The Great UAC Debate!


UAC  

1412 members have voted

  1. 1. Do You Use UAC?

    • Yes
      477
    • Yes, On "Silent Mode"
      91
    • No (I use an Admin Account)
      496
    • No (I use a Standard Account)
      39
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      118
  2. 2. Have You Ever Been Saved By UAC?

    • Yes
      226
    • No
      932
    • I don't use Windows Vista
      106


Recommended Posts

UAC is fine for most, I used UAC Tweak to put it into quiet mode but even still it stopped Speedfan from displayig my HDD temps and SMART status as I use Speedfan to monitor them on a daily basis.

I've had UAC off since Vista came out last year and have had zero problems. Then again why should I have problems? why should my machine suddenly become exposed to these "hackers" and "vulnerabilities" when before Vista I was running XP pro for years in exactly the same manner without a single security incident?

I think some people are using UAC = Ultimate protection 24/7 as a scaremongering tactic. Sure it will teach developers to be better at making their apps but there's more opensource and freeware apps out there that more people use than paid for apps, these guys make such software in their spare time for the good of their target communities.

We know the apps do good and it's frustrating when it doesn't work as intended due to UAC not allowing it to function correctly (my example is speedfan, UAC doesn't even prompt to elevate for instance which is a bit crap).

As a power user, turning off UAC isn't going to make the security of my OS any less secure due to the fact that we (people like myself) already have 3rd party apps doing the protection and we know when something is wrong.

mrk, I believe you need to run Speedfan as an administrator (right-click on Speedfan.exe and click run as admin).

I do agree with you though that UAC is needless. It's gone over. I did a format and reinstall after a year of running Vista with UAC off. I reinstalled not because of any problems because of UAC being disabled. It's because I have been installing too much junk. A software tester, I am.

Now, I have not bothered to turn off UAC yet but I am being forced to and will do very soon. There are programs that just don't work with UAC in the way. One being NFS HS. It crashes to the desktop when I try to start it. Some game mods (like the 3rd person view mod in HaloPC won't even work under UAC but did before I reinstalled Windows.

Then I suggest educating yourself on the need for it by reading parts of this thread.

With all due respect, your opinion is only one side of the debate - are you suggesting that anyone who doesn't agree with your position needs further eductaion? It's his system - if he want's UAC disabled that's absolutely fine.

If you want an off/on option for every function of the OS, build your own. If you aren't happy with the configuration options available in Windows, there are several feedback channels available to you. If that's not good enough, don't buy it. Use something else. If there isn't something that suits your needs, tough luck.

I'm sorry Brandon, but if you guys at Microsoft really think that way, I think a lot of users are going to heed your advice... because, from my experience with OS X and Linux, they have nothing as insanely annoying as UAC. :)

I believed they allow you to disable UAC because UAC is a new technology and having it permanently enabled would have dire consequences with old or incomputable software. They should really leave the option to disable or enable UAC to our decision.

Okay, another UAC annoyance that I hope can be eventually ironed out:

Now I see why I prefer to install game demos on XP and then switch over to Vista to play them. Right now I'm trying to run 3DMark2006's installer on Vista and it's taking anywhere from 2 to 3 minutes just for Vista to verify the file's integrity before popping up the UAC dialog. Can't imagine how bad it would be to launch said installer over a wireless network - it'll probably take 5 minutes just to verify the file.

Good thing developers are moving to bundling installers into an archive and including a small .EXE file, but that still leaves those installers who rely on InstallShield SFXes. In the meanwhile, something like a shell dialog reading "Verify the file, please wait..." similar to the File Attributes Change dialog would be nice so users won't accidentally launch the file twice thinking the first attempt failed.

UAC enable: Quicken can't find Internet connection. Most other programs crash upon install or when I try to use them. Disable UAC everything works.

Let say I never used a PC. I go out and buy a new machine. All my program crashes because MS says I have no rights to run them. I can see this turning new users off to the PC.

UAC enable: Quicken can't find Internet connection. Most other programs crash upon install or when I try to use them. Disable UAC everything works.

Let say I never used a PC. I go out and buy a new machine. All my program crashes because MS says I have no rights to run them. I can see this turning new users off to the PC.

That's not how UAC works. It doesn't affect whether an application can access the internet. You obviously had some other compatibility or configuration problem with your version of Quicken.

Apps aren't going to crash because UAC is enabled. If there's a particular app that doesn't request elevation and doesn't have an app compat flag set for it, then you can right-click and click "Run As Administrator" and now it's running exactly as if UAC had been disabled. If that's really necessary for your old version of Quicken (though I doubt that it is), you can check the "Always run with Administrator privileges" box in the app or shortcut properties page.

I'm sorry Brandon, but if you guys at Microsoft really think that way, I think a lot of users are going to heed your advice... because, from my experience with OS X and Linux, they have nothing as insanely annoying as UAC. :)

Won't happen.

If users (and I mean a statistically significant number, not Neowin members) wanted those options, we'd build them. We don't build them becuause nobody wants them, and there are better things to be building that people do want. Perhaps you misread my statement?

