Heroes Volume 3 : Villains


Recommended Posts

I read the plot details and I was a little off because Peter's memory recovery needs clarification. He fully recovered his memory after meeting with Adam, but he did remember who his mom was (thus a partial recovery) in the future, before meeting Adam. So...... :unsure:

Edit: Basically waht SOOPRcow said :p

yea... seems the memory recovery with his mom was strictly to know that Angela was his mom and Nathan was his brother...

I was just doing some thinking about the future and have a theory that we have had two different futures. In one future, the one the season opened up with, we have people with abilities that are hunted down as a consequence of Nathan's press conference revelation. In the future that Hiro saw, it appeared that anyone could have had powers because we have seen 1) Mohinder create a serum to expose abilities and 2) Ando killing Hiro with his own power, which to me says that the future has changed drastically already and obviously revolves around the formula. The argument could be made that Mohinder probably would have done this anyhow (giving people powers), but it's feasible to think that Nathan revealing that he could fly could have resulted in Mohinder's research from not progressing to the point of giving people abilities. As it stands, we don't know that the future Peter came from is the same as the one Hiro teleported to. All we know about Peter's future is that people with abilities are hunted. Maybe I'm reading too much into this and the show's writers don't delve that deeply in the story.

"My name is Sylar...and you are not my mother..."

"But I am, dear...I am..."

put like this, with the actual comas , i understand it now lol. Stupid english language. I kept thinking she was saying, But, I am dear.... I am... using dear as a sign of affection or kindness. so ooooooooooooo at that.

I was just doing some thinking about the future and have a theory that we have had two different futures. In one future, the one the season opened up with, we have people with abilities that are hunted down as a consequence of Nathan's press conference revelation. In the future that Hiro saw, it appeared that anyone could have had powers because we have seen 1) Mohinder create a serum to expose abilities and 2) Ando killing Hiro with his own power, which to me says that the future has changed drastically already and obviously revolves around the formula. The argument could be made that Mohinder probably would have done this anyhow (giving people powers), but it's feasible to think that Nathan revealing that he could fly could have resulted in Mohinder's research from not progressing to the point of giving people abilities. As it stands, we don't know that the future Peter came from is the same as the one Hiro teleported to. All we know about Peter's future is that people with abilities are hunted. Maybe I'm reading too much into this and the show's writers don't delve that deeply in the story.

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future. Which would be the 5th future we have seen. (Bomb future, no bomb future, virus future, Future Peter's future and Hiro's (season 3) future) All of which makes it very hard to keep track of. On second thought, maybe only 4 futures as not sure about the no bomb future being seperate.

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future. Which would be the 5th future we have seen. (Bomb future, no bomb future, virus future, Future Peter's future and Hiro's (season 3) future) All of which makes it very hard to keep track of. On second thought, maybe only 4 futures as not sure about the no bomb future being seperate.

Technically there are five futures, but instead of calling it a "no bomb future", it's better worded as the present (the present will go on, thus there will be a future of today where no catastrophic event has occurred), else you start having a no virus future, no mass people with abilities future, etc. I'm sure we will always see a new future because how else are they going to save the world?

in season 1 Sylar was originally "the bomb"... remember Future Hiro said he stabbed Sylar but he regenerated because he had Claire's power... once Claire was saved... Peter became the bomb... saving the cheerleader stopped Sylar from getting her power then.

Great point... looks like some people weren't really paying attention :p

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future.

Thank you, you saved me from having to type out a bunch of stuff. Basically, the future that Hiro went to and saw Ando hadoken his ass is a different future than the one future Peter is from. Peter coming back from future changed everything, hence that future Hiro saw is the consequence of what Peter had done.

As for the preview of Ma Petrelli giving that woman to Sylar to "study"... I am more inclined to believe she has some kind of persuasion power, otherwise, why would that girl stand there like a zombie and let him do what ever? (Unless they have some kind of serum that makes people comply) I hardly think the name 'Sylar' would be unknown to the people with powers.

It took me a while to explain to the girlfriend why I yelled "Fry him V. Weevil has your back." during the scene between Elle and Sylar.

LOL. Man, I was like WTF -- no effing way! If they killed Bell off the first episode, I would go apeshiit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
    • They said by this time everyone will have flying cars. WELL...
    • A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. Maybe not as we now know that time can flow backwards.
    • Of course. Simply reverse the polarity.
    • It is clear from this aricle that "Time Is On My Side" no matter which direction it is flowing., https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?i...m%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DsEj8lUx0gwY
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!