Family dog kills one-year-old boy


Recommended Posts

A one-year-old boy has died after being attacked by a pet rottweiler at his grandparents' home, police have said.

Archie-Lee Andrew Hirst was snatched from his seven-year-old aunt's arms in the yard of the house in Chald Lane, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, on Friday.

He was taken to hospital with serious injuries but died later.

The dog was shot at the scene by a police marksman. It was destroyed to ensure the safety of others at the address, a police spokesman said.

The boy's family, including his teenage mother, are now receiving support from specially-trained officers, he said.

Det Supt Steve Payne, from West Yorkshire Police, said the boy was staying with his grandparents during the Christmas holidays.

He said: "What we know at this time is that the dog was a family pet, a two-and-a-half year old female rottweiler, which the family had owned for about six months.

"Although the dog lived in the yard of the premises, it had interacted with members of the family including children, and another dog and cat at the house, and had shown no previous signs of any aggression."

Mr Payne said the boy's aunt, aged 16, was caring for him and her two sisters, aged six and seven, in the house.

The 16-year-old girl was upstairs when the seven-year-old carried the baby outside to stroke the dog.

Mr Payne said: "Without any warning, the dog snatched the baby from the youngster's arms and carried him into the yard."

He said the 16-year-old tried to rescue the baby but was unable to do so, despite striking the dog several times.

Paramedics and police arrived within six minutes following an emergency call to police at 1530 GMT, he said.

The baby was taken to Pinderfields General Infirmary where he was pronounced dead.

The boy's parents were at a nearby property at the time.

A post-mortem examination has shown Archie-Lee died from multiple injuries consistent with a dog attack.

The death follows the unlawful killing of five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson who was killed by her uncle's dog in St Helen's on New Year's Day 2007.

The illegal pit bull terrier called Reuben attacked Ellie at the home of her grandmother, Jackie Simpson, who was later found not guilty of manslaughter through gross negligence.

Ellie's uncle Kiel Simpson, 24, was jailed for eight weeks at Liverpool Magistrates' Court in May after admitting owning a dog banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.

Chris Window, from the Rottweiler Club, said it was very uncommon for attacks of this nature to take place.

But he said young children should never be left alone with any large breed of dog.

"All breeds of dogs are animals. They do revert to animal instincts. If a dog is confronted with a situation they are not used to, they can react unexpectedly."

WHAT HAPPENED

Archie-Lee is at grandparents' Wakefield home

Aunt, 16, is looking after him and two sisters, six and seven

Seven-year-old takes Archie to kitchen to stroke the dog

Dog snatches Archie, takes him into yard and attacks him

The seven-year-old goes upstairs to tell the 16-year-old

The 16-year-old strikes the dog several times but cannot separate it from Archie

1530 GMT: Aunt phones 999

1536 GMT: Paramedics arrive

1539 GMT: Armed police arrive

Dog shot by police marksman

Archie-Lee dies in hospital

[Source]

Edited by Lt-DavidW
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/609984-family-dog-kills-one-year-old-boy/
Share on other sites

Rottweilers aren't illegal as I know quite a few people that own them. It's American Pit Bulls that are banned in the UK.

Is there some other dog that looks exactly like them then that is legal? When I get the bus to uni and it goes through a fairly rough area, there are dogs that look exactly like pit bull's on practically every corner.

Rottweilers aren't illegal as I know quite a few people that own them. It's American Pit Bulls that are banned in the UK.

There are Staffordshire Bull Terriers from England, and then their two american cousin breeds, the American Staffordshire Terrier and the American Pit Bull Terrier. The American Staffordshire (Amstaff) Terrier is nothing more than a sub-category of Pit Bull in which breeders select certain characteristics they find appealing. The breeds get an unfair reputation and most raised by any responsible owner are safe pets. The breed also has a reputation for being exceptionally well adjusted to playing with children, many people often mistake "well adjusted for children" to mean infant safe, bad adult supervision and poor socialization between the dog and baby is the fault of the owner if an attack occurs.

An infant or small child should never be anywhere rear a large dog, even if supervised by adults. Period.

I agree, I have a 8 months daughter and a Labrador mixed with pit-bull and I never let the dog touch her, I always take her in my arms when the dog is present, keeping always the distance. The dog is very friendly but that's not enough with infants, they are animals and you never know when they going to act weird.

Why not, that's just rediculous.

Because when it all comes down to it, these are predatory animals. How many times have you seen this story? The family dog suddenly kills the baby or child. No history of violence or any other previous indication that it would do such a thing. It's just irresposible to have a large dog around a baby.

Personally I don't like dogs, but you'd better believe if I had one and had kids over, it would be locked up in the yard for the duration of the kids stay with the kids not being allowed anywhere near it. No matter how "sweet" it seems to be.

I agree, I have a 8 months daughter and a Labrador mixed with pit-bull and I never let the dog touch her, I always take her in my arms when the dog is present, keeping always the distance. The dog is very friendly but that's not enough with infants, they are animals and you never know when they going to act weird.

Personally I'd say get rid of the dog. It's not worth risking your daughter for. All it takes is one lapse in judgement or not paying close enough attention, and it's all over. Best case scenario is your daughter is scarred for life. Like you said, you never know what an animal could suddenly do.

Because when it all comes down to it, these are predatory animals. How many times have you seen this story? The family dog suddenly kills the baby or child. No history of violence or any other previous indication that it would do such a thing. It's just irresposible to have a large dog around a baby.

