Windows XP SP3. Much better than Vista SP1


Recommended Posts

Also hilarious that you would trash Vista's interface. I guess you prefer the Fisher-Price style interface that looks like it's meant for 5 year olds. It would explain a whole lot, given your opinions.

Well Vista's interface is a mess. WTF are those pre Win-95 icons doing in Vista? Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

Maybe M$ better invent time machine to catch up Apple. Oh wait Apple did time machine already. :laugh:

XP + NEW UI + FATSUIT = VI$TA

The WOW Starts Now!

Well Vista's interface is a mess. WTF are those pre Win-95 icons doing in Vista? Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

Maybe M$ better invent time machine to catch up Apple. Oh wait Apple did time machine already. :laugh:

XP + NEW UI + FATSUIT = VI$TA

The WOW Starts Now!

I never said Vista's interface was perfect, but it's leaps and bounds better than XP's clunky mess. Also, replacing the S in Vista and MS with a dollar sign isn't clever or funny, it just demonstrates your lack of maturity. Transparent candybar is funny, given Leopard has a transparent bar at the top of its desktop as well.

The anti-Vista trolls on this forum would be more entertaining to debate with if their arguments weren't based in 2006.

I never said Vista's interface was perfect, but it's leaps and bounds better than XP's clunky mess. Also, replacing the S in Vista and MS with a dollar sign isn't clever or funny, it just demonstrates your lack of maturity. Transparent candybar is funny, given Leopard has a transparent bar at the top of its desktop as well.

The anti-Vista trolls on this forum would be more entertaining to debate with if their arguments weren't based in 2006.

you will never hear the end of the vista trolls, next up, the Windows 7 trolls, then windows 8. It wont go away. Some people just have to feel special by pretending they are superior to others.

Why does OS X look much more refined and professional than

transparent candybar-Vi$ta? Ugly dialog boxes from stoneage that you can't resize? LoL.

At least you can resize most things in Windows. Have you used OSX lately? Those dialogs that you can resize can only be resized from that one stupid corner.

Of course, this seems very off topic, and you're just flamebaiting....

Because of a continued feeling that somehow despite years of being a Windows user that somehow i'd missed out on something, I relented (for about the 5th time) and installed Vista Enterprise x64 SP1 on my work PC. It's a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, Nvidia 7600GS and a pair of 7200RPM disks in RAID0.

So far it is working out ok - the smoothest ride i've had with Vista so far after trying it on countless occasions. A few comments I feel I need to make though:

* Windows Backup just isn't a patch on Time Machine. Those who ranted on about Vista having had 'Time Machine' like features are flat out wrong. Yes I have nice nightly backups on Vista now and they seem to be working ok, but they simply are not a patch on the ease of configuration (and use) of Time Machine. Anyone who's used both will know.

* Still begrudge the hardware requirements. Massively. I'm not afraid to spend money on beefing up my PC and neither is my place of work. But i'm only JUST happy with the performance i'm getting from Vista now even with that sort of specification.

* 32bit / 64bit is a massive debacle. For Windows 7, Microsoft just need to say it's 64bit or nothing. There is no excuse any more. I genuinely feel the only reason they kept 32bit alive this long is to make the customer base as wide as possible. By Windows 7, they NEED to change this. It's a pain in the butt for experienced IT folks - I can't imagine how confusing it must be for your average home user.

All in all I still don't like Vista any more than OSX Leopard but the improvements they've made since its launch nearly 2 years ago help considerably. I personally like it purely for having a pretty version of Windows, and a version of Windows where I have recent drivers for all but the newest hardware.. I also like a handful of new features - if I wasn't an eye candy ###### I don't think i'd use it to be honest!

