• 0

[C#] Dynamic Event Handling


Question

I have an arbitrary list of elements that I'm adding to a tableLayoutPanel (it was the first layout I came across that I could add elements to and it would be scrollable). For each element, I add the name of the element, with a TrackBar and a TextBox. (so three controls per row).

I want to link the TrackBar with the TextBox in a way where when I move the TrackBar, it changes the numeric value in the textBox to the value of the TrackBar (and ViceVersa).

I know how to add the Events for the two (+= new EventHandler(Scrolled)). The problem is all my elements are being added with the same EventName, so no matter which control I manipulate, i want the corresponding controls to change as well... I think this is OK, because I don't know how many of these elements I will have until runtime.

My question is this... inside the Scrolled method, how can I make elementScrollBar1 change elementTextBox1, and 2 -> 2, 3 -> 3, etc? The only things passed in are object sender, EventArgs events. Is what I'm trying to do possible? If so please help.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/610910-c-dynamic-event-handling/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You need something like this:

		private void AddControls_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
		{
			TextBox textbox = new TextBox();
			TrackBar trackbar = new TrackBar();
			trackbar.Maximum = 10;
			trackbar.Tag = textbox;

			trackbar.Scroll +=  delegate(object sender2, EventArgs e2)
								{
									TrackBar currentTrackBar = sender2 as TrackBar;
									TextBox currentTextBox = currentTrackBar.Tag as TextBox;
									currentTextBox.Text = currentTrackBar.Value.ToString();
								};
			tableLayoutPanel1.Controls.AddRange(new Control[] { textbox, trackbar });

		}

Add that into a button click event.

Hope this helps.

  • 0

My controls are added dynamically when the program is run, not by a click event... I'm guessing replacing my code with this for those two controls will have the same effect? Looking at this it seems like I should do this for other trackbar/textbox combos I have... this links the two I'm guessing?

Does this also allow someone to edit the textbox and it affect the trackbar?

  • 0

I figured out that it doesn't and modified my code to make it work.. I did something similar to what you showed, using the textBox.Tag = trackBar to put a reference.

Is this common practice? If I want to relate two controls, should I just reference each within the Tag variable? Is that common practice? It seems a little odd to me, even though it works as a hack.

  • 0

Why don't you create a custom control that includes the elements you need, and put the logic there? That's probably the most common practice in this case, since it's exactly why custom controls exist...

Just add a new UserControl to your project, name it something useful, and add a TextBox and Trackbar to it with the layout you want. Then set up the event handlers as you normally would inside the control, you can even use the Forms Designer for all of this.

Then in your main app, instead of dynamically generating TextBoxes and Trackbars, you add MyCustomControls that encapsulate the functionality you need. If you need to you can then expose a method or property on your custom control like GetValue() that returns the value (as indicated by both the textbox and trackbar).

  • 0

I didn't know about this custom control stuff, this seems to be much easier to work with... but I have a new problem because of it

So I have a control with a bunch of controls, one of them again linking a trackbar to a textBox... when I manipulate the trackBar, it updates the textBox correctly.. I have all the event stuff inside the Control Class... but the problem is, whenever I change the trackBar I want to call my update() method from the main class (Form1)... How would one do this?

Edited by zackiv31
  • 0
  zackiv31 said:
I didn't know about this custom control stuff, this seems to be much easier to work with... but I have a new problem because of it

So I have a control with a bunch of controls, one of them again linking a trackbar to a textBox... when I manipulate the trackBar, it updates the textBox correctly.. I have all the event stuff inside the Control Class... but the problem is, whenever I change the trackBar I want to call my update() method from the main class (Form1)... How would one do this?

Ideally, your control would expose an event that would notify any listeners that the trackbar has changed.

  • 0

You would create a delegate and an event that are public in your user control, and when you handle the trackbar change event in your user control, you fire another event indicating that it changed to the 'outside' world.

using System;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Windows.Forms;

namespace cs3
{
	public delegate void ValueChangedHandler(object sender, int newValue);

	public partial class UserControl1 : UserControl
	{
		public UserControl1()
		{
			InitializeComponent();
			textBox1.Text = trackBar1.Value.ToString();
		}

		[Category("Action")]
		public event ValueChangedHandler ValueChanged;

		private void trackBar1_ValueChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
		{
			textBox1.Text = trackBar1.Value.ToString();
			OnValueChanged(trackBar1.Value);
		}

		protected void OnValueChanged(int newValue)
		{
			if (ValueChanged != null)
				ValueChanged(this, newValue);
		}
	}
}

  • 0
  zackiv31 said:
		[Category("Action")]
		  public event ValueChangedHandler ValueChanged;

This is new to me.. but seems interesting... what exactly are the [] for? What does it represent or tell he compiler?

