Recommended Posts

I think Saw is far beyond a killing movie now. With Saw V this becomes more clear to me. If you are a true saw fan, you will appreciate this movie and how it linked everything together.

i totally agree!

Also agree with the advertising sucking so much....but i do think when they said about "you wont believe how it ends" they wernt talking about the film they where just talkin about the scene with the guy with his head in the box...cause i for one didnt think it was gona end that way lol

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590031782
Share on other sites

Did you ever think that the point of V was to fill the story in, and perhaps there was no way of making it thrilling like they did with the 1st two (if you get what I mean)

Nothing they filled in was really "needed". Yes, it was nice seeing some of the old characters and how far back Hoffman went, but that was a small part of the film. The main thing for the film was Strahm being framed, which was dull and boring.

I think Saw is far beyond a killing movie now. With Saw V this becomes more clear to me. If you are a true saw fan, you will appreciate this movie and how it linked everything together.

Don't question how much of a true Saw fan I am. I flew all the way to NYC for a Saw concert two years ago, I own a Saw III poster made with Tobin Bell's blood, I own t-shirts, I own the original release DVD and all of the extra releases (director's cut, unrated cut, etc.). But I didn't like this film. Does that really make me any less of a true Saw fan? Seriously.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590031872
Share on other sites

It doesn't..

Everyone has their feelings for the film. I was thinking to myself when I was watching V; Why Strahm? The film eventually grew interesting to me. I wasn't so much telling myself "this is boring" maybe because it's the first SAW film I saw in theaters and I wanted to get my money's worth :laugh:

I do agree w. you that Strahm was unnecessary. Maybe his attempt @ hunting down Hoffman opens up more portals for future releases.. who knows.

But I tell you something I did like the intro glowing text it reminded me of a Harry Potter film w/ atrocious violence :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590032272
Share on other sites

Hurmoth touched on this but now theres some more info plus a site!

capture.png

Surrey theme park Thorpe Park has revealed its new attraction will be 'Saw - The Ride', based on the super-gruesome gorebuster movie franchise of the same name.

The family-friendly frolic-enclave has run 'Fright Nights' with various scary goings-on since 2002, but the new ride seems a rather more ambitious and full-bodied attempt to incur the wrath of Responsible Parents, who are quite alright with traumatising their own children but will raise hell if anyone else tries it. The cinematic rollercoaster won't creak into action until spring 2009, but with Hallowe'en just around the corner and Saw V in cinemas on 24 October, the PR machine is rattling forth now.

Thorpe Park has worked with Lionsgate film studio on the ride, which it naturally claims will be the scariest in the world ever, like spare-pants scary. ?Anybody who has sat through a Saw film scared and terrified beyond belief will have some idea of what?s in store for them at Thorpe Park," giggled creative director Candy Holland. ?Saw ? The Ride is going to be shocking and intense, both physically and psychologically, and is sure to give you nightmares.?

Saw, a kind of Kwik Save Se7en, was released in 2004 and spawned an immensely successful franchise (the sixth instalment is on its way). Along with Eli Roth's ######-flashing-and-hamstring-slashing upsetter Hostel, it's generally considered to be one of the dubious trailblazers of the 'torture porn' horror sub-genre. However, the self-consciously shocked-and-appalled term is often somewhat inaccurate, as at no point in such movies does a swarthy moustachioed man offer to fix an impossibly-breasted woman's washing machine before putting her in it on boil wash.

The Thorpe Park terror begins with this extravagant Flash site from which the unwary are likely to run shrieking "MY EYES". A good start. The ride will feature "a 100ft vertical lift, a 100? drop ["from a height of 100ft, making it the steepest freefall drop in the world"], three inversions, and a terrifying indoor section which accounts for 30 per cent of total ride time".

The latter promises to make for a "spine-chilling queueing experience", which is surely better than the usual eye-rolling queueing experience, unless it happens to incorporate actual rolling eyes. That would be sick.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590043774
Share on other sites

Hurmoth remember you posted this in May:

SAW V Has 3 Endings for DVD?!

Then the rumors startedflying about some different filmed endings. "We actually shot threedifferent endings, they each say different things, and set up the storyfor SAW VI in different ways," Hackl tells Bloody-Disgustingexclusively. "Two of them are similar and one is very different!" Bergtells us all endings will be included on the DVD release.

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/saw-...deogame-details

So I wonder what ending we seen --- the "very different" ending? LOL

Edited by MikeW.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590055920
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, I watched it today.

I would like to say it is the best yet, but I don't really know. I sort of lost the plot of the long story surrounding all the films throughout the last incarnation of the original.

One thing that has always attracted me to the Saw films is their uniqueness from the start. They are great crime thrillers with some gruesome themes involved. Throughout the movie I was hungrily eating a cheesecake when something flashed up that was simply, off putting. However, my strong stomach prevailed and I finished my cake. So, Saw 5 - certainly good. The main game (that starts with the five keys in the boxes) was very well planned I thought. It would have been good to see some alternate solutions rather than the guys killing themselves at each game. It reminded me of the Saw film with the house - that oven still creeps me out!

Unfortunately though, what has put all the Saw films in a whirl is how each film is interconnected, but there was one, I forget if it is the third or the fourth where I completly missed how they were all supposed to work together. So it looked like the second, third and fourth films all ran at the same time, one big large game, but then the fourth film couldn't have run because they had to cut open Jigsaw to get the tape for that, but He was well and alive in the second, so yes, it got a little confusing.

However, as a single film, it was simple to follow, good to understand. I came away left feeling like I did after Saw 1 - a great film! But at the moment, that is how I will treat others, where the films are single, they do not really connect to anything else too much.

Well worth it if you like the Saw series.

Well done to the producers.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/597054-saw-v/page/11/#findComment-590287756
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!