Vista SP1 Has NSA Backdoor?


Recommended Posts

Any thoughts about this?

A US cryptographer is warning that the random number generator Microsoft is bundling with SP1 includes a backdoor exploitable by the National Security Agency.

Random number generators are important because they provide the bedrock for SSL keys, which ensure secure internet communications for web browsing, email and instant messaging. Breaking the random number generator could leave user communications open to interception.

Security blogger Bruce Schneier believes this is precisely what will happen to the

"Dual_EC-DRBG" random number generator employed by Vista.

"There are a bunch of constants - fixed numbers - in the standard used to define the algorithm's elliptic curve," he says on his blog.

"These numbers have a relationship with a second, secret set of numbers that can act as a kind of skeleton key."

"To put that in real terms, you only need to monitor one TLS internet encryption connection in order to crack the security of that protocol. If you know the secret numbers, you can completely break any instantiation of Dual_EC_DRBG."

Schneier believes that this "secret" second set of numbers are held by the US's National Security Agency, one of the agencies which he claims championed Dual EC-DRBG as a cryptographic standard.

Microsoft hadn't replied to request for comment at the time of publication.

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/149133/vista-s...or-exploit.html

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/607936-vista-sp1-has-nsa-backdoor/
Share on other sites

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor exists it's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.

Plus, it's the NSA... I'm pretty sure they could find a way around our security

Unlikely - they wouldn't be trying to go all out on cracking down on businesses developing high end security products (such as extremely high end encryption) and threatening them to sneak in backdoors if they could just "crack it all".

It's also not that easy to operate in foreign countries, no matter what movies tell you.

Here's the original source. The followup articles are more speculative. BTW, its not that Microsoft is specifically complying or collaborating with the NSA. Its more that the US government is releasing this as one of four encryption standards...

http://www.wired.com/print/politics/securi...itymatters_1115

You can tighten a lock all you want, it will never make it 100% secure.

It's a bit like mathematics. You can divide '1' by '2' as much as you want, you will never reach '0', you will always end up with more and more decimals.

While I can't dismiss this as FUD, I can say it doesn't matter. If the NSA really wants to know what's on your computer, they'll either come in your house and look when you're not there or they'll seize it directly and examine it.

The NSA is an USA agency (or whatever) while Windows is distributed worldwide. Does it really still not matter?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor existsit's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.>
That's why backdoor are bullcrap stories.

Pip'

Also, why is this news? Its been like this for every major Windows release.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

What do you mean for especially not for non-us citizens... thats the whole point of the NSA :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!