Need overclocking help for my Q6600 G0 & Asus P5K-E.


Recommended Posts

It's unstable even at these settings. I get blue screens in Windows Vista Ultimate x86. Bios screenshots to follow.

Jumpersettings configuration bios #1

Jumpersettings configuration bios #2

CPU Configuration Bios

Please suggest what I could try. Full system specs in sig.

post-55247-1193592928_thumb.jpg

post-55247-1193593032.jpg

post-55247-1193593101.jpg

post-55247-1193593167.jpg

Try the cpu voltage at 1.30 with everything else at auto, leave the ram as it is for now that should be fine, see where you get with that.

EDIT: set your ram to 1T for now, you can sort that out later once you get to a happy overclock with your cpu.

Edited by SIE
Try the cpu voltage at 1.30 with everything else at auto, leave the ram as it is for now that should be fine, see where you get with that.

EDIT: set your ram to 1T for now, you can sort that out later once you get to a happy overclock with your cpu.

Thanks for the suggestion. I wasn't confident enough to set the CPU voltage higher than what I had it at originally.

This is my current O/C now. Anything higher gets a blue screen.

post-55247-1193595426_thumb.jpg

Schweet, your already doing better than me, my B3 refuses to run higher than 2.8Ghz, i think it's my board though, I have to use the older P28 bios as all newer ones have issues with Raid cards :(

I'm thinking of dumping the board soon though and get an X38 one, I only had this for SLI which I can't see myself using now and to be honest it's been more trouble than it's worth, this is my second one, the first I had to rma.

You should get a bit more from upping the cpu voltage a bit more, 1.35 shouldn't be a problem, see what you can get with 1.3 if that makes you happier, on my board aswell I have to up the FSB voltage, I have it at 1.4

If it makes you feel any better this is my limit :(

post-44505-1193597277_thumb.jpg

Not to make this sound even more painful for you but I was able to reach 3.01GHz (333x9) effortlessly, with your help of course

Are you going to upgrade your board?

Also, do you think I could improve my RAM timings? What should I set them to?

Well, the spec for your RAM is 800Mhz 4-3-3-15 at 2.2v, you should manage 2.3v for a bit more, I doubt if will be able to run it at 1T at those timings, just give it a go, see how you get on.

Yeah I'll get a new board, i'm just waiting to see what the nforce 700 series has to offer but i'll probably end up getting an Intel based board, i don't think you can beat them.

Well, the spec for your RAM is 800Mhz 4-3-3-15 at 2.2v, you should manage 2.3v for a bit more, I doubt if will be able to run it at 1T at those timings, just give it a go, see how you get on.

Yeah I'll get a new board, i'm just waiting to see what the nforce 700 series has to offer but i'll probably end up getting an Intel based board, i don't think you can beat them.

Go for an ASUS

I was able to hit 4-3-3-15 for my RAM with a new Vista score of 5.8

Thanks for all the help have a good night

Sure, it's ObjectDock

You have an setup really close to mine :D ;)

Hanif, are you running any stable tests? Also are you running Stock Cooling?

Stock cooling, yes. As for stable testing, I have ran 3DMark and had it running already for a number of days w/o any issues.

Sure, it's ObjectDock

Stock cooling, yes. As for stable testing, I have ran 3DMark and had it running already for a number of days w/o any issues.

Hanif,

I know this is off-topic but what is that ObjectDock skin? That (glass) cube looks awesome. Thanks. :D

From my experience, Vista does not seem to want to overclock that high. I didn't mess with it a whole lot, though.

I'm using Vista x86 and I've overclocked my chip from 2.66GHz to 3.6GHz ;)

Hanif - i saw in your last screenshot that your RAM is at 2T now. I was going to suggest you change that to 2T w/ the higher overclock. also, what's your voltage set at in the bios now at 3GHz? cpu-z is only showing 1.3v in that screenshot. You could easily set it to 1.4v in the bios and still be ok. keep in mind that youre using stock cooling. youre reaching your limits w/ that cooling.

also, you board should have a bios setting called "voltage dampering" or something to that effect. I have mine turned on. it helps to minimize vdroop under load, thus increasing stability.

  • 9 months later...

Hi, I'm new to all this OCing - coming from Mac.

I have a P5K-E WiFi A/P - with Q600 core2 quad and 4gb of Team Xtream.

No mater what ratio I input into CPU ratio - it always defaults to X6 - when I look at it in CPUID

I see Core Speed is always changing - sometimes up to 3006.0MHz - but the multiplier is still x6

the Dram is 5 5 5 15 2T ratio 1:1

just wondering what I'm doing wrong.

Sorry - no screen grabs as I'm using a Mac keyboard and can't work out how to remap keys

Hi, I'm new to all this OCing - coming from Mac.

I have a P5K-E WiFi A/P - with Q600 core2 quad and 4gb of Team Xtream.

No mater what ratio I input into CPU ratio - it always defaults to X6 - when I look at it in CPUID

I see Core Speed is always changing - sometimes up to 3006.0MHz - but the multiplier is still x6

the Dram is 5 5 5 15 2T ratio 1:1

just wondering what I'm doing wrong.

Sorry - no screen grabs as I'm using a Mac keyboard and can't work out how to remap keys

Go in the BIOS and look under the Advanced>CPU Configuration, Disable C1E, also Disable SpeedStep if it's listed. Then you can set your CPU Ratio.

Go in the BIOS and look under the Advanced>CPU Configuration, Disable C1E, also Disable SpeedStep if it's listed. Then you can set your CPU Ratio.

Thanks crash - running @ 3.02GHz

The multiplier stays at 9 - but the freq still fluctuates a few points only

I disabled C1E - but couldn't find an entry for Speedstep

Wondering if that's what ASUS calls N.O.S - ( non-delay overclocking system) ?

OX86 loves the new tweaks too :)

Thanks crash - running @ 3.02GHz

The multiplier stays at 9 - but the freq still fluctuates a few points only

I disabled C1E - but couldn't find an entry for Speedstep

Wondering if that's what ASUS calls N.O.S - ( non-delay overclocking system) ?

OX86 loves the new tweaks too :)

There was a SpeedStep option in the older BIOS, but seems to have disappeared in the newer ones. Mine fluctuates by a couple of MHz too, so I wouldn't be too concerned about it. ;)

From my experience, Vista does not seem to want to overclock that high. I didn't mess with it a whole lot, though.

Can I ask what dock that is you're using?

vista doesnt have anything with oc

board , ram , cpu , psu , voltage are ...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!