Recommended Posts

I've considered it but always opted for PerfectDisk because it work and because Diskeeper has a much steeper price point.

as can be seen in the Comparrison Chart, to get access to all the features you need the top tier version. Maybe you don't need I-Faast but considering Raxco gives you everything for the one price I don't like the idea of paying more. Even more disconcerning is they havent upgraded the maximum volume for the lower priced releases from what I can see. 768GB is not alot to have nowdays and I'm quite sure my next PC will be in the region of 1GB to 1.5GB for a single data volume. In 12 months I would say 2TB could be pushing it for many users. Simply put, the space restriction would force me to buy the top tier product.

Ahh and cos by Dec I'll have 3 pc's, I have 2 now, I'd need a 3 user license. For Diskeeper thats a smooth $249 for the premier. Thats in comparrison to Perfect Disk which sells it's three user license for $69.95 and I find 10 - 20% vouchers off all over the web and even on their website every other month. Simply put, this programs overpriced I think and the drive limitations is too limited in a day where 1TB drives are on the market.

I think defrag is so over-rated. All that (scan times, MONEY, etc) just to save a few seconds of load time on a program? I guess I could understand if you beta test, and you uninstall/install A LOT. But for the below-average and average user?

Use AusLogics Disk Defrager for christ sake or even the Vista one. Don't pay for something that's not needed.

PerfectDisk, Diskeeper among others, put things in your startup and has to many processes running; hell that's enough to slow some people down.

PerfectDisk, Diskeeper among others, put things in your startup and has to many processes running; hell that's enough to slow some people down.

Not too many :) but only one service that set there doing nothing if you didn't enable automatic defragmentation and can be safely disabled or set to manual. But I agree, no need for external defrag program if it wasn't for Vista very poor default one, unlike XP's which was sufficient.

I have installed yesterday PerfectDisk, after 5 minutes uninstalled it, why? cause it is S.L.O.W. (is anyone there?)

i'm using Windows Vista, and it tooks 4 minutes to analyse only one of my drives (the fastest), while Diskeeper only takes 14 seconds, wtf? (i can't even imagine how much time PD use for defrag.... v.v' )

Anyway, when the Diskeeper trial expires I will install Auslogics Disk Defrag, at least it's free and the best i know in the Freeware area'.

BCool

Err ... wrong topic:laugh:h:

@ Spyder - Yes, it has activation.

Radish?

It has activation?! Whe:/? :/ I got my download with a file that I think must be the key. Downloaded / installed didn't get asked to activa:$036;

I have installed yesterday PerfectDisk, after 5 minutes uninstalled it, why? cause it is S.L.O.W. (is anyone there?)

i'm using Windows Vista, and it tooks 4 minutes to analyse only one of my drives (the fastest), while Diskeeper only takes 14 seconds, wtf? (i can't even imagine how much time PD use for defrag.... v.v' )

Anyway, when the Diskeeper trial expires I will install Auslogics Disk Defrag, at least it's free and the best i know in the Freeware area'.

BCool

I tried Perfectdisk and had the same experien:/. :/ Plus, well, I don't know but Perfectdisk just doesn't look very professional - maybe that's just me. Anyway, I have always trusted Diskeeper to keep my FS organised and it's never failed me.

There is the Great Defrag Shootout but I dont know if its what you consider proper.

That blog right there is a prime example of someone, anyone on the internet can post anything and without backup of proof spout off and others blindly accept that for the truth and nothing but the truth. In reality, it was fluff and no review had any real comparisons in differences of performance or time to defrag etc..

That blog right there is a prime example of someone, anyone on the internet can post anything and without backup of proof spout off and others blindly accept that for the truth and nothing but the truth. In reality, it was fluff and no review had any real comparisons in differences of performance or time to defrag etc..

...which is exactly what's going on in this thread, and yet people are jumping right onboard without much more than reading over some marketing tripe. :laugh:

Strange thing on the European upgrade page:

http://www.diskeepereurope.com/en/01_ho/xhtml/upgrade_dk.htm

Each option is for upgrade from 10 or 2008. Presumably they mean 2007 :-)

The US upgrade page is different.

In any case 2007 pro is working fine on my XP system, can't see any reason to upgrade.

  • 2 months later...

check here http://www.lets-talk-computers.com/pastgue...ydate/index.htm for audio interviews including diskeeper and i like that dk kept my drive defragged all the time and it never got in the way but pd had to be scheduled and the offline defrags get annoying as i have to stop what i am doing and do an offline defrag and perfectdisk blatenly downplays everything diskeeper does which i think is not nice,diskeeper never says anything bad towards anyone else but pd does.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!