Seagate CEO: Blu-ray won the battle but lost the war


Recommended Posts

Hard drives are still not as reliable as optical media. It would suck to download 20 HD movies onto your hard drive from online retailers to have that hard drive go bad and have to download all that again.

Where? From what I can tell this is you completely changing directions since HD DVD is on the way out.

For every "internet distribution = good point" you made you've made 1000 HD DVD is t3h b3s7 evar posts.

Look for it. I've always said that optical media and GIGABYTES for the advantage of Blu-Ray in space is completely irrelevant as we will see new effective storage media like hard drives and other USB devices, that are much faster, rewritable and hold A LOT more storage while costing less.

Optical media only had purpose with movies, but that it would eventually be replaced by digital distribution.

Of course, people that support Blu-ray simply have no desire to look things that are relevant to the overall picture of things. You only see things that echo positive perspective for Blu-Ray.

I understand that, but quit telling me what is possible and start telling me whether or not consumers want it.

And why do you think they won't want it?

Here, take a look at Netflix vs Blockbuster. Netflix soared past Blockbuster with online service despite the fact that Blockbuster had a store in every neighborhood.

People were and still are to wait a day or TWO to get the movie, just so they don't have to get out of the couch and they get to watch unlimited movies for a fixed price.

With Netflix on-demand online movies, the situation is aready getting there for renting.

People will eat this up, only so far we really didn't have the infrastructure to do it so we can watch HD content.

If you notice, iTunes and their shows is making HUGE amounts of money and they continue increasing the quality of movies and shows you download. It was so successful it warranted Apple creating an Apple TV device for it. The device is being sold like hotcakes too at $300+ a pop.

Tell me, why do you think that XStreamHD technology at $399 that allows you unlimited HD movies you can buy, rent 24 hours a day at any moment? Imagine this, 4x 2TB Seagate harddrives in drive bays of the XStreamHD media center where you store all your movies you downloaded. The best part, when they are digital, you can actually back them up to another HDD and make sure that you have a safe copy. With Blu-Ray for example, if the disc gets damaged, you have to go and buy another copy of it. It is true that if your hard drive goes, everything goes so you tend to lose more, but if they offer downloads tracking like many stock photo or even itunes offer, you can redownload the movies you bought the license for again from the service. All in all, much more flexibility for the consumer.

Add to this the ability to watch the movies you downloaded on any device in your house like PS3, HD DVD player, computer, PSP etc makes it even more appealing.

Yeah, if these guys come out with affordable monthly fees and get the recievers at <$300 over time, they'll replace these pay-per-view services.

Look for it. I've always said that optical media and GIGABYTES for the advantage of Blu-Ray in space is completely irrelevant as we will see new effective storage media like hard drives and other USB devices, that are much faster, rewritable and hold A LOT more storage while costing less.

Optical media only had purpose with movies, but that it would eventually be replaced by digital distribution.

Of course, people that support Blu-ray simply have no desire to look things that are relevant to the overall picture of things. You only see things that echo positive perspective for Blu-Ray.

I bet that if HDDVD was the one on top, you wouldn't be saying those comments.

Where? From what I can tell this is you completely changing directions since HD DVD is on the way out.

For every "internet distribution = good point" you made you've made 1000 HD DVD is t3h b3s7 evar posts.

+1

Never heard of xstreamhd before Warner went Blu :rolleyes:

And why do you think they won't want it?

Here, take a look at Netflix vs Blockbuster. Netflix soared past Blockbuster with online service despite the fact that Blockbuster had a store in every neighborhood.

People were and still are to wait a day or TWO to get the movie, just so they don't have to get out of the couch and they get to watch unlimited movies for a fixed price.

With Netflix on-demand online movies, the situation is aready getting there for renting.

People will eat this up, only so far we really didn't have the infrastructure to do it so we can watch HD content.

If you notice, iTunes and their shows is making HUGE amounts of money and they continue increasing the quality of movies and shows you download. It was so successful it warranted Apple creating an Apple TV device for it. The device is being sold like hotcakes too at $300+ a pop.