It's an attribute for the designer. Add the control to your form, and then select the control. In the Properties pane of the designer, you see properties categorized. If you click on the Events button(the lightning bolt), it lists the events that your control exposes. If you didn't put the CategoryAttribute above your event, it would show up at the bottom of the list in the Misc category.

Attributes are one of the cool aspects of .NET that can be leveraged in many interesting ways. You could effectively describe your class with attributes and discover the metadata at runtime, and perform actions based on it. I've built a framework that utilized attributes to describe how properties should be validated. It was only a proof of concept, but it worked quite well. I'm now seeing that same idea show up in other frameworks, such as the Castle Project's MVC framework.

Edited by azcodemonkey
  • 0

here's my userControl:

	public delegate void ValueChangedHandler(object sender);

	public partial class ListBag : UserControl
	{
		[Category("Action")]
		public event ValueChangedHandler ValueChanged;

here's the declaration in Form1:

ListBag lb = new ListBag();
					lb.ValueChanged += new ValueChangedHandler;

It doesn't recognize this, it tries to make it " += ValueChangedHandler(someNameHere)"...

  • 0

But you said you wanted your Form1 to know when something changed inside the user control. That's why you need to have a method inside Form1 that gets called when the event is fired. It can be named anything you want (like OnListBagValueChanged or something).

  • 0
  zackiv31 said:
wo wo wo... OnValueChanged is a part of my custom UserControl... therefore Form1 has no idea abou the inner workings of it...

someone confirm this? (and help still)

Your form needs to have a method that matches the signature of the delegate of your control.

protected void UserCtrlValueChanged(object sender)
{
	...
}

Then you can use the += syntax to add a new handler in your form's InitializeComponent method.

userCtrlInstance.ValueChanged += new ValueChangedHandler(UserCtrlValueChanged);

You should be able to do this completely through the designer. Add the control to your form, select the control, go to the Properties panel in the IDE and select the Event(lightning bolt), and double-click the ValueChanged event in the UI. This will do all of the above correctly for you.

Edit: Brandon got it. :)

  • 0

Not that it matters much, but if that's what you delegate looks like - you don't actually need a custom one. Just use the built-in EventHandler delegate. Other than that little nit, it looks like you've got things figured out.

  • 0

Well it depends. Are you using:

public delegate void ValueChangedHandler(object sender);

or

public delegate void ValueChangedHandler(object sender, int newValue);

If the latter, then just keep it as is. If the former, then you don't need to declare that delegate at all.

protected void UserCtrlValueChanged(object sender)
{
...
}

in your main form, becomes

protected void UserCtrlValueChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
...
}

And everywhere you used "ValueChangedHandler" before, you could now use just the built-in EventHandler delegate.

For example:

userCtrlInstance.ValueChanged += new ValueChangedHandler(UserCtrlValueChanged);

becomes

userCtrlInstance.ValueChanged += new EventHandler(UserCtrlValueChanged);

