AT&T Kills iPhone Plans For Deaf Thanks To Non-Deaf Douchebags


Recommended Posts

Wow, that's some winner logic you got there.

Apparently it is.

It's not the same what so ever. It means users who dont want to use the iPhone for the phone functionality can get it to use other services.

If people don't want to use the iPhone for the phone functionality, why not just get an iTouch? That's what it's there for. It's for people who want the full advantages of the iPhone, minus the phone. Plus, it's much better than trying to take advantage of a plan that's only for the hearing impaired.

Does AT&T offer it's hearing impaired plan to anyone for any other phone? Didn't think so. So why is it such a big deal with the iPhone? Oh right, people just want to rip a company off, save a buck, and look trendy with their crippled iPhone while doing it. Sad.

Edited by Ruiz
Apparently it is.

If people don't want to use the iPhone for the phone functionality, why not just get an iTouch? That's what it's there for. It's for people who want the full advantages of the iPhone, minus the phone. Plus, it's much better than trying to take advantage of a plan that's only for the hearing impaired.

iTouch = no text messaging.

People (deaf or not) obviously want text messaging.

iTouch = no text messaging.

People (deaf or not) obviously want text messaging.

Like I said, an iTouch is an iPhone minus the phone features. Text messaging is a phone feature.

$30 a month for text messaging? That's about $360 with a 2-year contract before taxes. You can buy another iTouch for that much money. Cmon now, save some money, connect to a Wi-Fi spot, and send an email or something.

If people don't want to use the iPhone for the phone functionality, why not just get an iTouch? That's what it's there for. It's for people who want the full advantages of the iPhone, minus the phone. Plus, it's much better than trying to take advantage of a plan that's only for the hearing impaired.

Does AT&T offer it's hearing impaired plan to anyone for any other phone? Didn't think so. So why is it such a big deal with the iPhone? Oh right, people just want to rip a company off, save a buck, and look trendy with their crippled iPhone while doing it. Sad.

What's sad is you thinking the consumer is in the wrong for wanting options. On the concept of people ripping off a company, now that's just funny. You sure you don't work for AT&T?

I think that they should i mean for people who have hearing disabilities; The for the none hearing disabled I think there should be a plan but little more spendy (like 5 USD more) if you don't like it too bad. what about those handicapped parking spaces do you want to talk those away too? No. I think people who physical can't use or barely can use it should be able to have such plans.

Does AT&T offer it's hearing impaired plan to anyone for any other phone? Didn't think so. So why is it such a big deal with the iPhone? Oh right, people just want to rip a company off, save a buck, and look trendy with their crippled iPhone while doing it. Sad.

But then again, phone's aren't marketable to people who are hearing impaired, right? so what's the point if nobody's gonna use the phone as a phone? The iPhone data plan means that it's being used like a Broadband card - something that's data plan only, except they are also paying for the iPhone. That makes more money than renting out a broadband card, since people don't buy laptops from ATT. iPhones are almost as capable as computers, except with limitations and the ability to data transfer. Who would use their laptop to make a call? So why force those people to use voice if they don't WANT to, when they want to text only? Remember that the iPhone is not just a phone (according to apple) but an iPod, and a browser.

Like I said, an iTouch is an iPhone minus the phone features. Text messaging is a phone feature.

$30 a month for text messaging? That's about $360 with a 2-year contract before taxes. You can buy another iTouch for that much money. Cmon now, save some money, connect to a Wi-Fi spot, and send an email or something.

Seriously? what happens if they don't have any hotspots to mooch wifi from? Then how would they be able to call? Because the iPod Touch does not offer Text, and the iPhone does. Text Messages couldn't be sent without the data call, and iPod Touch doesn't have that capability, only wifi. Also, not all people can afford the huge bill for checking their email on their phone.

Shouldn't a person only have to pay for what he uses? Many people don't even use their cells for voice, but for the text and data plans. Forcing someone to pay for what they don't use is unethical.

Edited by the_rac3
Shouldn't a person only have to pay for what he uses? Many people don't even use their cells for voice, but for the text and data plans. Forcing someone to pay for what they don't use is unethical.
I think this is what it comes down to. Noone wants to deny Deaf people the plan, not at all. But it's more a critical look at what plans should have been offered from day one. Many people could likely benefit from a data only plan regardless of whether they are deaf or not. It would be good for everyone to have the option and ultimatly, while it may mean some customers may pay less, it could also win them new customers too.

Damn, cant believe I am about to defend AT&T...I feel dirty.

the way I see it is this:

AT&T are not obligated to give out data only plans. The plan they did introduce was to cater to a new market a.k.a. the deaf. This plan made sense, since it would benefit the deaf and the company. Deaf people would have a lower subscription, and the company makes money they otherwise would not have made.

Quote - (Ruiz @ Dec 2 2007, 03:33)

Does AT&T offer it's hearing impaired plan to anyone for any other phone? Didn't think so. So why is it such a big deal with the iPhone? Oh right, people just want to rip a company off, save a buck, and look trendy with their crippled iPhone while doing it. Sad.

This is what ****es me off...If you cant afford the phone, or dont want to pay the high price, thne get another F@#$%$#^ phone. Dont bitch about someone else getting the phone for a lower price overall. These guys that complained are like kids...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Saluton, Paŭlo. Dankon pro la ĉefartikolo. Ĝi estis interesa. Mi esploros pli pri la aplikaĵo kaj ĝia koncepto. Kompreneble, se vi konas min entute, vi scias, ke mi dirus, ke viaj artikoloj bezonas iom da redaktado! Mi ĉiam faras tion, ĉu ne? Ekzemple, la artikolo foje mencias koncepton antaŭ ol difini ĝin, ekzemple, relajsoj.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!