Windows XP SP3. Much better than Vista SP1


Recommended Posts

Also hilarious that you would trash Vista's interface. I guess you prefer the Fisher-Price style interface that looks like it's meant for 5 year olds. It would explain a whole lot, given your opinions.

Well Vista's interface is a mess. WTF are those pre Win-95 icons doing in Vista? Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

Maybe M$ better invent time machine to catch up Apple. Oh wait Apple did time machine already. :laugh:

XP + NEW UI + FATSUIT = VI$TA

The WOW Starts Now!

Well Vista's interface is a mess. WTF are those pre Win-95 icons doing in Vista? Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

Maybe M$ better invent time machine to catch up Apple. Oh wait Apple did time machine already. :laugh:

XP + NEW UI + FATSUIT = VI$TA

The WOW Starts Now!

I never said Vista's interface was perfect, but it's leaps and bounds better than XP's clunky mess. Also, replacing the S in Vista and MS with a dollar sign isn't clever or funny, it just demonstrates your lack of maturity. Transparent candybar is funny, given Leopard has a transparent bar at the top of its desktop as well.

The anti-Vista trolls on this forum would be more entertaining to debate with if their arguments weren't based in 2006.

I never said Vista's interface was perfect, but it's leaps and bounds better than XP's clunky mess. Also, replacing the S in Vista and MS with a dollar sign isn't clever or funny, it just demonstrates your lack of maturity. Transparent candybar is funny, given Leopard has a transparent bar at the top of its desktop as well.

The anti-Vista trolls on this forum would be more entertaining to debate with if their arguments weren't based in 2006.

you will never hear the end of the vista trolls, next up, the Windows 7 trolls, then windows 8. It wont go away. Some people just have to feel special by pretending they are superior to others.

Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

At least you can resize most things in Windows. Have you used OSX lately? Those dialogs that you can resize can only be resized from that one stupid corner.

Of course, this seems very off topic, and you're just flamebaiting....

Because of a continued feeling that somehow despite years of being a Windows user that somehow i'd missed out on something, I relented (for about the 5th time) and installed Vista Enterprise x64 SP1 on my work PC. It's a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, Nvidia 7600GS and a pair of 7200RPM disks in RAID0.

So far it is working out ok - the smoothest ride i've had with Vista so far after trying it on countless occasions. A few comments I feel I need to make though:

* Windows Backup just isn't a patch on Time Machine. Those who ranted on about Vista having had 'Time Machine' like features are flat out wrong. Yes I have nice nightly backups on Vista now and they seem to be working ok, but they simply are not a patch on the ease of configuration (and use) of Time Machine. Anyone who's used both will know.

* Still begrudge the hardware requirements. Massively. I'm not afraid to spend money on beefing up my PC and neither is my place of work. But i'm only JUST happy with the performance i'm getting from Vista now even with that sort of specification.

* 32bit / 64bit is a massive debacle. For Windows 7, Microsoft just need to say it's 64bit or nothing. There is no excuse any more. I genuinely feel the only reason they kept 32bit alive this long is to make the customer base as wide as possible. By Windows 7, they NEED to change this. It's a pain in the butt for experienced IT folks - I can't imagine how confusing it must be for your average home user.

All in all I still don't like Vista any more than OSX Leopard but the improvements they've made since its launch nearly 2 years ago help considerably. I personally like it purely for having a pretty version of Windows, and a version of Windows where I have recent drivers for all but the newest hardware.. I also like a handful of new features - if I wasn't an eye candy ###### I don't think i'd use it to be honest!

And for the record, yes, OSX is better than Windows. By far. In terms of being a fast, stable, accessible OS, XP and Vista are miles behind. Downside, is the lack of software in some areas. Linux has gotten pretty good too, but rough around the edges, and not for typical users.

that's because like most things with apple it only runs on a pre-set configuration. you can't start swapping out whatever you want on your mac. you buy your mac, let it sit there for wait 3-4 years and buy a new one. vista has to be able to run on anything and everything

if you don't like the interface there's these things called msstyles and they are free :rolleyes:

i have had one bsod or problem on vista. i knew i'd have to wait for my software to be vista compatible and i had the common sense to not try and run vista on 6 year old components. plus Vista x64 beats XP x64 hands down any day. the only problem i have with vista (like most people who've used it for more than a day) is the folder view bug, which ALSO exists in XP btw

* Windows Backup just isn't a patch on Time Machine. Those who ranted on about Vista having had 'Time Machine' like features are flat out wrong. Yes I have nice nightly backups on Vista now and they seem to be working ok, but they simply are not a patch on the ease of configuration (and use) of Time Machine. Anyone who's used both will know.

