise. Then they secretly used the RDF they created to switch to a linux-kind of environment... placed a nice shell on that, pushed big dollars in marketing campaigns stating they reinvented the warm water.

A little later they take standard PC hardware, stuff it in a brushed aluminum, or shiny white plastic cover, put out all the bells and wistles that they again reinvented a new version of warm water.

After all these years the only things i've seen them do is create a user shell, some simple apps (easy to use ofcourse) you can find on snapfiles, and a nice box to hold standard PC hardware made by poor chinese children.

Although, i still think a Macbook is a nice top quality laptop for the price and it gives you a chance to run Windows, but without leeching on anothers back a Mac never became anything better than a workstation for a home environment, or maybe a standalone workstation in a shop that has to be simple and looks sleek.

In my job i need something i can roll out in companies with more then a few people, and that certainly is not Mac. I might get one for my girlfriend to have a stylish place in the livingroom some day though.

Just trying to break the RDF with my 2 nafls/cents.

interesting point youre making.

unfortunately you dont seem to be that informed, although you worked in the it business as a professional for more than a decade now.

its not about the looks alone.

its about the, in the eyes of many people, also professionals, best OS out there plus the perfect interaction of fitting hardware in a very good designed case, while the last point is a matter of taste of course.

did you ever really try out mac os, while i must say mac osx, mac os9 cant be compared really? i guess you did.

what did you experience? a slowish, bloated, uneconomic operating system?

i would like to know which version you tried.

or you didnt try any. if thats the case you should stay out of this topic.

but then again that was just your 2 cents and thats of course absolutely okay and i appreciate that. =)

I use both. In fact I have 2 Macs, 4 PCs, and 1 Windows 2003 box.

It's just a pain getting used to keyboard shortcuts on the Mac and figuring out all the tweaks and stuff. There is also the lovely DS_Store files that the Macs leave on Windows boxes when you browse them :p I actually prefer to use my PC for image editting and the Mac for doing email, wireless sniffing, and other security related items. I really use them both equally though.

At the end of the day they are just operating systems. You pick one you like and you stick with it. You gotta learn both and I've found OSX no easier to learn than Windows was at first.

thumbs.db isn't friendly either on Windows, right?

But why so many computers? :s

There's definitely more Macs around. A year and a half ago, when I bought a Mac, I had only played with them in stores and read about them, and I loved the reviews, so I ordered a Mac Mini. Now, my brother has a macbook, 2 of my friends have macbooks, and I have a macbook pro. I've also noticed them a lot around town, compared to what it was like before.

To those of you who consider people who use Macs and talk about them here members of a cult, or fanboys, all of the Windows people seem to spend all of their time flaming Apple and talking about Windows in their own forums. We stay out of Windows forums if we don't have anything nice to say, wanna do us the same favor please? (Linux users are generally nicer towards Mac users, in my experience).

thumbs.db isn't friendly either on Windows, right?

But why so many computers? :s

thumbs.db sucks too, but at least Windows has a thumbnail preview mode :)

PCs:

Work Supplied Dell Laptop (main clean machine for working remote and stuff)

Work Supplied Dell Desktop (dev box that handles version control, software testing, VMWare, etc)

Personal Gaming Machine

Personal IBM Laptop used for tuning Subarus and datalogging, previously used for school work

Macs:

Personal Macbook for school (replaced the IBM laptop as my main laptop due to awesome battery life)

Work Supplied G4 Tower (for more testing AdmitMac, Lotus Notes, McAfee stuff, and development with XCode)

Server:

Personal Server that runs IIS for demoing websites, server side scripts, and other items for clients and doing testing and development of my own personal stuff.

Basically - I have a normal 9-5 job and I do outside web and application development. I also go to grad school and log Subaru WRXs and STis (or flash the ECU) for myself and my local people when I'm not working on stuff. You'd think I was wealthy or something after all of that and at the end of the day, I'm just not paid enough for my time haha. My point is that both operating systems have their purposes and at the end of the day you gotta use what is comfortable and what lets you get the job done quickly. When you're under the gun you better be using something you know how to use and can also get the job done. This day in age, having a Windows box and a Mac is normal in my book.

