Vista SP1 Has NSA Backdoor?


Recommended Posts

Any thoughts about this?

A US cryptographer is warning that the random number generator Microsoft is bundling with SP1 includes a backdoor exploitable by the National Security Agency.

Random number generators are important because they provide the bedrock for SSL keys, which ensure secure internet communications for web browsing, email and instant messaging. Breaking the random number generator could leave user communications open to interception.

Security blogger Bruce Schneier believes this is precisely what will happen to the

"Dual_EC-DRBG" random number generator employed by Vista.

"There are a bunch of constants - fixed numbers - in the standard used to define the algorithm's elliptic curve," he says on his blog.

"These numbers have a relationship with a second, secret set of numbers that can act as a kind of skeleton key."

"To put that in real terms, you only need to monitor one TLS internet encryption connection in order to crack the security of that protocol. If you know the secret numbers, you can completely break any instantiation of Dual_EC_DRBG."

Schneier believes that this "secret" second set of numbers are held by the US's National Security Agency, one of the agencies which he claims championed Dual EC-DRBG as a cryptographic standard.

Microsoft hadn't replied to request for comment at the time of publication.

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/149133/vista-s...or-exploit.html

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/607936-vista-sp1-has-nsa-backdoor/
Share on other sites

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor exists it's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.

Plus, it's the NSA... I'm pretty sure they could find a way around our security

Unlikely - they wouldn't be trying to go all out on cracking down on businesses developing high end security products (such as extremely high end encryption) and threatening them to sneak in backdoors if they could just "crack it all".

It's also not that easy to operate in foreign countries, no matter what movies tell you.

Here's the original source. The followup articles are more speculative. BTW, its not that Microsoft is specifically complying or collaborating with the NSA. Its more that the US government is releasing this as one of four encryption standards...

http://www.wired.com/print/politics/securi...itymatters_1115

You can tighten a lock all you want, it will never make it 100% secure.

It's a bit like mathematics. You can divide '1' by '2' as much as you want, you will never reach '0', you will always end up with more and more decimals.

While I can't dismiss this as FUD, I can say it doesn't matter. If the NSA really wants to know what's on your computer, they'll either come in your house and look when you're not there or they'll seize it directly and examine it.

The NSA is an USA agency (or whatever) while Windows is distributed worldwide. Does it really still not matter?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor existsit's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.>
That's why backdoor are bullcrap stories.

Pip'

Also, why is this news? Its been like this for every major Windows release.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

What do you mean for especially not for non-us citizens... thats the whole point of the NSA :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!