Who claimed that it was?

"Previous Versions" (Shadow Volume Copy) is what has similar functionality to Time Machine.

* 32bit / 64bit is a massive debacle. For Windows 7, Microsoft just need to say it's 64bit or nothing. There is no excuse any more. I genuinely feel the only reason they kept 32bit alive this long is to make the customer base as wide as possible. By Windows 7, they NEED to change this. It's a pain in the butt for experienced IT folks - I can't imagine how confusing it must be for your average home user.

Yeah. It's not like there are modern processors out there that are 32-bit only.

Oh wait! Even the first MacBook Pros had 32-bit processors in them...

Yeah. It's not like there are modern processors out there that are 32-bit only.

Oh wait! Even the first MacBook Pros had 32-bit processors in them...

Whatever you feel about Apple (positive or negative) its impossible to look at the way Windows is offered up for 32bit and 64bit systems, and compare it favourably to the way Apple handles it. For heavens sake, they can package up binaries that work on two different physical processor architectures (PPC / x86) and make them run on 32bit and 64bit CPU's. All seemlessly to the end user.

Sure, running PPC native apps under Rosetta on Intel is a little lethargic but it still works.

i totally agree. 32bit needs to die, its holding progress back and manufacturers, driver makers, hardware makes etc need to focus on 64bit. I know people say 64bit offers nothing over 32bit but i know from personal experience 2 machines with the same config/hardware/software etc and 2GB ram in each 64bit feels alot faster/smoother than 32bit. Microsoft need to grow some cahunas and end 32bit.

Whatever you feel about Apple (positive or negative) its impossible to look at the way Windows is offered up for 32bit and 64bit systems, and compare it favourably to the way Apple handles it. For heavens sake, they can package up binaries that work on two different physical processor architectures (PPC / x86) and make them run on 32bit and 64bit CPU's. All seemlessly to the end user.

Sure, running PPC native apps under Rosetta on Intel is a little lethargic but it still works.

My point had absolutely nothing to do with Apple. It was just that there are many very fast 32-bit processors out there. I just said the first gen MBPs because I thought that more people would recognize it, it would click, and they'd say "Hey. That wasn't that long ago! Those processors were only 32-bit?"

The mobile Core Duo processor does not support 64bits, and will likely be more than adequate for speed for handling Windows 7.

What's wrong with Vista? I don't see anything wrong with it. I used to get at least 4 BSOD's for absolutely no reason. When I switched to Vista, everything's perfect. No hitches, no glitches, no problems whatsoever.

There isn't anything wrong with it. The people that continue to trash it to this day either:

A) Installed it on an old computer yet expected it to be blazing fast, so OMFG VI$TA SUX!

B) Never used it themselves and go by the opinions of blogs posted in late 2006.

C) Are just clueless and have no idea what they're talking about. The sad thing is, evidently some of these types work in the computer business. I feel bad for their clients.

Interesting how i've had Vista installed since...

Windows Vista? Ultimate 64-bit SP1 Was Installed On March 20, 2007 At 3:58 AM.

Not one format, bluescreen, lockup, or problem since....

Well, no i've had tons of bluescreens, and lockups, but they were due to overclocking. And now that i've found a medium between overclocking and stability, no issues to report.

Vista has been the best OS experience i've ever had to date.

Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

my thoughts, vista is fine. i've never had a problem with vista. i have had a problem with drivers for vista, but thats a drivers issue, not vista. only reason im back on xp is because creative drivers suck for vista. but by no means is it windows vista's fault.

one thing i hate hearing about vista is that it take up to much memory and xp performs so much better, well no duh. i sure the hell hope a 7 year old program runs better then a two year old program on current hardware. when xp came out, a northwood P4 and 64-128mb of ram was typical in comuters. your saying that it runs great on a Q6700 with 2gb of ram. go run xp on that northwood with 128mb of ram, then compare it to how vista runs on a 4500 with 1gb of ram. as time goes on, the baseline for requirements goes up, thats what moore's law is all about.

theres also an arguement that vista isn't compatable with older programs. which while sometimes this is true, most of the time its because people can't right click, go to properties and set compatability modes or run as administrator. which if you turn uac off you dont have to bother ticking the "run as administrator" box. and yes UAC can be turned off. if you don't like it turn it off and quit whining.

Finally! It seems the tide is turning. :)

I felt like I was the only one enjoying Vista last year - I've had no major issues with it at all. I would go into these topics, and it seemed like everyone was ranting about how horrible it was.