I'm still waiting for someone to convince me, or any of the family/friends I support, to buy a Mac.

Name just one major capability OS X has over Windows. Ease of use and asthetics don't count because they are nebulous - what could be easy to use to one person could be a major pain to another. I'm talking about a capability, built into the OS, that Windows doesn't have.

Rebutting a few of the petty arguments I have heard OS X users bring up again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again (ad nauseum):

Security: I am a user that uses protected mode in IE7 (a reduced permissions mode OS X doesn't have, BTW), doesn't click pop-up ads, and uses an extremely light and invisible security suite (OneCare - I know it isn't the best, but I want ease of use and a light footprint, as well as cheap). I have my mom and other inexperienced computer users on a standard account, with me being the sole person who knows the admin (or "root") password. I have never encountered a virus, and neither have they. Period. In fact, their computers are just as secure, if not more, than OS X. UAC isn't annoying, because I actually run programs that respect UAC and don't pop up unnecessary prompts - in fact, I haven't encountered a UAC prompt for days. UAC doesn't annoy me in the slightest. Question to OS X users: Can someone programmatically gain control of the keyboard and mouse, programmatically click on the unlock icon, and enter the password via simulated keystrokes? If so, then UAC has a security benefit over Apple's implementation, even though it is slightly more intrusive.

Stability: I use good quality components in the computers I build, as well as make sure the hardware vendors support Vista. Other than Creative (and nVidia to some extent), drivers have been a literal non-issue. Once I set up the computer, the users I support never have to deal with driver issues, and they have never encountered a driver BSOD issue. In fact, with the vast majority of computers that use integrated sound, everything works out of the box without having to install any drivers at all. As far as crashing goes, I would say that OS X crashes more than Vista - when I do presentations/teaching a computer class, I would much rather rely on Vista than OS X. I have heard too many reports where OS X freezes in the middle of a presentation - something that has never happened to me when I run Windows.

Speed: I have no idea what everyone is complaining about the speed issue with Vista. Maybe because I read the requirements for Vista and build computers accordingly, but the computers I have tested run much faster with Vista installed than XP - so much, in fact, that my mom, who doesn't know a whole lot about computers, noticed the speed increase (this was on the same computer I installed XP on a couple months before). The defragger is excellent, runs in the background, and rivals commercial defraggers like Diskeeper. I have never encountered the file transfer issue, but those with this issue will go away with the service pack coming out this next spring.

Applications: I would like a computer that can do anything - from reading email, to surfing, to playing games, to recording TV, without involving multiple OSs. There is only one OS to date, that can do that. Period. End of story. I can work in Photoshop (yes it load faster in Vista than it does in OS X - superfetch ftw!), record a TV show and play HL2 at the same time, minimize HL2, do some websurfing, check email, IM a few friends, and hop back into HL2, something that is utterly impossible to do on OS X.

Ease of use: Vista beats OS X, IMO by a large margin, simply because the vast majority of users use Windows at businesses (which will not change any time soon), and are already familiar with the user interface. With logging in users as a "Standard" user, I fail to see how OS X provides any benefit here. Explorer beats Finder, even with Leopard. In the new Finder, can you filter files(for example, say you have a download folder with a thousand items, and you want to find a zip file that was created a year ago. You can filter out the file types so only zip files show, and then filter the date to a range of dates or a single date)? Create "stacks" of files with similar properties, using the Finder, and save them as "saved searches"? Use instant search in the standard Open/save dialogs? Provide access to programs, settings, web browsing, run terminal commands, etc. all from one central location (the Start Menu)? Be able to view all open programs clearly and easily, with text showing the program and/or file name (I dare you to create 50 empty Word documents on OS X, label them differently, open them all at once, and quickly and easily be able to navigate to a specifically named document)? Access your photos that are in iPhoto 08 in the Finder without having to decompress a zipped file, export them, or "hack" it in any way? Keep your own folder structure and have iTunes respect it? This is not counting all the other annoyances like being able to control what your laptop does when you shut the lid, not being able to maximize a window (I am a task-oriented person - I want to view only one thing at a time and fill up the screen so I won't be distracted by other windows below it), not being able to adjust the height/width of a window from any corner or side I wish.