But if you are using a custom delegate to pass an integer with the new value, then you'll want to keep doing it the way you are. And when the event is raised, you just pass EventArgs.Empty for the second parameter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon lays off more staff across Goodreads and Kindle divisions by Hamid Ganji Dozens of Amazon employees working on the retailer's book divisions have been laid off. As reported by Reuters, Amazon confirmed that it's cutting jobs across the Goodreads review site and Kindle units, which impacts fewer than 100 workers. Amazon says the recent layoffs across Goodreads and Kindle divisions are meant to improve efficiency and streamline operations. The giant retailer has constantly reduced staff across various divisions over the past few years. According to CEO Andy Jassy, reducing headcounts helps the company to eliminate bureaucracy. "As part of our ongoing work to make our teams and programs operate more efficiently and to better align with our business roadmap, we've made the difficult decision to eliminate a small number of roles within the Books organization," an Amazon spokesperson said. Layoffs recently impacted employees in Amazon's Wondery podcast division, devices and services units, communications, and in-store staff. However, Amazon's Q1 results show the retailer has added about 4,000 jobs compared to Q4 2024. After the Covid pandemic settled down, many companies began laying off thousands of staff they hired during the pandemic to respond to growing demands. The layoff trend among tech firms still exists today, and AI has amplified it. The latest data shows that in 2025, about 62,832 tech employees were laid off across 141 tech companies. Also, 152,922 tech employees across 551 companies were laid off in 2024. More layoffs are expected to occur due to declining economic growth, tariffs, and the expansion of AI across companies. Amazon is also gearing up to double down in AI investments and robotics. The company has recently announced the forming of a new agentic AI team to develop an agentic AI framework for use in robotics. Also, a new report by The Information indicates that Amazon has begun testing humanoid robots for package delivery.
    • Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta by Razvan Serea MajorPrivacy is a cutting-edge privacy and security tool for Windows, offering unparalleled control over process behavior, file access, and network communication. It is a continuation of the PrivateWin10 project. By leveraging advanced kernel-level protections, MajorPrivacy creates a secure environment where user data and system integrity are fully safeguarded. Unlike traditional tools, MajorPrivacy introduces innovative protection methods that ensure mounted encrypted volumes are only accessible by authorized applications, making it the first and only encryption solution of its kind. MajorPrivacy – Ultimate Privacy & Security for Windows key features Process Protection – Isolate processes to block interference from unauthorized apps, even with admin privileges. Software Restriction – Block unwanted apps and DLLs to ensure only trusted software runs. Revolutionary Encrypted Volumes Secure Storage – Create encrypted disk images for sensitive data. Exclusive Access – Unlike traditional tools, only authorized apps can access mounted volumes—blocking all unauthorized processes. File & Folder Protection – Lock down sensitive files and prevent unauthorized access or modifications. Advanced Network Firewall – Control which apps can send or receive data online. DNS Monitoring & Filtering – Track domain access and block unwanted sites (Pi-hole compatible filtering coming soon). Tweak Engine – Disable telemetry, cloud integration, and invasive Windows features for better privacy. Why MajorPrivacy? Kernel-Level Security – Protects at the deepest system level. Unmatched Encryption Protection – Keeps mounted volumes safe from all unauthorized access. Full System Control – Block, isolate, or restrict processes as needed. Enhanced Privacy – Stops Windows & apps from collecting unnecessary data. Perfect for privacy-conscious users, IT pros, and anyone who wants total system control. Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta changelog: The 0.98.1 release of MajorPrivacy introduces significant enhancements and a number of critical fixes aimed at improving usability, localization, and system integration. A major new feature is the introduction of full translation support, allowing the application interface and tweaks to be localized into multiple languages. Initial translations include AI-assisted German and Polish versions, a community-contributed Turkish translation, and Simplified Chinese. Users interested in contributing translations or adding new languages are encouraged to participate via the forum. This version also improves compatibility and deployment by bundling the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable with the installer, which is required for the ImDisk user interface. Several important bugs have been resolved. The installer now correctly removes the driver during uninstallation. Tweak definitions have been cleaned up for better consistency. A number of networking issues were addressed, including failures related to network shares and incorrect handling of mapped drive letters. It is now required to use full UNC paths for defining rules involving shared resources. Additionally, configuration persistence issues on system shutdown have been fixed, as well as problems affecting protected folder visibility and rule precedence involving enclave conditions. Finally, the underlying driver code has been refactored, laying the groundwork for better maintainability and future enhancements. MajorPrivacy-v0.98.1.1.exe (0.98.1a) hotfix for #71 Download: Major Privacy 0.98.1.1 Beta | 47.4 MB (Open Source) View: MajorPrivacy Home Page | Github Project page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OpenAI responds to The New York Times' ChatGPT data demands by Pradeep Viswanathan The New York Times has sued OpenAI for the unauthorized use of its news articles to train large language models. As part of the ongoing lawsuit, the NYT recently asked the court to require OpenAI to retain all ChatGPT user content indefinitely. The NYT's argument is that they may find something in the data that supports their case. Brad Lightcap, COO of OpenAI, wrote the following regarding the NYT's sweeping demand: OpenAI has already filed a motion asking the Magistrate Judge to reconsider the preservation order, since indefinite retention of user data breaches industry norms and its own policies. Additionally, OpenAI has also appealed this order with the District Court Judge. Until OpenAI wins its appeal, it will be complying with the court order. The content defined by the court order will be stored separately in a secure system and will be accessed or used only for meeting legal obligations. Only a small, audited OpenAI legal and security team will be able to access this data as necessary to comply with our legal obligations. As of early 2025, ChatGPT has over 400 million weekly active users, and this data retention order will affect a significant number of them. OpenAI confirmed that ChatGPT Free, Plus, Pro, and Teams subscription users, and developers who use the OpenAI API (without a Zero Data Retention agreement) will be affected by this order. ChatGPT Enterprise, ChatGPT Edu, and API customers who are using Zero Data Retention endpoints will not be affected by this court change.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      jfam earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      survivor303 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      428
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      239
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      211
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      211
    5. 5
      Xenon
      157
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!