Vista has been my best OS experience to date. I can't stand working on XP anymore. it just feels so old and clunky. I especially miss the start menu searchbar...

The only issues I've had were with drivers (nVidia and Creative, I'm looking at you).

Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

Surely you meant a 400 Gb HDD? :| 400 Mb is awfully small...

Um, I've been working with computers nearly all my life, and I completely disagree with your statement. I've had Vista installed since before Beta 2. The betas were slow, yes, but since the final came out, I've never looked back. I had it originally installed on a P4 2.2 Ghz CPU with 512 Mb of RAM and it worked just fine. Aero wasn't enabled, but that was perfectly OK with me.

It's great you prefer Linux, but please don't go around saying that your opinion counts more than mine or anyone else's. Whatever works for you is great! I'm glad you are able to work on an older computer - with the stuff I do, that computer simply wouldn't work for me at all.

Surely you meant a 400 Gb HDD? :| 400 Mb is awfully small...

Um, I've been working with computers nearly all my life, and I completely disagree with your statement. I've had Vista installed since before Beta 2. The betas were slow, yes, but since the final came out, I've never looked back. I had it originally installed on a P4 2.2 Ghz CPU with 512 Mb of RAM and it worked just fine. Aero wasn't enabled, but that was perfectly OK with me.

It's great you prefer Linux, but please don't go around saying that your opinion counts more than mine or anyone else's. Whatever works for you is great! I'm glad you are able to work on an older computer - with the stuff I do, that computer simply wouldn't work for me at all.

EDIT: My Windows 3.11 computer was 400MB, sorry for the confusion. My new one is 400GB lol.

You say older as if it's dated by five+ years, its two and a half years old, with recent upgrades. I was not saying that my opinion counts more than yours or anyone elses, I was saying that it counts, and that I don't fit the following criteria:

There isn't anything wrong with it. The people that continue to trash it to this day either:

A) Installed it on an old computer yet expected it to be blazing fast, so OMFG VI$TA SUX!

B) Never used it themselves and go by the opinions of blogs posted in late 2006.

C) Are just clueless and have no idea what they're talking about. The sad thing is, evidently some of these types work in the computer business. I feel bad for their clients.

I was directly responding to this one, which quite frankly I found bigoted and insulting. I should have quoted.

I wasn't expecting it to be blazing fast, I was expecting it to be fast - reasonable especially since it's been in development for so long. I think that this is reasonable. If it takes twice as long to launch IE or Notepad, VERY basic applications, this is unacceptable.

Edited by dmd3x
Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

User error. All your years of working in the IT field and with computers hasn't done you very well.

I would expect you to have an updated system at the least ........ lol.

How is it possible that one person has had a flawless experience with Vista and yet you have had nothing but problems? I'm going to go ahead and recommend you actually update your hardware. Outdated hardware with buggy drivers is not Microsoft's fault.

User error. All your years of working in the IT field and with computers hasn't done you very well.

I would expect you to have an updated system at the least ........ lol.

How is it possible that one person has had a flawless experience with Vista and yet you have had nothing but problems? I'm going to go ahead and recommend you actually update your hardware. Outdated hardware with buggy drivers is not Microsoft's fault.

It could be that I'm getting too old fashioned... my standards for legacy support (hardware that is three or less years old) is obviously no longer acceptable in the Windows world.

Edited by dmd3x
The trend seems to be, if you are a fanboy with the latest and greatest hardware you are happy as a clam. If you have a slightly aged system, you are SOL.

The key word being fanboy. I do have a newer quad core system but I still choose to run XP on it, Vista sucks in more areas than just performance imo.

Not really.......

I have Vista Business running on a 3.4E GHz Pentium 4 (prescott) with an all-in-wonder 9600 and 4gb of DDR400 ram and it runs fine as well.... lol

Seriously RAM prices are fairly cheap now a days. Try it.

I guess the "in" thing now a days is to have 2GB of RAM because of statements like "what do you need 4gb of ram for? "you should be just fine with 2gb" "4gb is overkill"

We're in 2008...Vista is the current "next-gen" OS. Why would you expect it to run anything like XP did on outdated hardware? Seriously... they call it an upgrade for a reason.

If you're going to get an OS that requires more, you should probably also get the hardware to make it run optimal....

Not really.......

I have Vista Business running on a 3.4E GHz Pentium 4 (prescott) with an all-in-wonder 9600 and 4gb of DDR400 ram and it runs fine as well.... lol

Seriously RAM prices are fairly cheap now a days. Try it.