And for the record, yes, OSX is better than Windows. By far. In terms of being a fast, stable, accessible OS, XP and Vista are miles behind. Downside, is the lack of software in some areas. Linux has gotten pretty good too, but rough around the edges, and not for typical users.

that's because like most things with apple it only runs on a pre-set configuration. you can't start swapping out whatever you want on your mac. you buy your mac, let it sit there for wait 3-4 years and buy a new one. vista has to be able to run on anything and everything

if you don't like the interface there's these things called msstyles and they are free :rolleyes:

i have had one bsod or problem on vista. i knew i'd have to wait for my software to be vista compatible and i had the common sense to not try and run vista on 6 year old components. plus Vista x64 beats XP x64 hands down any day. the only problem i have with vista (like most people who've used it for more than a day) is the folder view bug, which ALSO exists in XP btw

* Windows Backup just isn't a patch on Time Machine. Those who ranted on about Vista having had 'Time Machine' like features are flat out wrong. Yes I have nice nightly backups on Vista now and they seem to be working ok, but they simply are not a patch on the ease of configuration (and use) of Time Machine. Anyone who's used both will know.

Who claimed that it was?

"Previous Versions" (Shadow Volume Copy) is what has similar functionality to Time Machine.

* 32bit / 64bit is a massive debacle. For Windows 7, Microsoft just need to say it's 64bit or nothing. There is no excuse any more. I genuinely feel the only reason they kept 32bit alive this long is to make the customer base as wide as possible. By Windows 7, they NEED to change this. It's a pain in the butt for experienced IT folks - I can't imagine how confusing it must be for your average home user.

Yeah. It's not like there are modern processors out there that are 32-bit only.

Oh wait! Even the first MacBook Pros had 32-bit processors in them...

Yeah. It's not like there are modern processors out there that are 32-bit only.

Oh wait! Even the first MacBook Pros had 32-bit processors in them...

Whatever you feel about Apple (positive or negative) its impossible to look at the way Windows is offered up for 32bit and 64bit systems, and compare it favourably to the way Apple handles it. For heavens sake, they can package up binaries that work on two different physical processor architectures (PPC / x86) and make them run on 32bit and 64bit CPU's. All seemlessly to the end user.

Sure, running PPC native apps under Rosetta on Intel is a little lethargic but it still works.

i totally agree. 32bit needs to die, its holding progress back and manufacturers, driver makers, hardware makes etc need to focus on 64bit. I know people say 64bit offers nothing over 32bit but i know from personal experience 2 machines with the same config/hardware/software etc and 2GB ram in each 64bit feels alot faster/smoother than 32bit. Microsoft need to grow some cahunas and end 32bit.

Whatever you feel about Apple (positive or negative) its impossible to look at the way Windows is offered up for 32bit and 64bit systems, and compare it favourably to the way Apple handles it. For heavens sake, they can package up binaries that work on two different physical processor architectures (PPC / x86) and make them run on 32bit and 64bit CPU's. All seemlessly to the end user.

Sure, running PPC native apps under Rosetta on Intel is a little lethargic but it still works.

My point had absolutely nothing to do with Apple. It was just that there are many very fast 32-bit processors out there. I just said the first gen MBPs because I thought that more people would recognize it, it would click, and they'd say "Hey. That wasn't that long ago! Those processors were only 32-bit?"

The mobile Core Duo processor does not support 64bits, and will likely be more than adequate for speed for handling Windows 7.

What's wrong with Vista? I don't see anything wrong with it. I used to get at least 4 BSOD's for absolutely no reason. When I switched to Vista, everything's perfect. No hitches, no glitches, no problems whatsoever.

There isn't anything wrong with it. The people that continue to trash it to this day either:

A) Installed it on an old computer yet expected it to be blazing fast, so OMFG VI$TA SUX!

B) Never used it themselves and go by the opinions of blogs posted in late 2006.

C) Are just clueless and have no idea what they're talking about. The sad thing is, evidently some of these types work in the computer business. I feel bad for their clients.

Interesting how i've had Vista installed since...

Windows Vista? Ultimate 64-bit SP1 Was Installed On March 20, 2007 At 3:58 AM.

Not one format, bluescreen, lockup, or problem since....

