Everyone's Switching to Mac's


Recommended Posts

...

I personally don't know a single person that owns an Apple, other than the handful of lemmings that have an iPod sitting around somewhere.

And how is it that you have knowledge to share with us on how people choose an Apple because they are thoughtless lemmings, rather than perhaps required or desirable for their line of work, or they just want relatively worry web browsing and email.

And you decide to stereotype them with negative imagery. Good job. A new low point to this thread.

This thread sure took the crapper--it's not like Ker was trying to convert you guys to Mac or anything, sheesh.

By the way, I agree with the OP. At least 30% of my campus must use macs looking at all the apples I see on the back of laptops. They haven't saturated the market but they sure as hell put a dent in it looking at their sales figures.

Two research firms that track the computer market said last week that Apple would move into third place in the U.S. behind Hewlett-Packard Co. on Monday, when it reports product shipments in the fiscal fourth-quarter as part of its earnings announcement, the Times reported.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/appl...07AA02359421%7D

A year or so I was the only one with a Mac. With my brother getting one today, and most of my friends having purchased one recently most everyone I know has an Apple Computer now. Its funny how quickly things have changed, and I love the fact that I don't have to remove spy-ware on a monthly basis from peoples PC any-longer.

And yet I can only name one person that has one in my area... I've noticed that a lot of people online that buy them buy them for the looks and use bootcamp for windows... just my impression

And how is it that you have knowledge to share with us on how people choose an Apple because they are thoughtless lemmings, rather than perhaps required or desirable for their line of work, or they just want relatively worry web browsing and email.

And you decide to stereotype them with negative imagery. Good job. A new low point to this thread.

I have nothing against Apple computers, or even the people that own them. I have a problem with people that buy an iPod simply because it's an iPod, then leave it sitting in a drawer somewhere because they actually have no use for it. Hence the iPod-lemming statement I made, unless in your strange world an iPod is required for employment. And even that, isn't really much of a "problem" I have, in as that I've never had longer than a 10 second conversation about a media player. Way to seriously miss the point and go on another of your pointless tirades.

You need to read this.

And please, everyone you know is not everyone, since you, and everyone else, can only accurately conceptualize about 150 people. I personally don't know a single person that owns an Apple, other than the handful of lemmings that have an iPod sitting around somewhere.

Maybe I'm unique, but I think I can accurately conceptualize over 150 people. I fully "conceptualize" the bus drivers and other various people I see (like mailmen, construction workers, etc.) as human, with feelings and a family. I don't think of anyone, including the posters here, as drops in a sea of people.

Consequently, I view the posters here as real human beings, including Mac users. I'm sure the OP knows everyone is not switching, I think he was just commenting on people he knows.

Outside of the family/friends I support, none of which have switched, I do know of some who had a bad experience with Windows and have switched. And yes, sadly, I see a growing number of Macs popping up (I live near Portland, OR, in which there is a major Mac userbase).

In fact, I could play devil's advocate and turn your statement around: just because you don't see anyone switch does not mean no one is switching.

Maybe I'm unique, but I think I can accurately conceptualize over 150 people. I fully "conceptualize" the bus drivers and other various people I see (like mailmen, construction workers, etc.) as human, with feelings and a family. I don't think of anyone, including the posters here, as drops in a sea of people.

Consequently, I view the posters here as real human beings, including Mac users. I'm sure the OP knows everyone is not switching, I think he was just commenting on people he knows.

Outside of the family/friends I support, none of which have switched, I do know of some who had a bad experience with Windows and have switched. And yes, sadly, I see a growing number of Macs popping up (I live near Portland, OR, in which there is a major Mac userbase).

In fact, I could play devil's advocate and turn your statement around: just because you don't see anyone switch does not mean no one is switching.

Never said they were or weren't. Merely said no one that I know has switched. Do I see people in airports or out-and-about with an Apple product? Yep. Do I know them? Nope.

why are mac fanpeople so proud that they got people converted? Its so hypocritical... they argue how anyone that is pro-Microsoft is like a corporate zombie but isnt that the same thing if u were pro-apple?

Im sorry but im gonna have to equate mac fanpeople to Jehova's Witnesses.

(p.s. If you are a Jehova's Witness, im sorry if I offended you, its just that there are these two guys that keep coming to the house once every week and try to tell their "story", its quite annoying)

Pft... Ignored.

Have you ever used a Mac.... No? Didn't think so. If you've ever used one, you'd understand.

This thread sure took the crapper--it's not like Ker was trying to convert you guys to Mac or anything, sheesh.

By the way, I agree with the OP. At least 30% of my campus must use macs looking at all the apples I see on the back of laptops. They haven't saturated the market but they sure as hell put a dent in it looking at their sales figures.

Two research firms that track the computer market said last week that Apple would move into third place in the U.S. behind Hewlett-Packard Co. on Monday, when it reports product shipments in the fiscal fourth-quarter as part of its earnings announcement, the Times reported.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/appl...07AA02359421%7D

Seems to be the opposite here... 15,000 students on campus and I think our last stat for the university (the poll every so often for types of systems used) and only 1% is Mac... duno if it will change but seems to still be mainly the art department that has them

Yeah I'm in Arts and 80% of the computers that I see the department use and students bring to lectures are Macs. Otherwise in my other Geography and Philosophy courses the percentage is much lower.

However the Mac Q4 earnings is going to be annouced in 10 minutes and hopefully we can see some statistics there.

Apple shipped 2,164,000 Macintosh? computers, representing 34 percent growth over the year-ago quarter and exceeding the previous quarterly record for Mac? shipments by 400,000. The Company sold 10,200,000 iPods during the quarter, representing 17 percent growth over the year-ago quarter. Quarterly iPhone™ sales were 1,119,000, bringing cumulative fiscal 2007 sales to 1,389,000.

“We are very pleased to have generated over $24 billion in revenue and $3.5 billion in net income in fiscal 2007,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO. “We’re looking forward to a strong December quarter as we enter the holiday season with Apple’s best products ever.” i>

Very nice. It's Apple first 2M+ in a quarter ever.

I won't be switching any time soon, but I see why they're popular. They are pretty, sleek... I respect Apple for how well they did/are doing with iPods :) good stuff

I wonder if they didnt have the ipod would their pc sales be as good?

mac sales account for 62% of total revenue, Music sales account for 36%, research shows 95% iPhone owners would recommend device to others.

387,000 members in one-to-one and pro care...approx 40 stores to open in the coming year in the U.S. and internationally. First store in China to open in Bejing this summer.

I got a Mac recently and I adore it frankly.

For me it brings together the functionality of Windows (support for digital cameras, good usable apps, etc) and the 'difference' of Linux as well as a lot of the tools i'm familiar with on Linux. It really is the perfect OS for me and its just a nice bonus that the Mac Mini is so inconspicuous and virtually silent in my room. I'm a light sleeper and its the first machine i've ever been able to leave running / doing stuff without it keeping me awake.

But hey.. everyone is different and I respect that. It works great for me though. Once Leopard hits i'll bootcamp the mac with Windows XP as I still need to go back for some things.. and then try and ween myself off my PC and specifically video games as they're all that are holding me back from being a proper switcher.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!