iPhone 1.1.3 Spyshots


Recommended Posts

wish ipod touch had native google maps :(

Hopefully it will after the SDK is released in February (Y)

For what it's worth, Touch OS X makes for a better headline. It's easier to identify which version of OS X the topic is talking about. But technically speaking, yes it is called OS X.

When I saw "Touch OS X", I though it was about something tablet based. :laugh:

I know many people had been wanting the GPS functionality in Google Maps, so I'm sure they'll be happy!

...but it's not GPS as the iPhone doesn't have a GPS transponder in it. It's just tower triangulation and it doesn't work everywhere and it's not that accurate.

Google Maps for Windows Mobile does this now too.

I remember having to have the BlackJack II specifically for its GPS. After 3 weeks of using it I've come to the conclusion that nothing comes close to dedicated GPS systems...not to mention, I can never imagine myself being somewhere without have a general idea of where I am. So, I sold the BJII and got my iPhone 2 days ago.

Looking forward to 1.1.3 and SDK, though. Let's get the little irritating tidbits taken care of because even as of now, the iPhone is fantastic.

Next up on this rollercoaster ride of a rumour:

Gizmodo is now saying it is 100% real and will be out within a week. The dude says he is going to post more videos of other features in 1.1.3 and has set up a thread over at GearLive where you can ask him any questions you want.

http://www.gearlive.com/forums/viewthread/16402/

I don't really like the way iPhones get so many cool things. At the same price point of $399, an iPod touch only has 8 more gigabytes and is thinner. Otherwise, the iPhone has so many things... like Bluetooth, integrated camera, a bigger screen (with the same resolution though!), more built-in applications, etc.

Anyway, I would have bought the iPhone for sure, but here in Canada it costs like $700... 400 + customs + shipping + fake sim card + etc. etc. It makes no sense. And meanwhile, France, UK and USA are enjoying their iPhones.

I remember having to have the BlackJack II specifically for its GPS. After 3 weeks of using it I've come to the conclusion that nothing comes close to dedicated GPS systems...

My thoughts exactly. Integrating all my hand-held devices into one device (like iPhone) would be nice, but from the phone-GPS products out now, they're a half-hearted attempt at best. If I'm driving and I miss a turn, I'd want my GPS to respond immediately; not sit around, people honking behind me, waiting for it to recalculate.

And an oh yeah on the new 'page curl' effect. That'll get some "ooohs" at Macworld for sure.

GearLive now have now posted a video: http://cre.ations.net/blog/post/iphone-113...rangement-video

It looks real until you see the carrier icon which says "Nate" :/

Yes, I found that be a bit odd.

There are ways to change the carrier logo, so I wouldn't let that throw up a flag...

I'm thinking it's real...

The reason the carrier is Nate:

The SpringBoard (iPhone UI/icon screen) settings are stored in a file called com.apple.springboard.plist.

This is an Apple file that exists in all iPhones -- jailbroken or not.

An iPhone hacker/programmer (Erica Sadun) found undocumented preferences in this file. One of the preferences was to set a fake carrier. (http://www.tuaw.com/2007/11/27/a-half-dozen-fun-undocumented-iphone-preferences/)

When Nate upgraded, his com.apple.springboard.plist file was kept intact, as it is just his settings (I believe it has brightness, auto-lock time, etc).

If he restored, com.apple.springboard.plist was restored from the backup iTunes makes every time you sync your phone.

The fake carrier proves nothing, except that this is really Nate True's iPhone ;)

You have an ipod... an mp3 player... if you wanted a personal organizer with all the apps the iphone has... well... duh... get an iPhone.

I don't want another phone, and I don't want to sign with AT&T (not to mention I can't for another year or so even if I wanted to).

-Spenser

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!