CNet rates Vista one of "worst products in history"


Recommended Posts

Let's face reality folks. Vista was not what we expected it to be. The OS needs a lot of work. It has a lot of bugs, the system requirements are simply ridiculous and abusive. You basically need a new PC to run the darn thing. Trying to find things in Vista takes forever. XP is way faster and easier to use than Vista. Why do you think Microsoft is releasing Windows 7 in 2010 instead of 2013 or 2014? (remember Windows ME?) They know they messed up big time and they know most people are not happy with Vista, especially companies such as Acer and Dell. I have tried many times to upgrade to Vista but I seem to keep going back to XP everytime just because I can't find anything on Vista and I simply hate the way it runs...slow.

Lets face it, there is an uninformed opinion from someone who never gave it a chance.

- XP had alot of bugs and quite honestly, no bug is stopping me from using it productively day in day out

- You can go back to the classic theme if your computer isn't up to the task. Its quite funny really that my crappy Acer laptop runs it with aero on just fine.

- You don't need a new pc to run it, but even if that was the case whats the problem? Should technology just stop so you have nothing to whine about? Geez.

- Trying to find things in Vista takes forever? That to me is proof positive that you haven't even used it. Christ.

- Anyone who compares ME to Vista doesn't clearly understand the huge differences in circumstances and the products.

- XP had alot of bugs and quite honestly, no bug is stopping me from using it productively day in day out

You != The world. For some of us, software incompatibilities or hardware problems can be a show stopper. Most of my software from 2k worked fine in XP - however now in Vista this is not true anymore.

You can go back to the classic theme if your computer isn't up to the task. Its quite funny really that my crappy Acer laptop runs it with aero on just fine.

This, however, does not fix the fact that Vista is butt ugly and even when fine tuned (Such as removing the extra padding in Windows) it still takes too much space and looks like baby vomit.

You don't need a new pc to run it, but even if that was the case whats the problem? Should technology just stop so you have nothing to whine about? Geez.

Apple managed to make Leopard run BETTER than previous versions and managed to add more "candy" as well. Just because you're adding more features doesn't mean the system slows down to a halt.

Anyone who compares ME to Vista doesn't clearly understand the huge differences in circumstances and the products.

In a way true - Vista introduced lots of new things. Unfortunately they're not much use and tend to get in the way of working. However, the amount of issues I've faced with Vista implementation in businesses is directly comparable to Windows ME - they both share one thing in common: A lot of people despise them - and I'm not talking about your average Joe the shoesalesman who doesn't have a clue what the computer is running but hardcore long time computer vets who've seen every Windows migration so far, from the horrible 1 to 3.1/3.11WfW (which make dove scry) and 95/98 to 2k transitions.

And let's not forget something - computers are meant to make things easier, faster and simpler. Vista does pretty much everything the opposite.

Apple managed to make Leopard run BETTER than previous versions and managed to add more "candy" as well. Just because you're adding more features doesn't mean the system slows down to a halt.

Many Mac users are complaining about many of the same complaints that are being said about Vista.

Honestly, I guarantee there was this much initial resentment for XP when it first came out, but back in 2001, there still weren't many voices on the Internet. But once Vista got released earlier this year, we had blogs, YouTube, etc. What we are still seeing are an extreme minority that is very vocal. The majority of Vista users no doubt have no issues with it. And this will be proven come 2009 when Windows 7 is released. We will see all these "Vista is fine, keep it going!" campaigns.

This has happened with every single release of Windows, and even Mac OS X. (There are so many "downgrade stories" of people going back to Tiger.

Instead of posting articles about Vista being all bad and horrible because of the security and restrictions, why not create and post a tutorial to make Vista more XP-like? It's entirely possible to do (I've done it). Here, I'll do it for you...

1) Enable and use the administrator account.

2) Disable User Account Control completely.

3) Edit the settings of folder views and apply it to all folders (making icons smaller by holding CTRL and using the scroll wheel).

4) Disable Windows Aero (optional, but helps).