Computer options: I like configuring my computer the way I want. Dell will let me do that. I can build a computer exactly the way I want. If I want a computer that will let me play Crysis, I can do that fairly cheaply. However, I cannot configure a computer in the Apple store that will give me the specs I want, and even if it did, the price would be insane. Yes, certain configurations of Apple products match the competition, but if you vary, like add 2 Gb more memory, Macs quickly become more expensive than their PC counterparts. I cannot legally install OS X on a computer I build, using specs I want.

Memory management: Superfetch is an absolutely amazing memory management technology. My mom uses Outlook, Word, and Excel, and all are cached. Loading any of the applications are nearly instantaneous, even from the first time after booting. I use Photoshop, Premiere, and After Effect a lot, and they load amazingly quickly. OS X contains no such feature.

Built-in Apps: Vista's CD/DVD burner works great, you can select pictures in Photo Gallery and click "Burn to DVD", and transitions, timing, and picture length is automatically calculated. It is amazingly simple and easy to use. Plus, Photo Gallery doesn't compress your images into a file, but saves changes you make using the shadow copy feature. You can, believe it or not, access the photos directly in Explorer. Windows Media Center is lightyears above Front Row - I am constantly impressed with the capabilities of the program, from burning DVDs and CDs using only your remote, to accessing online content, with the TV guide for over-the-air broadcasts, to creating your own app that ties in to Media Center. The rest of the apps in OS X, like the capability to burn iso images and iChat, are "meh" at best. Microsoft would get sued if they included WLM in Vista, and hardly anyone other than power users know what an "iso" image is, let alone how to use it.

---------------------------------------

I don't want to "get used" to anything that makes my life more convoluted and complicated. I want the computer to work the way I want. If I don't want my music stored the way Steve Jobs thinks I should, there should be a way for me to store the music the way I want. Period. End of story. Same goes for maximizing windows, and practically anything Steve Jobs has influenced in OS X. I want options. I don't want to do it only one way. Yes, OS X works great if you like doing things the way Steve wants you to do them, but just try to do something outside of his vision for OS X, and you will encounter obstacle after obstacle (wonder why the Microsoft Office team couldn't duplicate Office 2007 for Macs? The HIG provides radical UI innovation opportunities, all for the sake of "consistency". Yes, consistency is important to some extent, but it also stifles creativity and innovation).

Have I missed anything?

I do see a few uses for OS X, however:

1. Users who have not ever used a computer before and do not know any knowledgeable Windows expert and/or know a OS X expert

2. Specialized settings (like printing) where Postscript is king - although this is not as important as it used to be

3. Users who constantly like changing OSs and want to explore every option available, simply because they like trying something "new"

4. Users who come from a Unix background and like the unix/BSD core of OS X

Oh, and by the way, exactly zero of the family/friends I support have moved to OS X, and I have not put any obstacles in their way (i.e. threaten lack of support, etc.) to switch to OS X. As long as the OS works and does what they want, with no spyware and virus problems, why should they move?

Edited by NateB1

NateB1 if someone convinced you then you'd be on a Mac. If not then it's obvious why you're still on Windows. The problem is the effort or knowledge you need to have Windows running at an efficient and secure way. Of course you'd think its simple because you're aware of the stuff out there and the methods to work with a Windows machine without the hiccups. But the fact is there is a lot of people who don't, and what they have heard on the streets is how Macs is able to alleviate their problems. If the solution is there, then why not take it?

The choice is given to the consumers. If they select Macs, then your arguments will do nothing to convince them to go through the miseries they had with a Windows machine, not even on Vista.

WHO CARES ABOUT SWITCHERS! In my opinion use what you like Apple will never be as strong as MS for only one reason HARDWARE, not really any options out there for upgrades ect..