I guess the "in" thing now a days is to have 2GB of RAM because of statements like "what do you need 4gb of ram for? "you should be just fine with 2gb" "4gb is overkill"

We're in 2008...Vista is the current "next-gen" OS. Why would you expect it to run anything like XP did on outdated hardware? Seriously... they call it an upgrade for a reason.

If you're going to get an OS that requires more, you should probably also get the hardware to make it run optimal....

It also is that my current hardware does everything I want it to do, so if an OS upgrade is going to slow everything down, it's not worth it. The thing that I find mind boggling is how much slower it is. I remember upgrading computers from Windows 95 to 98 without taking too much of a performance hit, if at all. I also remember the same thing upgrading others from 98 to 2000, or from 98 or 2000 to XP, also not significantly degrading the performance.

Picky, picky me, I suppose :-D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
    • Microsoft Weekly: Surface Laptop Ultra, Windows 11 context menus, Build 2026 recap, and more by Taras Buria This week's news recap is here, with Microsoft announcing the new Surface Laptop Ultra, fresh chips from NVIDIA for Windows on ARM, a no-build week, fixes for Windows 11's context menus, gaming news, reviews, and more. Quick links: Windows 10 and 11 Windows Insider Program Updates are available Reviews are in Gaming news Great deals to check Windows 11 and Windows 10 Here, we talk about everything happening around Microsoft's latest operating system in the Stable channel and preview builds: new features, removed features, controversies, bugs, interesting findings, and more. And, of course, you may find a word or two about older versions. At Computex 2026, together with NVIDIA, Microsoft announced the Surface Laptop Ultra, its most powerful laptop to date, powered by NVIDIA's RTX Spark processor. Details about this computer are currently scarce, as Microsoft has only revealed certain parts of its specs. So far, we know that the computer has a 15-inch mini-LED display, a rich set of ports, a powerful processor, and all-day battery life. It also comes with a new wallpaper, which you can already download here in full resolution. The Surface Laptop Studio is not the only NVIDIA-powered Surface, which Microsoft unveiled this week. At Build 2026, the company also debuted the Surface RTX Spark Dev Box, an odd-shaped desktop with a 20-core NVIDIA Grace CPU and an NVIDIA Blackwell RTX GPU with 6,144 CUDA cores and fifth-generation Tensor Cores with FP4 precision, connected via the NVIDIA NVLink-C2C chip-to-chip interconnect for high performance. According to Microsoft, it can run models with up to 120 billion parameters locally without relying on cloud GPU infrastructure. These two new Surface devices are likely to cost quite a lot, and for those who need a more affordable device, Microsoft is preparing the next-gen Qualcomm-powered Surface Pro and Surface Laptop. This week, details about these two devices leaked in plenty of detail. Other announcements at Build 2026 include the following: Microsoft unveils new security tools for IT admins and developers building AI products Microsoft announces Scout, an OpenClaw-powered personal agent for enterprise customers Microsoft unveils MAI-Thinking-1 reasoning and MAI-Code-1 coding models Microsoft announced a new Windows 11 native command-line utility Microsoft unveils Majorana 2 quantum chip, accelerating commercial timeline to 2029 Microsoft believes that AI agents will eventually replace apps through Project Solara Microsoft introduces Web IQ, a Bing-powered search system built for AI agents Last week, Microsoft released a new Experimental build, which introduced a major Start menu upgrade. It now lets you toggle off specific parts of the menu without affecting other features, resize the menu, and hide additional UI elements. We published a closer look here, so if you want to know what Microsoft is cooking without enrolling in the Insider program and installing unstable builds, check it out. Speaking of new features, many users are very annoyed about the way Microsoft delivers them. Recently, a frustrated user shared their experience with gradual rollouts, and even Microsoft engineers admitted there is a flaw in the system that prevents new features from applying properly. One of those new features includes the ability to uninstall AI models in Windows 11 with a single click. Windows 11 is finally getting fixes for its slow context menus. Marcus Ash from Microsoft confirmed that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are going to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." According to Marcus, Microsoft will share more details soon. Windows Insider Program Windows 11 preview builds, released last week, are now available for download as standalone ISO files. These days, Microsoft regularly pushes new images, allowing users to clean-install its recent Windows 11 preview builds faster and easier. If you want to try the latest Windows 11 features without jumping through the Windows Update hoops, get those new images here. Sadly, Microsoft did not release new Windows 11 preview builds this week. Come back next time. Updates are available This section covers software, firmware, and other notable updates (released and coming soon) delivering new features, security fixes, improvements, patches, and more