Asus M2N32-sli deluxe how to set bios


Recommended Posts

Trying to find any help in how to set the bios up so that it will run this DDR2-1000 at the correct speed.

I have set all the timings and voltages to the correct timings but can't find anywhere to set the speed to 1000

If anyone has this same mobo or has had similar problems any suggestions would be greatly appreciated...

See specs below....

Think I have it figured out sort of.... :wacko:

right now I appear to be running stable after running several benchmarks and super pi and some prime...

along with normal gaming.....

I am at 3195mhz 1.34v (highest setting I tried so far until I get new HSF)

memory is 523mhz with fsb/6 5-5-5-15 2.0v (have not tried different timings as of yet)

so now my memory is over the DDR2 1000 which I was trying to reach earlier... Not sure if there is away just to change the setting in the bios to raise the memory to run at its standard default of DDR2 1000 and not ddr2 800....Only settings in bios I have are DDR2 400/533/667/800...I hope but doubt they will do an updated bios just to increase the stepping in memory as it is getting faster and faster....

Right now I am on the stock HSF and I am running idle at 41c with only an external exhaust fan running at the back of the machine until my new quieter fans come in tomorrow....

Does anyone have a chart or link to share that gives safe temperatures for this CPU? AMD AM2 5200+ 65w

I saw it reach about 52c while I was doing benchmarks tests and gaming but I do know that temp will drop after air flow returns with the new fans...

Think I have it figured out sort of.... :wacko:

right now I appear to be running stable after running several benchmarks and super pi and some prime...

along with normal gaming.....

I am at 3195mhz 1.34v (highest setting I tried so far until I get new HSF)

memory is 523mhz with fsb/6 5-5-5-15 2.0v (have not tried different timings as of yet)

so now my memory is over the DDR2 1000 which I was trying to reach earlier... Not sure if there is away just to change the setting in the bios to raise the memory to run at its standard default of DDR2 1000 and not ddr2 800....Only settings in bios I have are DDR2 400/533/667/800...I hope but doubt they will do an updated bios just to increase the stepping in memory as it is getting faster and faster....

Right now I am on the stock HSF and I am running idle at 41c with only an external exhaust fan running at the back of the machine until my new quieter fans come in tomorrow....

Does anyone have a chart or link to share that gives safe temperatures for this CPU? AMD AM2 5200+ 65w

I saw it reach about 52c while I was doing benchmarks tests and gaming but I do know that temp will drop after air flow returns with the new fans...

BIOS version 1503 should provide the settings you seek as it is an update to support socket AM2+ (Phenom) I would procede with caution though as I beleive some people were having problems with the HT link speed multiplier defaulting to 1x with this BIOS. Asus BIOS 1503

Product information for your CPU can be viewed here. X2 5200+ specs AMD

BIOS version 1503 should provide the settings you seek as it is an update to support socket AM2+ (Phenom) I would procede with caution though as I beleive some people were having problems with the HT link speed multiplier defaulting to 1x with this BIOS. Asus BIOS 1503

Product information for your CPU can be viewed here. X2 5200+ specs AMD

Thanks for the links....

Not sure what is going on with the Asus Probe II it is reading 42c most of the time then it will instantly jump to say 49-53c then back down....This was happening a lot at first now it is pretty much stablized around 40-42c idle still a little on the warm side for my liking...as I came off my old system Opteron 165 OC @ 2.75 and ran much cooler at 29-31c........

This motherboard is running @ 37c which appears to be pretty normal. Any idea on the CPU? I used just the stock HSF with the thermal pad it came with. Tempted to pull it out clean it of and AS5 it....but I have used stock hsf before with thermal pads and never ran this warm right out of the box....

I took the OCing off and back at stock speeds and CPU 1.25v........

Granted also I have all fans hooked up to motherboard plugs none are on their own power...

Think it would help to plug them straight into their own power?

This is how my fans are set up and the RPM and CFM they are running...If you see something I should do say swap out the exhaust with the front intake I might do so if people think it would benefit the air flow and cooling...

Front of case intake Scythe S-FLEX SFF21E 120mm Case Fan 49cfm @1200rpm 20.1dba 120mm

Side of case intake SILVERSTONE FN82 80mm Case Fan 36.89cfm @ 2100rpm 26dba 80mm

Rear exhaust EVERCOOL SFF-12 120mm Case Fan 80cfm @ 2000rpm <25dba 120mm

Not including the stock PSU 120mm fan for exhaust as well....

Only down fall with the 80cfm is it is the loudest of them all but most of that is the fact it is blowing the air out the holes in the back and that is what is actually causing the noise not the fan itself....

I don't think it really matters about which fan is in front or back but if I am wrong please let me know...Just trying to get the temps down even lower than what they are now....

and YES I am going to be looking also for a better aftermarket HSF but have read where some people are having problems find units that will fit this board and not conflict with the heatpipe cooling that is on the board.....

So suggestions on the HSF as well as if I should move my fans around would be greatly appreciated...

I know this thing is going to be easy to OC as I have had it to 3.2ghz so far with only increasing the fsb and lowering the HTT leaving the DDR2 setting on 800, Locked all the other settings and left CPU Voltage on auto but at 3.2ghz it went up to 1.34 which I still don't think is that high...