Well, no i've had tons of bluescreens, and lockups, but they were due to overclocking. And now that i've found a medium between overclocking and stability, no issues to report.

Vista has been the best OS experience i've ever had to date.

Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

my thoughts, vista is fine. i've never had a problem with vista. i have had a problem with drivers for vista, but thats a drivers issue, not vista. only reason im back on xp is because creative drivers suck for vista. but by no means is it windows vista's fault.

one thing i hate hearing about vista is that it take up to much memory and xp performs so much better, well no duh. i sure the hell hope a 7 year old program runs better then a two year old program on current hardware. when xp came out, a northwood P4 and 64-128mb of ram was typical in comuters. your saying that it runs great on a Q6700 with 2gb of ram. go run xp on that northwood with 128mb of ram, then compare it to how vista runs on a 4500 with 1gb of ram. as time goes on, the baseline for requirements goes up, thats what moore's law is all about.

theres also an arguement that vista isn't compatable with older programs. which while sometimes this is true, most of the time its because people can't right click, go to properties and set compatability modes or run as administrator. which if you turn uac off you dont have to bother ticking the "run as administrator" box. and yes UAC can be turned off. if you don't like it turn it off and quit whining.

Finally! It seems the tide is turning. :)

I felt like I was the only one enjoying Vista last year - I've had no major issues with it at all. I would go into these topics, and it seemed like everyone was ranting about how horrible it was.

Vista has been my best OS experience to date. I can't stand working on XP anymore. it just feels so old and clunky. I especially miss the start menu searchbar...

The only issues I've had were with drivers (nVidia and Creative, I'm looking at you).

Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

Surely you meant a 400 Gb HDD? :| 400 Mb is awfully small...

Um, I've been working with computers nearly all my life, and I completely disagree with your statement. I've had Vista installed since before Beta 2. The betas were slow, yes, but since the final came out, I've never looked back. I had it originally installed on a P4 2.2 Ghz CPU with 512 Mb of RAM and it worked just fine. Aero wasn't enabled, but that was perfectly OK with me.

It's great you prefer Linux, but please don't go around saying that your opinion counts more than mine or anyone else's. Whatever works for you is great! I'm glad you are able to work on an older computer - with the stuff I do, that computer simply wouldn't work for me at all.

Surely you meant a 400 Gb HDD? :| 400 Mb is awfully small...

Um, I've been working with computers nearly all my life, and I completely disagree with your statement. I've had Vista installed since before Beta 2. The betas were slow, yes, but since the final came out, I've never looked back. I had it originally installed on a P4 2.2 Ghz CPU with 512 Mb of RAM and it worked just fine. Aero wasn't enabled, but that was perfectly OK with me.

It's great you prefer Linux, but please don't go around saying that your opinion counts more than mine or anyone else's. Whatever works for you is great! I'm glad you are able to work on an older computer - with the stuff I do, that computer simply wouldn't work for me at all.

EDIT: My Windows 3.11 computer was 400MB, sorry for the confusion. My new one is 400GB lol.

You say older as if it's dated by five+ years, its two and a half years old, with recent upgrades. I was not saying that my opinion counts more than yours or anyone elses, I was saying that it counts, and that I don't fit the following criteria:

There isn't anything wrong with it. The people that continue to trash it to this day either:

A) Installed it on an old computer yet expected it to be blazing fast, so OMFG VI$TA SUX!

B) Never used it themselves and go by the opinions of blogs posted in late 2006.

C) Are just clueless and have no idea what they're talking about. The sad thing is, evidently some of these types work in the computer business. I feel bad for their clients.

I was directly responding to this one, which quite frankly I found bigoted and insulting. I should have quoted.

I wasn't expecting it to be blazing fast, I was expecting it to be fast - reasonable especially since it's been in development for so long. I think that this is reasonable. If it takes twice as long to launch IE or Notepad, VERY basic applications, this is unacceptable.

