Increasingly Complex Web Sites and Content Will Slow Us Down


Recommended Posts

The Web will start to seem pokey as early as 2010, as use of interactive and video-intensive services overwhelms local cable, phone and wireless Internet providers, a study by business technology analysts Nemertes Research has found.

"Users will experience a slow, subtle degradation, so it's back to the bad old days of dial-up," says Nemertes President Johna Till Johnson. "The cool stuff that you'll want to do will be such a pain in the rear that you won't do it."

Nemertes says that its study is the first to project traffic growth and compare it with plans to increase capacity.

The findings were embraced by the Internet Innovation Alliance (IIA), a tech industry and public interest coalition that advocates tax and spending policies that favor investments in Web capacity.

"We're not trying to play Paul Revere and say that the Internet's going to fall," says IIA co-Chairman Larry Irving. "If we make the investments we need, then people will have the Internet experience that they want and deserve."

Nemertes says that the bottleneck will be where Internet traffic goes to the home from cable companies' coaxial cable lines and the copper wires that phone companies use for DSL.

Cable and phone companies provide broadband to 60.2 million homes, accounting for about 94% of the market, according to Leichtman Research Group.

To avoid a slowdown, these companies, and increasingly, wireless services providers in North America, must invest up to $55 billion, Nemertes says. That's almost 70% more than planned.

Much of that is needed for costly running of new high-capacity lines. Verizon vz is replacing copper lines with fiber optic for its FiOS service, which has 1.3 million Internet subscribers.

Johnson says that cable operators, with 32.6 million broadband customers, also must upgrade. Most of their Internet resources now are devoted to sending data to users ? not users sending data. They'll need more capacity for the latter as more people transmit homemade music, photos and videos.

More Story at Source

well no... content is getting bigger but internet speeds and stuff are getting bigger, i like to make small sites anyway

Will the bandwidth increase fast enough for the increasing amount of content that we want? Probably not, given our somewhat dated infrastructure, and how much money they'll have to pour into it to keep up.

Will the bandwidth increase fast enough for the increasing amount of content that we want? Probably not, given our somewhat dated infrastructure, and how much money they'll have to pour into it to keep up.

Will compression technologies improve? If the infrastructure can't cope with more bandwidth, then don't make more bandwidth.. but still make more content like we are!

Sounds like a logical step to me.

Its so true though, and websites forget rural areas many of which still use dialup.

Making sites that require tons of bandwidth limits your market as people with dialup arent able to access it and i know some people still use it.

The Internet needs to be considered a part of the public infrastructure like roads, power, water, and phone. The internet does follow into telecommunications but it is not being treated with the same importance as bringing power and water to homes. I still want it to be done in the private sector but with more drive from the governments to push it to everyone. It should be a mandate just like the Manifest Destiny was in the US so long ago. Someone needs to lead the change for the people.

  • 2 weeks later...
100 megabits symmetrical for the entire USA by 2010 should have been proposed in 2000 if we had a government that worked for us.

100Mb by 2010? That would be amazing. But we won't even be close. My ISP just started offering 2048/2048 for $70/month. That's 8 megabits a second....a far cry from 100.

100 megabits symmetrical for the entire USA by 2010 should have been proposed in 2000 if we had a government that worked for us.

Too bad it's ran by a whackjob.

yea we put more content into the webpages, but the newer technology that comes out also streamlines the content. new protocols and programming languages help things get smaller and faster. and as Harreh pointed out, compression as well

countries are starting to lay down fiber optics on a massive scale as well, instead of just to a couple of neighborhoods

but if the "great slowdown" does ever happen, that'll only push countires and company's to bring everything up to date with state of the art equipment. so we win either way :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!