Wondering if anyone knows how to boost the fan on the heatsink as it normally runs around 3000rpm but it is rated 3000-6000rpm.

I have looked through the bios and only notice I can change the q-fan in bios from optimal/quiet/performance, or disabled....

I have tried all settings but nothing seems to change the rpms... Any ideas?

I found out why my CPU temps were changing the way they were...had something still running in background on boot-up... :blush:

I do think I am safer than I thought I was as I just played crysis on higher settings for about an hour with the pc-probe II cpu temp (all other closed) on top and never saw it get above 48c...still think I could get better overall temps with a better HSF....Think I am going to swap out the stock HSF that came with my old Opteron 165 (with 4 heatpipes) and see how it does tomorrow....

One thing I feel I should mention is that I doubt you are stable at those speeds/specs. The reasons I say this is game play is one thing but true stability is quite another. Why is stability important? B/c one day you don't want a BSOD that results in loss of data. I recommend running Orthos Stress Pirme for @ least 6hours on Blended or Small FFT to determine your true stability.

Another thing is Asus Probe is not a good indication of core temps. For a AMD CPU I recommend Core Temp 0.96.1 as it is much more accurate than Speedfan (total crap for AMD) or Asus probe.

Is Orthos better than Prime95? I have been running Prime95 stress test now going on 8 hours now and not slowing down this machine at all....as I sit here and type this Temps are still not going above 51c. I took the OC back up to where I had it until I was concerned about the heat but after gaming and the temps did not rise much decided to put it back to the OC settings....still running strong..I have be away from my computer most of the day today but I will continue running Prime and see just how long it runs before crapping out...

Prime95 was still going until about an hour ago when I shut it down ran for just over 16 1/2 hours.... :woot: at 3.2ghz so to that seems pretty stable...

Still wondering though if Orthos test does different or more deep stress testing?...

It does indeed sound pretty stable! Orthos does the same thing as Prime95 just in a niftier package, as long as testing with 2 instances or Prime95 (one for each core) or using the latest version that test's both cores it's just as good as Orthos really.

I have now swapped out heatsinks and fan....from the stock one that came with the 5200+ to the stock one that came with my opty 165 with 4 heatpipes... I have dropped -5c now running at 37-38c idle and also my motherboard temps have also dropped too by -5c...now running at 32-33c.... What if any difference would I see with an aftermarket HSF???

The reason I ask the last question is that I know the 4 heatpipe stock HSF is very close and better performance to some of after market units you can buy...

Any aftermarket units that can work in the Asus M2N32-sli deluxe that might out perform the stock 4 pipe? Please on suggest HSF units that will work this board as I have heard people having problems getting some units to work with this board can be a total pain if not impossible as the heatpipe cooling on the motherboard can get in the way of some of the larger units...

Ok I wanted to throw up several screen shots real quick to show just some of the settings and such as you can see Prime is running in the background again this time (about 6 hours during this test so far). I lowered from 3.2ghz backed off to 3.0ghz only difference I did was took the multiplier down from 12 to 11. I was also curious about the HTT so I just kicked it back up to x5 and so it is running at 1375 or 2750 :D I also took the cpu voltage off of auto and set them to 1.30v which is .05 increase over stock...

So far can't complain about this set-up having had 2 successful OC's 1st at 3.2ghz and now backed it down to 3.0ghz...

Also wanted to say I put the memory on a divider now as well was running well over specs at DDR2 1000 (in bios had to set it to ddr2 1066...but now at DDR2 800)

I am trying to see just how high I can go with just the CPU and HTT then once I error out I will lower the HTT and find out if it is stable again...Then I will start increasing the memory until I find my highest OVERCLOCK which is stable for both the CPU and MEMORY....

Here are the pics...

Might want to add incase someone sees my temps it is going between 51-55c which I feel comfortable with the system temps as they instantly drop back down to upper 30's when I shut down dual prime...Still would like to find a better HSF unit that might keep it around 50c or better under load which would make me feel even better.... :yes:

post-65183-1200735883_thumb.jpg

post-65183-1200735935.jpg

Still stable at 3.1ghz 282x11 @ 1.32v 41-42c idle/55c 100% load

HTT is 1410 282x5

Just how high does this go? I thought it was limited to closer to 1000

Also once the memory starts reaching the DDR2 1200 range CPU-Z goes blank in the:

Frequency: (blank)

FSB/DRAM: (blank)

yet all the timings are correct.....why might this be does CPU-Z not go that high for the memory?

took the DDR2 setting back up to 1066 setting in bios @ 2.0v

dual prime 95 or 2 hours still running still running strong....

everything I have thrown at his so far has not given me 1 blue screen or any faults in prime....either I have a heck of a CPU and memory or something is not registering right......hope it is the CPU/Ram....

Also in Vista scoring I am now at 5.5 cpu and 5.9 for everything else....before at stock settings I was 5.1 cpu and 5.9 for everything else...

Stepping on CPU just if anyone is wondering are

ADO5200IAA6CZ

CCB8F 0727RPMW

1724004670646

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!