Heroes Volume 3 : Villains


Recommended Posts

Sylar cut off her nerve-endings which is why she can't feel pain anymore.
It was never addressed that Sylar cut off Claire's nerve ending.

The way I understood it was that the things Sylar was touching didn't have nerve endings, and that's why Claire couldn't feel when he was feeling around her brain.

That made me :laugh:

Yea he is a bit like antman, do you think over the season he is going to turn weird tho...or maybe into

uluru.jpg

ok its a long shot!

I'm pretty sure the writers said Uluru was only for the comics and would never show up in the tv show.

I'm finding that the story is getting sillier and sillier

1. Claire losing ability to feel pain - Even if Sylar removed all her nerve endings, couldn't she just regenerate them back?

2. Nathan becoming some religious fanatic - He's got Adam's blood, he can heal, it isn't some miracle. Why the theatrics?

3. Future Peter angry with himself for causing Sylar to steal Claire's power - Um, hello, time travel? Heard of it. Go back and "save the cheerleader and save the world"

4. Hiro chasing down Daphne to get back formula - Ditto #3. Go back in time, get formula in safe days/weeks before event. Why even bother with the chase?

for 1, it is probably just the next evolution of her power that Sylar helped trigger. Remember Parkman was only able to hear thoughts at first but his power is evolving. In fact he'll probably have it grow even more. I wouldn't be surprised if Peter's ability to move people to another body was from an evolved version of Parkman's ability.

For number 3 and 4, I guess you missed the whole point of the first episode. Going back in time may correct what you wanted, but will end up changing things and possibly making them worse(ie, Sylar getting Clair's ability and villains just as bad as Sylar released to kill).

what about mohinder? hes got grow spikes on back power or something now. but mrs petrelli has something else with how she speaks going on there.

Just to clarify, the things on Mohinder's back are scales. It was said so by the director.

1. Claire could feel pain until Sylar went poking around in her brain with his finger. Before that she was making noises of pain/physical discomfort as Sylar was slamming her into the walls and as he was cutting her skull off. When Sylar stole her power, he also messed her up by stealing her ability to feel physical pain.

2. Mohinders' original serum sample (the one he mixed with Mayas' blood sample to make a "pure" serum that will give anyone powers) was hidden in a glass tank occupied by a gekko or iguana. And, to me at least, Mohinders' skin looked more like he was growing scales, and I immediately thought maybe the serum hidden in the reptile tank may have somehow gotten contaminated? Maybe? Long-shot, I know...but his skin and what he pulled off...certainly resembled scales.

3. As for Nikki/Jessica/Tracy...did anybody happen to see if she had the tattoo on the back of her right shoulder, cuz I didn't see it. Hmmm?

Just my lame-brained thoughts on the first shows of the season.

Tatiania

Nikki IS dead - if you go to the directors blog at http://gregbeeman.blogspot.com/2008/09/bee...-episode-2.html and look at the photos one of the comments is

"ALI LARTER AS TRACY (YEP, NIKI'S REALLY DEAD) AND GOVERNOR BRUCE BOXLEITNER"

Sylar said that Claire cannot die. If that is so, what was all that 'Save the cheerleader' crap in season 1. They should have left on her own and waited for Sylar to find the truth. Nothing would have happened.

in season 1 Sylar was originally "the bomb"... remember Future Hiro said he stabbed Sylar but he regenerated because he had Claire's power... once Claire was saved... Peter became the bomb... saving the cheerleader stopped Sylar from getting her power then.

Question: Heroes premiere rocked! Scoop? -- Doug

Ausiello: Sure did. Too bad 25 percent fewer people saw it. Now, this next tidbit isn't so much a scoop as it is an interesting behind-the-scenes nugget that has "cocktail party chatter" written all over it. The reason Kristen Bell's TV papa spent the entire episode (okay, two scenes) sitting in a chair was because his portrayer, Stephen Tobolowsky, broke his neck horse-riding in Iceland. "He had to shoot all his scenes in the chair looking face-forward," whispers my Heroes tipster. "He took his neck brace off only when the cameras were rolling." Thanks to Sylar's handiwork, Tobolowsky's injury is not expected to have any further impact on production.

Yeah he has 2 he is a blocker and a remover.

i think it's only one power, he can block other's powers by blocking the part of the brain that uses it, and erase ppl minds. it's clear now that the brain controls the power (the Sylar-Claire meeting has cleared this),

it's just my opinion.

the thing about the first season, Clair was not dead in the future, she died when she went to visit Nathan/Sylar. so she could be immortal even in first season.

just my thoughts. btw i haven't seen the 2 episodes yet, i have to wait till the weekend and it's really B@@@@ing!!!

in season 1 Sylar was originally "the bomb"... remember Future Hiro said he stabbed Sylar but he regenerated because he had Claire's power... once Claire was saved... Peter became the bomb... saving the cheerleader stopped Sylar from getting her power then.

Not true. This was discussed greatly during season one. Peter was always the bomb.

I didn't like the premiere. It seems to me they continue to use the same things over and over. I'm tired of Sylar being the bad guy. Just, well, I found the premiere boring personally. It is unusual for me to be looking at the clock during a show, but I kept going back to it think, "is this over yet."

I got this impression from the whole Sylar/Claire thing. And please correct me if you think I'm wrong. My assumption was that while he was tinkering in her brain, he was fixing her like he might fix a clock/watch. I thought he fixed her power so it essentially has no drawback, now she is truly invincible since she cannot feel pain and cannot be killed. I always believed Sylar didn't kill people because he liked to, but because that was logically happened after you removed someone's skull. It just seemed to me like he was putting her back together the way she should be like fixing the clock.

care to elaborate... i know its been a while since i last saw 5 years gone but i thought that was the case.....

The original timeline went something like this:

Fight is happening at the plaza.

Hiro stabs Sylar, he regenerates.

Something happens to Hiro (teleport?) So he doesn't see Peter fight Sylar.

Sylar and Peter fight. Peter gets 'overwhelmed' and explodes.

Sylar kills Nathan and takes over as Nathan.

Peter goes into hiding ashamed of what he did, not telling anyone what happened.

Hiro goes back in time with 'save the cheerleader, save the world'.

I didn't like the premiere. It seems to me they continue to use the same things over and over. I'm tired of Sylar being the bad guy. Just, well, I found the premiere boring personally. It is unusual for me to be looking at the clock during a show, but I kept going back to it think, "is this over yet."

You're not alone. I don't know if 'boring' was the word I would use, but it just wasn't that enjoyable to me.

If Nathan continues the whole 'i love jesus' thing past a few episodes, I won't watch anymore.

So, this whole time "Save the cheerleader. Save the world" thing really meant "Prevent Sylar from getting Claire's ability". What about the whole thing about being able to kill Claire provided you get her weak spot. If I remember correctly, there was an episode where it was mentioned that if Claire or Adam were to be shot in the head, they'd die. I guess that the brain really is the centre of people's abilities in Heroes.

It all makes sense now. Remember when Claire had that piece of wood in her head? She couldn't heal until it was removed. That stresses how important the brain is when it comes to abilities. Also, we all know the Haitian is able to nullify people's abilities by being around them because his ability is to affect the biochemistry of the brain. Again stressing how important the brain is in terms of abilities.

As for Mohinder, he seems to be turning into some sort of animal.

Victoria Pratt said that the only way to be sure to kill Adam is to take his head completely off. Its unknown if this applies to Claire or not. Reason stands that it does, but her ability is at least slightly different from Adam's now.

Yeah we saw that in Angelas dream Knox took her head off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • make your own notch - it's not that hard
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!