Tell me, why do you think that XStreamHD technology at $399 that allows you unlimited HD movies you can buy, rent 24 hours a day at any moment? Imagine this Seagate harddrives in drive bays of the XStreamHD media center where you store all your movies you downloaded.

Add to this the ability to watch the movies you downloaded on any device in your house like PS3, HD DVD player, computer, PSP etc makes it even more appealing.

Yeah, if these guys come out with affordable monthly fees and get the recievers at <$300 over time, they'll replace these pay-per-view services.

How many people have used this whole "on-demand" stuff? Why are satellite companies not making an absolute killing on pay-per-view movies compared to rental stores and services like Netflix and Blockbuster? Consumers have already spoken with their actions. They don't want these kind of services because they're not buying them.

Don't confuse Netflix's mail service with this. It's not even remotely the same.

XStreamHD has a neat idea, but I don't think people will buy it. How about all the customers that don't have broadband internet -- what are they supposed to use? What about people who have download limits imposed by their ISPs -- what are they supposed to do? How about people that want a physical indication that they own something -- what are they supposed to do? How about people who don't want to spend $400 on an appliance to download and play movies when they can spend less on an appliance that plays movies -- what are they supposed to do?

+1

Never heard of xstreamhd before Warner went Blu :rolleyes:

As much as I vehemently disagree with Boz's stance, he has been saying downloads are the future for a while now. You two need to stop trying to incite problems.

XStreamHD has a neat idea, but I don't think people will buy it. How about all the customers that don't have broadband internet -- what are they supposed to use? What about people who have download limits imposed by their ISPs -- what are they supposed to do? How about people that want a physical indication that they own something -- what are they supposed to do? How about people who don't want to spend $400 on an appliance to download and play movies when they can spend less on an appliance that plays movies -- what are they supposed to do?

they are supposed to buy Blu-Ray. :p

As much as I vehemently disagree with Boz's stance, he has been saying downloads are the future for a while now. You two need to stop trying to incite problems.

Do you think he would have mentioned xstreamhd if Warner had gone hd dvd? I doubt it.

But I guess he will tell me otherwise :laugh:

Do you think he would have mentioned xstreamhd if Warner had gone hd dvd? I doubt it.

But I guess he will tell me otherwise :laugh:

I do. But you're obviously to blind with joy in the fact that you can rub the Warner Blu-Ray situation in his face for a while before it gets old (or gets you warned) to comprehend that.

stevan: That's my point. :)

How many people have used this whole "on-demand" stuff? Why are satellite companies not making an absolute killing on pay-per-view movies compared to rental stores and services like Netflix and Blockbuster? Consumers have already spoken with their actions. They don't want these kind of services because they're not buying them.

Don't confuse Netflix's mail service with this. It's not even remotely the same.

XStreamHD has a neat idea, but I don't think people will buy it. How about all the customers that don't have broadband internet -- what are they supposed to use? What about people who have download limits imposed by their ISPs -- what are they supposed to do? How about people that want a physical indication that they own something -- what are they supposed to do? How about people who don't want to spend $400 on an appliance to download and play movies when they can spend less on an appliance that plays movies -- what are they supposed to do?

On Demand stuff is not the same as what we are talking about here. Btw, Pay-Per-View is doing just fine it's mass adopted everywhere. People do pay them, but it's the limited choices of movies and high price per movie that has somewhat a limiting factor. Their infrastructure didn't allow proper support to consumers.

And you are right, I was never a big fan of pay-per-view as I don't actually own the movie. I'd like something like iTunes that will offer me to buy and create a digital libarary of movies in my home as opposed to paying $5-$6-$10 per movies every time I want to watch it. This business model is what has kept digital distribution from igniting.

Netflix service is the same as this in a way because you are using alternate means of getting movies. You don't own them, you have your account online and your order movies online. The only thing is that you get them to your house via mail.

Now replace this type of service with digital one. Where there's no need to wait at all. You do the same thing and start watching the movie right away. This is the reason why Netflix is opening their own ONLINE viewing module.

