Need some help choosing a compact digital camera


Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

So i'm heading off on some more travels and thought I'd get myself a shiny new compact digital camera and would love some recommendations. There's a couple of things I'd like:

- uses SD/SDHC cards.

- available to buy in Australia

- around AU$400 (US$350)... willing to go up a bit if its worth it

- be able to record movies with sound at 30fps at good resolution

It would also be very nice if it had a bigger than 3x Optical zoom.... I'm fine with going slightly larger than the very compact digital cameras you can get now.

One of the cameras I've been looking at is the Lumix TZ3. Anyone got any thoughts on that one?

Thanks heaps :)

I was just cruising the forums in search of getting my macbook to run exe files ,when I saw this post. I work in a camera shop and I couldn't help but make some recommendations.

Firstly, the TZ3 is a nice all around camera, however its main drawback is the shutter speed and recovery time after taking a photo. Not good for any sort of burst shooting, even with high speed SD cards.

As mentioned above, just about any Canon is going to give you terrific photos, especially any running on the Digic III processor, which gives you crazy (for a compact) shutter speed and great battery life. Also, Canon cameras are going to give you incredibly vibrant photos, and easy to use menu for saturation and sharpness etc. Some you might want to check out would be the Powershot TX100 which is nice, however does not have a viewfinder. The LCD screen is next to useless in high light situations. The biggest difference between the TX100 and the PowerShot A720 IS is 10x optical zoom on the former and 6x on the A720 IS, but the 720 has a viewfinder on it. I own the 720 IS and it is a powerhouse.

If you were looking for a camera with a Lithium Ion rechargable battary, try almost anything in the Canon SD series, just be warned that the zoom won't approach the TX100 or A720.

If you're doing alot of lowlight photography, the FugiPix S700 (I think) has a higher ISO than most, but the battary life is not going to be as great as a Canon with the Digic III.

For a little bit more, and not as compact, you could try the Canon S5 IS which features 12x optical zoom, more features than you'll know what to do with, and stereo sound recording. The stereo isnt much, as the mics are placed roughly an inch apart, and the difference between it and mono sound is negligable. It's going to be a little bit more than the others and it takes a monsterous 4 battaries. It is just about the nicest Canon (save for the G9) thats not a Digital SLR

Besides that, all I could recommend would be to stay away from Kodak, as the quality of pictures is terrible, and you'll most likely have battary issues with it.

If you're looking at purching from Amazon, I would suggest getting their product service plan or whatever it's called, if you plan on keeping this camera for more than 2 years. The first thing to wear out will be the LCD screen or the zoom lens, and once that happens, it's about $150 (US) to get anyone to look at the thing. For a small fee you can get a new camera once your current one wears out. I had an old Canon 500 series camera, the zoom lens wore out after 3 and a half years, and I got the A720 as the replacement. Pretty sweet deal.

I hope this was helpful to you!

Cheers,

Jiggler

If you want anything over 4x optical zoom, I wouldn't classify it as "compact."

Again, take a look at the Canon's. This would be the like the Powershot G7 or G9.

The Fugipix S700 is pretty good; I've worked with it a bit and was fairly happy with it. One thing it offers is 10x optical zoom while the canons max out at 6x, I think.

Wow! Thanks for the long reply Irish_Jiggler. I'm glad you just stumbled on this thread ;)

I will definitely have a look at the two Canon's you mentioned, however, I did a quick google and couldn't find anything on the Powershot TX100... google came up blank... could you link me to some information about it?

I haven't really looked at the Fuji cameras, mainly because they don't use SD... but I will have a look at the one you mentioned.

Unfortunately I won't be buying from Amazon, I'm in Australia and will find some overpriced shop here ;)

Thanks again :)

And thanks again to you crazzy88ss for your comments!

I apologize, I combined two product numbers. It's the SX 100 IS and the TX1. The SX is the camera I was making reference to, while the TX1 is a camcorder that can record in 720p (I think, havent checked it out for a while) HD, all while taking 7.1 MP pictures with a 10x zoom lens! The biggest drawback is with a 4gig card, you'll get approx. 17 minutes of video. However you can take nice 30fps in 640X480 or 320X240 standerd def which will extend the record time considerably. Also, a nice feature is the ability to take pictures while recording video. Its going to be a little bit more than you were looking to spend, and it's HD recording time is horrendous, but its the only product I know of that is a dedicated camcorder and camera. The fuji does take XD and SD cards, which is why I mentioned it! Thanks Crazy88, I should have mentioned that.

I apologize again for the wrong product numbers!

Food for thought,

Jiggler

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
    • OpenAI is making Codex more useful in Chrome and the cloud by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI's Codex now has more than 5 million users, up nearly 4x from earlier this year. To further accelerate Codex's growth among developers, OpenAI today announced that it has agreed to acquire Ona, a company that builds secure cloud execution and orchestration technology for developers. Ona will enable developers to run Codex with persistent and controlled cloud infrastructure for long-running agentic workflows. Right now, most Codex execution happens locally on developers' laptops and PCs, and the agents work continuously for hours. Through Ona, OpenAI aims to make Codex agents keep working for days without being tied to a user’s local machine or an active session. This will be an important capability for enterprises that want to deploy AI agents in production while maintaining control over infrastructure, data, security boundaries, credential scope, logging, and review workflows. Like any acquisition, the deal is still subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Until the deal closes, OpenAI and Ona will continue to operate as separate companies. After closing, Ona’s team will join the Codex team to improve developer workflows. Alongside the Ona acquisition announcement, OpenAI today introduced a few Codex updates. Developers can now save Codex rate limit resets and use them later instead of losing them when they are not needed immediately. OpenAI is also adding a referral option where users can invite a friend to Codex and get a saved rate limit reset. OpenAI today also announced a developer mode for browser use in Chrome and the Codex in-app browser. With this mode, Codex can use the Chrome DevTools Protocol to debug web apps, inspect pages, and work more directly with browser-based development workflows. Developers can use this when they want Codex to profile JavaScript, inspect console output and network traffic, examine web page states including the DOM and applied styles, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      186
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!