Heroes Volume 3 : Villains


Recommended Posts

I read the plot details and I was a little off because Peter's memory recovery needs clarification. He fully recovered his memory after meeting with Adam, but he did remember who his mom was (thus a partial recovery) in the future, before meeting Adam. So...... :unsure:

Edit: Basically waht SOOPRcow said :p

yea... seems the memory recovery with his mom was strictly to know that Angela was his mom and Nathan was his brother...

I was just doing some thinking about the future and have a theory that we have had two different futures. In one future, the one the season opened up with, we have people with abilities that are hunted down as a consequence of Nathan's press conference revelation. In the future that Hiro saw, it appeared that anyone could have had powers because we have seen 1) Mohinder create a serum to expose abilities and 2) Ando killing Hiro with his own power, which to me says that the future has changed drastically already and obviously revolves around the formula. The argument could be made that Mohinder probably would have done this anyhow (giving people powers), but it's feasible to think that Nathan revealing that he could fly could have resulted in Mohinder's research from not progressing to the point of giving people abilities. As it stands, we don't know that the future Peter came from is the same as the one Hiro teleported to. All we know about Peter's future is that people with abilities are hunted. Maybe I'm reading too much into this and the show's writers don't delve that deeply in the story.

"My name is Sylar...and you are not my mother..."

"But I am, dear...I am..."

put like this, with the actual comas , i understand it now lol. Stupid english language. I kept thinking she was saying, But, I am dear.... I am... using dear as a sign of affection or kindness. so ooooooooooooo at that.

I was just doing some thinking about the future and have a theory that we have had two different futures. In one future, the one the season opened up with, we have people with abilities that are hunted down as a consequence of Nathan's press conference revelation. In the future that Hiro saw, it appeared that anyone could have had powers because we have seen 1) Mohinder create a serum to expose abilities and 2) Ando killing Hiro with his own power, which to me says that the future has changed drastically already and obviously revolves around the formula. The argument could be made that Mohinder probably would have done this anyhow (giving people powers), but it's feasible to think that Nathan revealing that he could fly could have resulted in Mohinder's research from not progressing to the point of giving people abilities. As it stands, we don't know that the future Peter came from is the same as the one Hiro teleported to. All we know about Peter's future is that people with abilities are hunted. Maybe I'm reading too much into this and the show's writers don't delve that deeply in the story.

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future. Which would be the 5th future we have seen. (Bomb future, no bomb future, virus future, Future Peter's future and Hiro's (season 3) future) All of which makes it very hard to keep track of. On second thought, maybe only 4 futures as not sure about the no bomb future being seperate.

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future. Which would be the 5th future we have seen. (Bomb future, no bomb future, virus future, Future Peter's future and Hiro's (season 3) future) All of which makes it very hard to keep track of. On second thought, maybe only 4 futures as not sure about the no bomb future being seperate.

Technically there are five futures, but instead of calling it a "no bomb future", it's better worded as the present (the present will go on, thus there will be a future of today where no catastrophic event has occurred), else you start having a no virus future, no mass people with abilities future, etc. I'm sure we will always see a new future because how else are they going to save the world?

in season 1 Sylar was originally "the bomb"... remember Future Hiro said he stabbed Sylar but he regenerated because he had Claire's power... once Claire was saved... Peter became the bomb... saving the cheerleader stopped Sylar from getting her power then.

Great point... looks like some people weren't really paying attention :p

We strictly speaking from a time travel issue, Hiro would not be able to go to future Peter's future as it no longer existed the second he shot Nathan. So when Hiro went into the Future, it is a new future.

Thank you, you saved me from having to type out a bunch of stuff. Basically, the future that Hiro went to and saw Ando hadoken his ass is a different future than the one future Peter is from. Peter coming back from future changed everything, hence that future Hiro saw is the consequence of what Peter had done.

As for the preview of Ma Petrelli giving that woman to Sylar to "study"... I am more inclined to believe she has some kind of persuasion power, otherwise, why would that girl stand there like a zombie and let him do what ever? (Unless they have some kind of serum that makes people comply) I hardly think the name 'Sylar' would be unknown to the people with powers.

It took me a while to explain to the girlfriend why I yelled "Fry him V. Weevil has your back." during the scene between Elle and Sylar.

LOL. Man, I was like WTF -- no effing way! If they killed Bell off the first episode, I would go apeshiit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!