The problem with this though is that it will work only for SD for now if they rely on cable connection. At least not until next year when we can expect to have 40-50mbps connections as standard. In the meantime, satellite/XSteamHD type of service relies on satellite. The best idea that combines the effectiveness of Netflix approach with the ability to actually own movies as you can download them, but with no bandwith restrictions.

Again, for xStreamHD you don't need internet. It's satellite. Satellite dish and setting up is cheap today and millions and millions of people already has the infrastructure for it, courtesty of DirectTV.

Honestly, this is no different then Blu-Ray players now. If one defends that it's ok to pay $300-$400 for Blu-Ray player, I can't say that xStreamHD for $399 will be a horrible thing. Of course, it will start with early adopters first, but the beauty of mass adoption is that as more people sign up, they'll make it more appealing. There's no doubt, just like any Blu-Ray player or HD DVD player would drop in price. Don't forget, for companies like XstreamHD the main source of revenue will be monthly subscription, not the device itself.

And XStreamHD in question here, offers 3 models, you can BUY and OWN the movie (in digital form of course) and watch it ANYWHERE, renting it and I believe that you'll even have movies in theaters available through their system.

I think that in Q4 2008, I'll be getting one without a doubt. They will probably face slower adoption with studios, but it will come when they give them good money possibilities. Don't forget all these studios are horny about digital too as it allows them multiple sales of the same item for overall higher price. There's a reason why iTunes is no. 1 service.

The only reason Universal walked from them is because they wouldn't raise the price on some movies. If they did, they wouldn't have problems. But in essence it shows how much everyone likes digital. Just look at Xbox Live too.

This model is the future and is closer then we all thought.

Yes we'll all be downloading our movies eventually, but that's not in this war. By the time downloading movies becomes feasible for the majority, Blu-Ray will already have many years as the top format for buying movies in.

Common you guys, direct Tv has HD on demand movies and events that download off the internet while watching satellite Tv, gets recorded on direct Tv HD DVRS, all direct tv customers can do that. All the new direct dvr receivers since last year have an internet connection, and you can also play music and photos from your networked computers. I have my dvr full of stuff for my children, and PPV events and PPv movies that I missed.

I can record all of that to dvdrw if I want to.

I do. But you're obviously to blind with joy in the fact that you can rub the Warner Blu-Ray situation in his face for a while before it gets old (or gets you warned) to comprehend that.

stevan: That's my point. :)

I dont.

I am not rubbing anything in anyones face. My opinion is that this xtreamhd talk would have never started if things were looking good for HD DVD (as in Warner going exclusive with them).

Getting warned for speaking my mind? :laugh:

I dont.

I am not rubbing anything in anyones face. My opinion is that this xtreamhd talk would have never started if things were looking good for HD DVD (as in Warner going exclusive with them).

Getting warned for speaking my mind? :laugh:

Given that he's stated he expects online services to do well in the past, I disagree completely. Also because XStreamHD had a big presence at CES (at least in the technology community), I disagree again.

And, no, I don't think anyone should get warned for speaking their mind. I think the people who are flame baiting Boz should be warned.

@ Boz: Well, we'll just have to agree to disagree and see which format is widely adopted in the future... although it may be a few years.

And why do you think they won't want it?

Simple. Costs.

Companies can announce outrageous speed offerings for upload and downloading, but overall I have yet to see a "decent" price point for high speed. In my neck of the woods 25 dollars covers 1.5mb download and 340k upload. There is no way in hell that this download offerings are going to take off when the customer is already crippled with the packages being offered.

If the pricing scheme changes, then I don't for see a problem. According to the teleco folks I've been talking about, the infrastructure in the US is there, however the licensing and other political kinks would still need to be worked on.

HD Streaming is coming... that's a given. Nobody should even question that. We've already seen it through SD On Demand. But it's not now... and it's not even ready for the wide scale yet. The current high definition leader is now clearly Blu-ray and will continue to be until the XStream (or whatever comes out on top) is complete.