from Microsoft and third parties. Microsoft is preparing new features for Teams. Later this month, the messenger will receive a new download manager with auto-dismissing notifications, reducing clutter and making the overall experience less annoying when dealing with downloads. Mozilla released Firefox 151.0.3, a new bug-fixing update for the browser. It is a small release, which fixes problems with pasting into text fields and the oversized VPN button on the toolbar. The update is now available for all users in the Release channel. Here are other updates and releases you may find interesting: VS Code 1.123 introduces massive upgrades for persistent AI developer workflows Microsoft OneDrive is getting a simple yet much-needed feature Microsoft faces heat after quietly blocking promised Office features on Apple systems Microsoft resumes forced Copilot app installation on some Windows PCs Browser vendors pen an open letter to Microsoft, saying "enough is enough" Here are the latest drivers and firmware updates released this week: AMD Radeon Software 26.6.1 with optimizations for F1 25: 2026 Season, World of Tanks: HEAT, and various bug fixes. Reviews are in Here is the hardware and software we reviewed this week Steven Parker dropped more mini PC reviews this week. GEEKOM Air12 2026 Edition is a low-power, affordable computer with an Intel Tiger Lake Pentium Gold processor, up to 16GB of memory, and 512GB of storage, costing just $349. It is light, quiet, energy efficient, and has modern ports on the front. However, the front-facing USB Type-C is data-only, and there are some quirks with the computer's memory, so check out the full review. The AMD RX 9070 GRE has been released worldwide, and we published a benchmark review comparing this powerful graphics card to the RX 9070 XT, 7800 XT, the NVIDIA RTX 5070, and RTX 4070. It has solid, balanced performance, plenty of RAM, and low temperatures, but watch out for mediocre ray tracing performance and not the best efficiency. Also, we reviewed the Cuktech 10 Ultra, a compact, high-power charger with four ports and a big display full of various stats. This tiny charger can pull nearly 120W and spread that power according to each connected device's needs. It also comes with a high-quality 240W cable, three power modes, and retractable prongs. The best part? It is quite affordable, just make sure you have an outlet placed in the right spot to benefit from the built-in display. On the gaming side Learn about upcoming game releases, Xbox rumors, new hardware, software updates, freebies, deals, discounts, and more. Do you remember the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally, Microsoft's first handheld console designed in partnership with ASUS? This week, ASUS revealed a new version of the device to celebrate twenty years of its Republic of Gamers brand. The new ROG Xbox Ally X20 features an OLED display, a transforming D-Pad, TMR sticks, and other changes. However, the chip inside the console is still the same. Forza Horizon 6 launched last month to critical acclaim, but the game will soon have a new rival made by those who used to work on Forza Horizon titles. Mike Brown from Maverick Games announced Clutch, an upcoming racing game with a story-driven campaign, deep car customization, and rich multiplayer. The game is coming to PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 in Spring 2027. The next update for Minecraft now has a release date. This week, Mojang announced that Chaos Cubed will be available on June 16, 2026. In addition, Mojang published a teaser of the next Minecraft movie. A Minecraft Movie Squared has now been confirmed for a release somewhere in 2027. NVIDIA GeForce Now is getting 18 new games in June. Those include Jurassic World Evolution 3, Fatekeeper, GOALS, Gothic 1 Remake, NTE: Neverness to Everness, and more. If you are a Game Pass subscriber, you can also get new games soon: Persona 5 Royal, Starseeker: Astroneer Expeditions, and more are coming to the service this month. Sumer Game Fest 2026 happened this week, where we saw plenty of new games, including Alien Isolation 2, Final Fantasy VII Remake Part 3, Gen Atlas from the Shadow of the Colossus creator, a new Cuphead game in 8-bit style, a new expansion for Mafia: The Old Country, and more. Finally, here are this week's Weekend PC Game Deals, full of discounts and the latest freebies from the Epic Games Store. Other gaming news includes the following: God of War Laufey announced, introducing Kratos' wife as the new protagonist Ori studio's No Rest for the Wicked 1.0 release and console plans announced Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine Great deals to check Every week, we cover many deals on different hardware and software. The following discounts are still available, so check them out. You might find something you want or need. Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe - $389.99 | 39% off Sonos Sub 4 - Wireless Subwoofer - $759 | 16% off Logitech MX Creative Console - $159.99 | 20% off This link will take you to other issues of the Microsoft Weekly series. You can also support Neowin by registering for a free member account or subscribing for extra member benefits, along with an ad-free tier option.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      JKR earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      275
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!