Vista SP1 Has NSA Backdoor?


Recommended Posts

Any thoughts about this?

A US cryptographer is warning that the random number generator Microsoft is bundling with SP1 includes a backdoor exploitable by the National Security Agency.

Random number generators are important because they provide the bedrock for SSL keys, which ensure secure internet communications for web browsing, email and instant messaging. Breaking the random number generator could leave user communications open to interception.

Security blogger Bruce Schneier believes this is precisely what will happen to the

"Dual_EC-DRBG" random number generator employed by Vista.

"There are a bunch of constants - fixed numbers - in the standard used to define the algorithm's elliptic curve," he says on his blog.

"These numbers have a relationship with a second, secret set of numbers that can act as a kind of skeleton key."

"To put that in real terms, you only need to monitor one TLS internet encryption connection in order to crack the security of that protocol. If you know the secret numbers, you can completely break any instantiation of Dual_EC_DRBG."

Schneier believes that this "secret" second set of numbers are held by the US's National Security Agency, one of the agencies which he claims championed Dual EC-DRBG as a cryptographic standard.

Microsoft hadn't replied to request for comment at the time of publication.

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/149133/vista-s...or-exploit.html

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/607936-vista-sp1-has-nsa-backdoor/
Share on other sites

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

I dont know much about cryptography or such, but...couldn't you null-and-void this problem by running a program on your system like peer guardian or something to block any connections to your machine from known ips such as the NSA?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor exists it's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.

Plus, it's the NSA... I'm pretty sure they could find a way around our security

Unlikely - they wouldn't be trying to go all out on cracking down on businesses developing high end security products (such as extremely high end encryption) and threatening them to sneak in backdoors if they could just "crack it all".

It's also not that easy to operate in foreign countries, no matter what movies tell you.

Here's the original source. The followup articles are more speculative. BTW, its not that Microsoft is specifically complying or collaborating with the NSA. Its more that the US government is releasing this as one of four encryption standards...

http://www.wired.com/print/politics/securi...itymatters_1115

You can tighten a lock all you want, it will never make it 100% secure.

It's a bit like mathematics. You can divide '1' by '2' as much as you want, you will never reach '0', you will always end up with more and more decimals.

While I can't dismiss this as FUD, I can say it doesn't matter. If the NSA really wants to know what's on your computer, they'll either come in your house and look when you're not there or they'll seize it directly and examine it.

The NSA is an USA agency (or whatever) while Windows is distributed worldwide. Does it really still not matter?

That's not really the point. ?Apart from the fact that if the NSA wants in your computer PeerGuardian wont save you, if a backdoor existsit's only a matter of time before someone with malicious intent cracks it.>
That's why backdoor are bullcrap stories.

Pip'

Also, why is this news? Its been like this for every major Windows release.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

Because the NSA should have no special ability to get into systems, especially for non-US citizens. If this is true then it's yet another case of the US thinking it is superior to the rest of the world. I have more faith in China having access to my personal information than I do the US, which only goes to show how poorly I rate the US government / government agencies.

What do you mean for especially not for non-us citizens... thats the whole point of the NSA :whistle:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!