Dogan has a point however. While it is a cool and upcoming technology, it probably wouldn't have been touted as much had HD-DVD not been given dropkick it received. :laugh:

until ISP's get off their ass, upgrade their systems, remove caps and stop overselling themselves then internet based HD video has a future. I'd rather spend ?20 on a BD with a good selection of audio options, extras and the ability to copy to my psp, rather than a <50Gb download.

You people fail to see that (in US alone) broadband speeds by 2009 have been announced to be between 50-100 mbps. Satellite services like xStreadHD have proven quite possible delivering 80mbps streams that can carry full 1080p / 7.1 DTS-MA HD streams and allow you do download them to your hard drives and watch them on any DLNA device in your home (PS3, HD DVD player, computer etc)

As much as it wishes it could the US doesn't control the world and the rest of the world won't have 50-100 mbps internet connections. For about another 25 years so that this will not take off for a long time to come and it will be for the next evolution of video resolution not the 1080 that we have now.

Here in the UK for the standard of broadband is about 8 mbps and this is only achievable for the people that like within less than 1 mile of the telephone exchange after that the speed drops off extremely fast.

ADSL2+ is also many years off here and that can only achieve 24 mbps speeds.

There are still large amounts of people in the UK that can only use a 56 kbps modem to get online.

until ISP's get off their ass, upgrade their systems, remove caps and stop overselling themselves then internet based HD video has a future. I'd rather spend ?20 on a BD with a good selection of audio options, extras and the ability to copy to my psp, rather than a <50Gb download.

And yes good point gonna download a 30GB movie on your limited bandwidth of about 20GB per month.

Finish it off next month.

Edited by atkinsn2000
Dogan has a point however. While it is a cool and upcoming technology, it probably wouldn't have been touted as much had HD-DVD not been given dropkick it received. :laugh:

I doubt it. These techs and services have been in the works for a while now: MS's IPTV?

I honestly think it was a timed release for CES and with little relation to HD-DVDs facially received "dropkick". To each their own.

However I'll add a bit that I doubt has been mentioned but I've thought about before. HD as a whole will probably never take off in the manner many people think it will. As it stands we live in a mobile society where mp3's and iPods rule the day. Not full 1080p 60fps @ 120hz or 96/24 bit and 192/24 bit Hi-fi audio sources; not to mention this stuff takes up a lot of space.

If they did DVDA and SACD would have taken off years ago amongst everyday Americans who in turn decided mp3's were much more practical and Apple in a stroke of genius marketed on what the market was desiring, an iPod.

As much as it wishes it could the US doesn't control the world and the rest of the world won't have 50-100 mbps internet connections. For about another 25 years so that this will not take off for a long time to come and it will be for the next evolution of video resolution not the 1080 that we have now.

I think you have researched information very poorly.

USA is number 18 or so on the list of broadband speeds in various countries. So it's hardly leading. Meaning that other countries in Europe and Asia have much faster connections even now, going over 100mbps in japan I think.

If you think that digital distribution is 25 years away I think you are in for a HUGE surprise. It's already HERE, it just doesn't do HD. Xbox Live with over 10 million users offers TV shows and movies in 720p now. I don't hear people complaining or not downloading. It's obviously very popular.

XStreamHD like technologies offer smart approaches. The only mistake they can make is create an unfriendly digital management of the assets you download, nothing more and of course very expensive monthly subscription. I think, juding by their intentions this will not happen. They are on a very positive path to have a kick ass HD service for everyone.

Links:

http://www.internetinnovation.org/tabid/56.../7/Default.aspx

Japan had 100 mbps capability in 2005:

http://www.physorg.com/news7068.html

US broadband trailing other countries:

http://blogs.computerworld.com/node/6500

Edited by Boz

Physical media has a long way to go still.

Hell I can't even stream HD movies internally in my house without hiccups/slowdowns (damn wireless).

The best internet speed I can get currently is 2-3MB (on 8MB DSL MAX).

Download limits would suffer under these proposals as well, and the UK loves download limits/"fair use" policies.

another note to add, a lot of people, like myself, like to have a physical collection, I like having a large movie shelf. If a wanna go to a mates and watch a movie I own, all I gotta do is pick it up and go.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!