Bold claim. What happens if Apple chooses to release a hardware flexible product? Mac Pro is a good start, though it might be expensive, Apple could choose to release a more economic machine in hte future. Then what if Apple releases OSX as a standalone universal OS? It is not a definite impossibility.

I'm still waiting for someone to convince me, or any of the family/friends I support, to buy a Mac.

Name just one major capability OS X has over Windows..................

^^ Since you did take time to write such a lengthy response I'll point out a major flaw in your reasoning.

You are basing your conclusions without having a balanced background. You only use a Windows based PC and not a Mac with OS X. All you did is make assumptions...I'd like to think no one can say which is better, but I do know one thing; I use both.

NateB1 if someone convinced you then you'd be on a Mac. If not then it's obvious why you're still on Windows. The problem is the effort or knowledge you need to have Windows running at an efficient and secure way. Of course you'd think its simple because you're aware of the stuff out there and the methods to work with a Windows machine without the hiccups. But the fact is there is a lot of people who don't, and what they have heard on the streets is how Macs is able to alleviate their problems. If the solution is there, then why not take it?

The choice is given to the consumers. If they select Macs, then your arguments will do nothing to convince them to go through the miseries they had with a Windows machine, not even on Vista.

Note my exception list. I realize there are those people who are fine with running OS X. I personally don't see any reason to switch, but I can see someone switching if they had a bad experience with Windows. If my post came out somewhat strong, that is because I am absolutely fed up with posts here and elsewhere bashing/flaming Microsoft products and especially Windows, simply because of past difficulties they have had with the platform, or because of the "intense competitive spirit" (I call it the Apple virus) that infests what seems like a majority of Apple users. Also note that I don't go into Apple forums and bash OS X, simply because it is OS X(For example, if someone's having issues with their Mac, I don't post annoying "Get a PC" posts). If I do post on an Apple topic, I back up my post with evidence and my reasons for not using it.

I'm still waiting for someone to convince me, or any of the family/friends I support, to buy a Mac.

<snip>

Nice (and very lengthy, I might add) speech on why you don't like Macs. However, this isn't a "let's convince NateB1 to buy a Mac" thread. In fact, it isn't a "convince anyone to buy a Mac" thread.

It is an observation that in the thread starter's small sampling of friends/relatives buying Apples. And this isn't even likely a complete "switching" as many of them probably own a Windows PC, as well. It is an increase of people diversifying their computing platforms. The increase of sales of Apple PCs is factual. It is happening. And I am pretty sure people here on Neowin don't care if NateB1 uses one (you obviously don't). Or if I do (I don't either).

Back on-topic: Yeah, I notice a lot more people with MacBooks out than I have ever noticed in the past.

You need to read this.

And please, everyone you know is not everyone, since you, and everyone else, can only accurately conceptualize about 150 people. I personally don't know a single person that owns an Apple, other than the handful of lemmings that have an iPod sitting around somewhere.

Nice (and very lengthy, I might add) speech on why you don't like Macs. However, this isn't a "let's convince NateB1 to buy a Mac" thread. In fact, it isn't a "convince anyone to buy a Mac" thread.

It is an observation that in the thread starter's small sampling of friends/relatives buying Apples. And this isn't even likely a complete "switching" as many of them probably own a Windows PC, as well. It is an increase of people diversifying their computing platforms. The increase of sales of Apple PCs is factual. It is happening. And I am pretty sure people here on Neowin don't care if NateB1 uses one (you obviously don't). Or if I do (I don't either).

Back on-topic: Yeah, I notice a lot more people with MacBooks out than I have ever noticed in the past.

I was simply providing a counterpoint to the original post. None of the family/friends I support are getting Macs, as opposed to the OP's family and friends who are purchasing Macs. I probably went a bit too long, but I simply fail to grasp why getting a Mac is (1) special, and (2) advantageous over Windows. I'm also responding to posters in previous posts who were advocating OS X over Windows for various reasons.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!