Company announces new gaming console


Recommended Posts

**sniff**sniff**...do I smell another M2-type outcome?...**sniff**sniff**

...in case you don't know your gaming history...the M2 was supposed to be this INCREDIBLY powerful system from Matsu$hita (either Pioneer or Panasonic's parents company). The rights and design for the hardware were eventually bought by another company. I forget who bought it, but I remember it was for a pretty steep amount tho. It was around $100 million if I am mistaken. The M2 concept design was pretty nice tho. I think the system was supposed to be the replacement for the 3DO consoles.

...oh and whoever created that concept design for the Phantom needs to take a long walk of a short bridge. It is FUGLY!!!

...and oh yea, the Xbox IS is basically a PC. There is nothing wrong with that tho... :shifty: :shifty: :shifty:

Edited by jago6498
I think this project will fail. Good idea, but like many others, no sense of business knowledge.

And look at the bulky size of the thing. Why does it need to be so fat?

The Indrema was on the right tracks, nice and slim line. Consoles don't need to occupy so much space like the xBox or Phantom.

Here's the Indrema

http://www.linuxdevices.com/files/misc/indrema.jpg

What console is that? I've never heard of it. SPILL THE BEANS!!!

Here is info I found on the M2:

Source link: Gameculture

M2.jpg

The nastiest offender of them all, the MARK II accelerator (M2) also came very close to actually being released. The M2 was reportedly developed alongside the original 3DO console in an attempt to create a long-lasting consumer platform that would be kept competitive with upgrades, much like the IBM PC. What began as an upgrade for the 3DO system eventually evolved into a full-fledged console that would have been several times more powerful than either the Sony Playstation or the Nintendo 64. The heart of the M2 was an IBM Power PC 64-bit processor, augmented by 10 graphics and sound co-processors.

The system was reportedly capable of processing a whopping 1 million polygons per second, three times faster than the PSX. Electronics giant Matsupoopa purchased the design for the M2 from 3DO for a reported 100 million dollars with the intention of taking the gaming world by force. Unfortunately, the Playstation's market dominance and Matsupoopa's fear of entering an already overcrowded playing field meant the doom of the M2.

Several promising games were ported over to other platforms, and other games were cancelled entirely (the 3-D fighter Iron & Blood went to the Playstation, and the horror adventure game D2 eventually appeared on the Dreamcast, albeit in a form that was vastly different from the one previewed for the M2.) Several functioning prototype M2 consoles have appeared on E-Bay, and at least one collector claims to have playable software.

You will able to play games on-line with PC games from this console

Now that is cool :yes:

(from the thread that Spyder closed)...that isn't anything new. Correct me if I am wrong, but people who originaly bought Quake III for the Dreamcast could play against Quake III Arena PC gamers. It's nothing revolutionary...

...the Phantom is gonna flop. I wonder if they are gonna be @ E3 2003 this year? They would be stupid not to go and at least TRY to promote some hype for the system.

Well they seem to be getting a lot of attention, looks like their homepage is getting too much traffic, can anyone else access the site?

You're not missing anything special ozric...its a POS website. They just boast that (even tho they are new to the gaming business) that they can beat the 3 juggernauts (Sony, Nintendo and M$.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • https://www.tenforums.com/tuto...b-results-windows-10-a.html Check the comment dates. Some of them are as old as 2016.
    • I wonder how many are laid off for cost savings, and this being blamed on AI to make it sound less scary and bad, for a more positive "modern, with the times" spin for investors? Because Oracle is down 14% the past year. We're looking at a company struggling here. If AI would actually be working out so well for them that they can do massive layoffs, surely this would've been reflected the past year in their stock value?
    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!