I have it on, but might turn it off because of that damn windows defender popup about startup programs not being started.

There is a workaround for this problem.

0. Disable the program's built-in autostart up with Windows mechanism (use msconfig to see if the program requires parameters or switches). Take note of those if needed. We'll use the Task Scheduler instead.

1. Type in the search box for "Task Scheduler". A UAC prompt will appear.

2. Create a new task

3. Put a check mark on "Run with highest privileges"

4. Under the "Action" tab, select the program you want to run at start up.

Your programs can now run with admin privileges without Windows Defender blocking at logon and startup. Let us know if this works. I use this for RM CPU Clock Utility from getting blocked at every startup on my laptop.

I actually have Windows Defender disabled and use SpywareTerminator with HIPS instead.

UAC and all other variations of it on other operating systems for the loss! (if you are an advanced computer user).

It may help people who don't know what they're doing, but it's just an annoyance for me. I also hate how UAC is seen like a bad thing, but many other OS's implement a similar system, yet people don't gripe about those.

Common sense if you have it is more effective than UAC (or any type of UAC on other OS's) will ever be.

I have UAC enabled simply because it's NOT an annoyance once all your software are installed initially. I know exactly when UAC should and should not prompt. The shields on icons are clues. If it prompts without reason (i.e. without me explicitly performing a task that requires an elevation), then something is not right.

I don't blindly click on ALLOW for everything. Common sense also tells drivers AND passengers to wear seatbelt.

Edited by KevinN206
There is a workaround for this problem.

0. Disable the program's built-in autostart up with Windows mechanism (use msconfig to see if the program requires parameters or switches). Take note of those if needed. We'll use the Task Scheduler instead.

1. Type in the search box for "Task Scheduler". A UAC prompt will appear.

2. Create a new task

3. Put a check mark on "Run with highest privileges"

4. Under the "Action" tab, select the program you want to run at start up.

Your programs can now run with admin privileges without Windows Defender blocking at logon and startup. Let us know if this works. I use this for RM CPU Clock Utility from getting blocked at every startup on my laptop.

I actually have Windows Defender disabled and use SpywareTerminator with HIPS instead.

You may have to uncheck the Power section under "Conditions" tab for laptop users. Otherwise, it won't run unless using AC.

I'm sorry Brandon, but if you guys at Microsoft really think that way, I think a lot of users are going to heed your advice... because, from my experience with OS X and Linux, they have nothing as insanely annoying as UAC. :)

Don't worry about Brandon. He has no clue about security or what people want, I don't think he has any sort of position in Microsoft where he has any influence whatsoever.

I note with interest Vista SP1 actually removes some UAC prompts (at least thats a START!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stopped using Windows as my main workflow. Migrated completed to Linux. Been happier than a clam without a single issue nor windows annoyance. Leaving Windows has shown me the light at the end of the tunnel, or rather I went through the tunnel and I'm already at the light.
    • AirPods Pro 3 are now available for only $179 by Taras Buria Apple's third-gen AirPods Pro 3 introduced a few important upgrades over the previous generation while retaining the old $249 price. Still, that is quite a lot of money for a pair of earbuds, but the good news is that right now, you can save quite a lot of money on them, thanks to a new all-time low price. AirPods Pro 3 retain their classic look and form factor, with changes focused on the inside. These earbuds now come with five sets of foam-silicone tips, which sit much more securely in your ear, making the earbuds a perfect choice for physical activities and workouts. Additionally, new tips provide better passive noise cancellation. Speaking of noise cancellation, ANC is now much better at blocking outside noise, with Apple claiming the AirPods Pro mute up to two times more sound than the AirPods Pro 2. The AirPods Pro 3 also have heart rate sensors for activity tracking during workouts. They also support Live Translation and Hearing Aid mode. As for battery life, you get up to 8 hours on a single charge, with the case adding 20 more. The case supports wireless (Qi or Apple Watch charger) and wired charging over USB Type-C (cable not included). AirPods Pro 3 - $179 | $50 off on Amazon US This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit the Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus, or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Everything I have read is that the BBC is still Pro Doctor Who but wants a solid plan before they let anyone else try to do it. Which is fair.
    • I totally agree no one should trust governments AND big tech companies that have near monopolies in certain market segments. The difference is of course citizens at least have some say in government. Yes, requiring Apple to open up Sirsi to other AI backends is in the interest of EU customers and certainly "opens" up the platform a crack. What are you saying? I wish the US would regulate tech companies more here and even break them up in some cases. Granted trusting the government to do it right is a crap shot at best but what is the alternative? To allow a few tech companies to continue to run everything and just print money? It's crazy to me for example that in most of the world 99% of communications go thru Facebook servers via WhatsApp. What kind of dystopian world are we living in?
    • You can.. make sure you have ADB tools on whatever OS you are running, plug your phone into your PC give it approval to talk to the phone then run this command. adb shell pm uninstall -k --user 0 com.android.chrome So long as you leave Android Webview untouched it wont break anything on your Phone to do this. I have been using exclusively Firefox mobile since it was released.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      204
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!