• 0

Definitive Best Antivirus 2008


Definitive Best Antivirus  

1595 members have voted

  1. 1. Your choice?

    • Antivir
      101
    • Avast!
      119
    • AVG
      215
    • BitDefender
      32
    • Clamwin
      4
    • F-Secure
      7
    • Kaspersky
      250
    • McAfee
      21
    • NOD32
      660
    • Norton
      47
    • Panda
      3
    • Sophos
      7
    • Symantec (Corporate)
      61
    • Trend
      8
    • VBA32
      1
    • Windows OneCare
      26
    • Zone
      7
    • Other (please specify below)
      26


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
ESET needs more threat analysts and some new blood in the programming team too.

I have a three year license for NOD32 and I hate to think I wasted a lot of money on a product that fails to step up when it's required.

Got my fingers crossed that NOD32 V3.5 or V4 (whatever major release is next), really does something amazing.

I actually just tried the 30-day trial. Wasn't bad at all. Detection rates were pretty good; assuming the viruses I found on purpose were common.

I use Kaspersky Internet Security 2009; I have a 1-year license. It expires in 261 days. :cry:

IMO, Kaspersky is the ideal security software for anyone. They update almost hourly and the detection rate is higher than any other AV app.

  • 0
I actually just tried the 30-day trial. Wasn't bad at all. Detection rates were pretty good; assuming the viruses I found on purpose were common.

I use Kaspersky Internet Security 2009; I have a 1-year license. It expires in 261 days. :cry:

IMO, Kaspersky is the ideal security software for anyone. They update almost hourly and the detection rate is higher than any other AV app.

Kaspersky is real good (Y) I agree with you.

Funny thing is this must be about the second weekend in a row that ESET has actually released updates on the weekend. Maybe *gasp* they have some fresh staff that work weekends?

  • 0
Kaspersky is real good (Y) I agree with you.

Funny thing is this must be about the second weekend in a row that ESET has actually released updates on the weekend. Maybe *gasp* they have some fresh staff that work weekends?

I agree. NOD32 has lost their charm and become a just-above-average AV. however, in the last days it seems they have doubled their update rates. let's hope they get their 5hit together. my license will expire in 40 days and it's very probable that I'll go with Avira Antivir Premium. I really like NOD32 and hope some light will shine on the horizon before I make the change. heck, there's not even a new version announced or expected anytime soon.

  • 0

Kaspersky China has organized an online event where they give away 1-year activation codes to members of their online forum who have met certain conditions, so I registered an account there and got a free copy of KIS 2009 to replace the Norton 2007 on my work laptop. I have to say it's a GIGANTIC improvement over Norton 2007, both in terms of performance and usability. And even more so than Kaspersky 7.0 back then, which hogged my system down to a crawl so I had to uninstall it immediately.

So yea, Kaspersky 2009 is a really great improvement to the performance. Don't know about Norton 2009 though, heard it's also quite light on resource.

  • 0
IMO, Kaspersky is the ideal security software for anyone. They update almost hourly and the detection rate is higher than any other AV app.

personally I'm not sure if the hourly update is a good or bad thing. doing extra frequent update may mean they have less time to QA those updates, thus more prone to false positives? Kaspersky earned itself a nickname of "the king of false positives" back when it had 22 critical false positives in the first half of 2007, some of them removing critical Windows system files resulting in system crash on restart. Norton also earned itself some bad reputation last year when it removed two critical system files from the CHS version of Windows XP, thus rendering thousands of PCs inoperable. Ironically, since older versions of Norton have a slower update frequency, their users are saved from this mess.

  • 0
yeah, tried it before. its fast.

i'm also using kaspersky 2009, which eats all my 2gb ram during full scan. what a shame :(

Kaspersky is working on a CF2 (Critical Fix 2) build and some of the replies seem to indicate that RAM usage is better?!

  • 0

Yeah. Long story but I got caught with some .vbs / autorun viruses and NOD32 did foo-all.

I tried Kaspersky for 30 days. Cleaned my PC and detected some more viruses on my flash drive.

Kaspersky just sold me two, two year licenses for KAV2009 (Y)

  • 0

I don't know all that preaching about NOD32. I tested the program for the last month and got 3 BSOD's because of it.

Yesterday I installed Avira AntiVir Premium. It found 1 viruses, 2 trojans and 4 malware applications. I guess I'll stick with it for the time being.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!