Edited by dmd3x
Of course, it's impossible that anyone with actual I.T. skills or knowledge knows anything about how much Vista is a lemon. After all, they are only computer geeks who spend their lives on computers right?

Oh, I forgot. Computer geeks minus the irritating "fanboy" attributes. :p

I have used Vista while it was in Beta, while it was Gold and SP1. I was excited for it to come out even, but I found out that it still sucks. I'm glad that it works on your Dual Core system with 4GB RAM, but it should work fine on my Pentium 4 1.6GHz 2GB RAM with 400MB HD and ATI Radeon 9000 video. No, that's not screaming specs but it should be enough for a basic operating system to at least work fine. Yes, I've downloaded the latest drivers and it still dogs. I have been working in I.T. for six years, and have been a hobbiest since 1992, starting with DOS and then Windows 3.11, and Slackware Linux. I have been pretty satisfied with Windows, although Linux is my preference. Windows 95, Windows 2000 and Windows XP are among my favorites (2000 Server and 2003 Server for servers, didn't like NT 4.0 too much). Windows Me and Windows Vista I absolutely detest. But what do I know? I only spend my life on computers.

User error. All your years of working in the IT field and with computers hasn't done you very well.

I would expect you to have an updated system at the least ........ lol.

How is it possible that one person has had a flawless experience with Vista and yet you have had nothing but problems? I'm going to go ahead and recommend you actually update your hardware. Outdated hardware with buggy drivers is not Microsoft's fault.

User error. All your years of working in the IT field and with computers hasn't done you very well.

I would expect you to have an updated system at the least ........ lol.

How is it possible that one person has had a flawless experience with Vista and yet you have had nothing but problems? I'm going to go ahead and recommend you actually update your hardware. Outdated hardware with buggy drivers is not Microsoft's fault.

It could be that I'm getting too old fashioned... my standards for legacy support (hardware that is three or less years old) is obviously no longer acceptable in the Windows world.

Edited by dmd3x
The trend seems to be, if you are a fanboy with the latest and greatest hardware you are happy as a clam. If you have a slightly aged system, you are SOL.

The key word being fanboy. I do have a newer quad core system but I still choose to run XP on it, Vista sucks in more areas than just performance imo.

Not really.......

I have Vista Business running on a 3.4E GHz Pentium 4 (prescott) with an all-in-wonder 9600 and 4gb of DDR400 ram and it runs fine as well.... lol

Seriously RAM prices are fairly cheap now a days. Try it.

I guess the "in" thing now a days is to have 2GB of RAM because of statements like "what do you need 4gb of ram for? "you should be just fine with 2gb" "4gb is overkill"

We're in 2008...Vista is the current "next-gen" OS. Why would you expect it to run anything like XP did on outdated hardware? Seriously... they call it an upgrade for a reason.

If you're going to get an OS that requires more, you should probably also get the hardware to make it run optimal....

Not really.......

I have Vista Business running on a 3.4E GHz Pentium 4 (prescott) with an all-in-wonder 9600 and 4gb of DDR400 ram and it runs fine as well.... lol

Seriously RAM prices are fairly cheap now a days. Try it.

I guess the "in" thing now a days is to have 2GB of RAM because of statements like "what do you need 4gb of ram for? "you should be just fine with 2gb" "4gb is overkill"

We're in 2008...Vista is the current "next-gen" OS. Why would you expect it to run anything like XP did on outdated hardware? Seriously... they call it an upgrade for a reason.

If you're going to get an OS that requires more, you should probably also get the hardware to make it run optimal....

It also is that my current hardware does everything I want it to do, so if an OS upgrade is going to slow everything down, it's not worth it. The thing that I find mind boggling is how much slower it is. I remember upgrading computers from Windows 95 to 98 without taking too much of a performance hit, if at all. I also remember the same thing upgrading others from 98 to 2000, or from 98 or 2000 to XP, also not significantly degrading the performance.

Picky, picky me, I suppose :-D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!