5) Tweak and disable/set to manual unneeded services.

There you go, Windows Vista acting more Windows XP-like. It'll run programs like XP can, and maybe, just maybe without encountering problems because of UAC and restricted permissions. Tada, it's quite nice this way other than the old way. Vista isn't that bad when you customize it for yourself. Shame Microsoft didn't allow it to be this way. =\

Just my two cents.

This has happened with every single release of Windows, and even Mac OS X. (There are so many "downgrade stories" of people going back to Tiger.
Where are those stories about OS X? :laugh: There are plenty of people who have problems with newer operating systems, but the backlash is not even comparable to Vista.
Where are those stories about OS X? :laugh: There are plenty of people who have problems with newer operating systems, but the backlash is not even comparable to Vista.

Enjoy.

You don't hear many negative stories about Apple simply because most people don't seem to think that posting said story is worth dealing with the deluge of rabid backlash they'll recieve.

Enjoy.

You don't hear many negative stories about Apple simply because most people don't seem to think that posting said story is worth dealing with the deluge of rabid backlash they'll recieve.

The question though was where's the stories of users switching back to Tiger? Ratio wise, I highly DOUBT you'll come close to the amount of users who either want to or actually have switched back to XP. Furthermore, look at Tiger's discussion, http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=160, over 7000 threads there. Big deal, that doesn't mean every single user wants to switch back to Panther. It just means people are having issues, some could be minor some could be huge some could be just user error. Showing me a forum of potential problems does prove there's this HUGE backlash of users wanting to switch back to Tiger.

The question though was where's the stories of users switching back to Tiger? Ratio wise, I highly DOUBT you'll come close to the amount of users who either want to or actually have switched back to XP. Furthermore, look at Tiger's discussion, http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=160, over 7000 threads there. Big deal, that doesn't mean every single user wants to switch back to Panther. It just means people are having issues, some could be minor some could be huge some could be just user error. Showing me a forum of potential problems does prove there's this HUGE backlash of users wanting to switch back to Tiger.

Even if there were, you'd never hear about it. The Mac community does a tidy job of censoring itself.

Even if there were, you'd never hear about it. The Mac community does a tidy job of censoring itself.

Oh come on. I even complained loudly about Leopard and the Graphics issues I were having when Leopard first came out. It actually turned out to be a Firmware issue, but I still complained. Read through this. There's plenty of people complaining, but people aren't switching back because there aren't major issues like what Vista users would want people to think. Vista has major issues, Leopard (despite what Vista users would like to see happen) doesn't have those major issues.

OS X doesn't have the annoying UAC, it has Cover Flow built into the Finder, has a beautiful new UI, Time Machine (which is extremely user friendly and has a nice UI unlike Shadow Copy). OS X just works, Vista does not.

coming from a tester imo, vista is great and fast in the "just using it" sense though it could be alot better. but when it comes down to things like gaming and other more intense things its lacking badly i do not expect it to get any better. i would say vista is fine for eye candy and browsing the web watching movies listening to music and checking your emails, anything beyond that it and it turns to rubbish. I prefer windows XP because it doesn't give you this half the cake quality performance. maybe it's better for brand spanking new top of the line hardware but i wouldn't expect much from it though i'll have to wait and see once upgrade time comes around.

You have to admit it, whether or not you like Vista, MS did a great thing with SP2 for XP and really made it an operating system to be proud of. I'm hoping Vista matures as finely as XP did. Then again, XP had a lot of time and MS needed to kick it up because of delays in Vista's development.

if cnet gave vista this title solely on the lack of adoption, they are sadly mistaken (or they were paid under the table to make this claim)

You don't have to pay anyone to find many shortcomings with Vista, it just isn't that great.

When you know how to use a computer, Vista "just works," as well.

Right :laugh: Are you insinuating something there? I know computers, I've been in the IT field for years now. Vista doesn't work, not the way it should, but I'm tired of this argument, it bores me now. I've said my peace about the POS that Vista is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!