Personally I don't like dogs, but you'd better believe if I had one and had kids over, it would be locked up in the yard for the duration of the kids stay with the kids not being allowed anywhere near it. No matter how "sweet" it seems to be.

Personally I'd say get rid of the dog. It's not worth risking your daughter for. All it takes is one lapse in judgement or not paying close enough attention, and it's all over. Best case scenario is your daughter is scarred for life. Like you said, you never know what an animal could suddenly do.

That's the most rediculous thing I've ever heard of. You don't like dogs, therefore, you don't think children should be around them. I'm glad I don't know anybody like that. Also, I haven't heard of the family dog killing the children very much. Every once in a while I hear about some random dog mauled somebody who was walking by or whatever, but not the family dog hurting somebody in the family.

I have three small children and had a Saint Bernard and he was very gentle with the kids. They would climb all over him and he would do nothing, he wouldn't even aggressively play with them. He used to lay in the bottom of my son's exersaucer while he was sitting in it, he loved the kids.

One of the lasses I work with has 2 staffies, and she treats them like kids. They sleep in bed with her, her b/f sometimes has to sleep in the other bed. She is now pregnant. I wonder what her dogs will be like when she has the kid. They could get envious of the attention the kid will get.

The one in the news is only about a mile from my house.

That's the most rediculous thing I've ever heard of. You don't like dogs, therefore, you don't think children should be around them. I'm glad I don't know anybody like that. Also, I haven't heard of the family dog killing the children very much. Every once in a while I hear about some random dog mauled somebody who was walking by or whatever, but not the family dog hurting somebody in the family.

You are probably a pretty responsible person though, these cases are always to do with the owner leaving it unattended etc. As much as owners might 'know' their dog, you can't ignore the fact that they are animals and are not 100% predictable, especially when it's a breed that is only around for the purpose of fighting and in my opinion they shouldn't be around. If a random dog mauls a person walking by, or a family dog hurting someone in the family, it doesn't really change the argument.

That's the most rediculous thing I've ever heard of. You don't like dogs, therefore, you don't think children should be around them. I'm glad I don't know anybody like that. Also, I haven't heard of the family dog killing the children very much. Every once in a while I hear about some random dog mauled somebody who was walking by or whatever, but not the family dog hurting somebody in the family.

I have three small children and had a Saint Bernard and he was very gentle with the kids. They would climb all over him and he would do nothing, he wouldn't even aggressively play with them. He used to lay in the bottom of my son's exersaucer while he was sitting in it, he loved the kids.

It has nothing to do with the fact that I don't like dogs. It's about keeping your kids safe. As far as you not hearing of the family dog killing kids, I don't know what news you watch, but it happens all the time.

For the record my mom has a big Rottweiler. I like the dog a lot, even though I don't like dogs in general. It's a really sweet, gentle dog. She still locks her outside on the deck when my brother's 3 small children go over to visit though, and they aren't allowed near the dog. It's just the prudent thing to do. You never know what a big dog like that will do.

It has nothing to do with the fact that I don't like dogs. It's about keeping your kids safe. As far as you not hearing of the family dog killing kids, I don't know what news you watch, but it happens all the time.

For the record my mom has a big Rottweiler. I like the dog a lot, even though I don't like dogs in general. It's a really sweet, gentle dog. She still locks her outside on the deck when my brother's 3 small children go over to visit though, and they aren't allowed near the dog. It's just the prudent thing to do. You never know what a big dog like that will do.

The only thing that I'd be worried about with a big dog around little kids would be the dog getting excited and running the child over. Other than that, as long as I'm around I'm not worried at all. Now obviously, if it was a dog I didn't know I would be more cautious, but not with a family pet.

It has nothing to do with the fact that I don't like dogs. It's about keeping your kids safe. As far as you not hearing of the family dog killing kids, I don't know what news you watch, but it happens all the time.

So with that in mind, let's start isolating children from each other - after all if you look at the statistics they are more likely to harm or kill each other than a pet dog.

For the record my mom has a big Rottweiler

For the record I've been raised up since day 1 with more or less large dogs and never in my life has one of them bit me, threatened me in any way - on the contrary every dog I've had or I've been around has always been the epitome of kindness towards either me when I was a child or those around me. Heck, I used to pull their tail, ears, spanked them and done all sorts of stupid childlike stuff and none of them responded with aggressiveness.

"He said: "What we know at this time is that the dog was a family pet, a two-and-a-half year old female rottweiler, which the family had owned for about six months."

They only had the dog for about six months so they did not know what kind of training or experiences around small children this particular dog had for the 2 years previous to coming to live with this family. For all they know the dog could had been previously abused or teased by small children and reacted accordingly to what he perceived as a threat. When I was little we had a female Rottweiler named Venus and she was raised by us since she was a month old and NEVER tried anything aggressive against any member of the family even though there were 5 of us and sometimes we played very rough with her. Dogs aren't born bad it is people who turn them bad either by mistreating them or teaching them the wrong stuff. I'm not saying this was the case but maybe it was. :no:

Bio

What it comes down to is the owner. If he/she cannot handle this type of dog, then they should give it. I don't believe in banning any type of dog is right because it hurts real owners, which can handle that type of dog. I have a friend who breeds Rottweiler for a living. He has four kids, youngest is three years old, and nothing has ever gone wrong.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!