Windows XP x64 vs Vista x64


Recommended Posts

I've installed XP x64 on my Intel Quad Core Q6600 2.4GHz with 4GB DDR2 800 RAM and an ATI HD 3870XT. I've used 64bit drivers for all hardware and have had a few problems which has mainly been the graphics card, but nothing too major. I was wondering if Vista 64bit would be any better than XP 64bit.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/614941-windows-xp-x64-vs-vista-x64/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Question: Why? Please elaborate.

(I personally don't have any preference between Vista and XP.. both have their highs and lows)

Personal Opinion of the OS with some comparison truths:

Vista is a facemask of XP. XP SP3 is the bug and security enhancements that Vista is without the Eyecandy. Microsoft is pushing for the SP1 of Vista before the release of XP SP3 to try and drive the consumer base to Vista. Vista was a launch to implicate and produce the effects that Apple and Linux has. Vista in my opinion is a major memory hog, beyond the fact that you have a much capable computer to handle it. If you said XP x86 or Vista x64, I would have said the Vista version... primarily because the 64 bit models take advantage of the 3G+ memory. I think that you sacrifice alot by switching to an OS which I think all you REALLY see is the visual aspects of.

I have used the 32 bit of Vista on my laptop for about a year (at least) and noticed major issues. Network printing to a print server is impossible. If I print from a webpage to a networked printer installed on a server, it errors out, every time. My xp desktop will print to this same system flawlessly. I hardly have a problem with Vista in general, but after using Vista for a year and XP since it was in Beta (as well as troubleshooting), XP is the winner in my book. Working in IT, I get users asking all the time.. I got my computer with Vista pre-installed, my wife loves it.. but I hate it... how can I get XP on there???

There will be users out there who love it and users who will hate it... but my opinion is no, stick with XP.

I use Vista x64, never needed any reinstall, everything (besides my free webcam and prehistoric printer) works perfect! The problem with my printer is just that HP doesn't want to make drivers, and the XP x64 drivers don't work...

XP x64 has been abandoned, even MS themself only add Vista support for their 64 bit software.

3rd party software vendors are staying even further away from XP x64. sure XP 64 works, ut if you want more use of that x64, ou'll need Vista. Vista x64 also has drivers being developed for it, unlike XP x64.

XP x64 has been abandoned, even MS themself only add Vista support for their 64 bit software.

3rd party software vendors are staying even further away from XP x64. sure XP 64 works, ut if you want more use of that x64, ou'll need Vista. Vista x64 also has drivers being developed for it, unlike XP x64.

Very true. Microsoft is trying to migrate everyone to Vista and pull them away from XP. Vista is preinstalled on MANY systems you buy today and you actually have to pay MORE to downgrade to the older version.

I still prefer XP :p

As for gaming - yes, only Vista has DX10 (tho I've heard of a group of programmers trying to backwards port it to XP - can't remember name or link off hand). But right now only a a couple of games have native DX10 support.

As for future hardware drivers, Vista is definately a better choice than XP64. Unfortunately, driver support for XP64 never really took off, while alot of hardware has Vista 64 drivers (except for Creative who still pushes their 32 bit drivers for use on a 64 bit OS... :boggle: ).

I've been running Vista 64 as my main OS for the past several months once hardware drivers (nVidia in particular) were in better shape. At launch, Vista had very poor driver support across the board. Today its a different story.

In my opinion, with your system setup, you would be better off running a 64 bit OS and you have more than enough horsepower for Vista. I'd give Vista 64 a run to make sure you like it - either by dual booting or backing up your current setup in case you don't like it. Acronis True Image or Ghost are good choices for backing up your system first.

T

I will try not to bring this thread off topic :p

Yes, DX10 is only capable on Vista, but you will also need a capable video card. The games haven't quite pulled into the DX10 or HDR lighting (bloom) mode and will be surely pulling up fast. Currently you can't really take advantage of the effect because it's just starting to roll out in todays games.

I many times think that the first new gadget that comes out is basically beta.. regardless of the testing. The "have to have it" freaks will buy it up and whatever problems they are faced with gives route for a new distribution. DX10 cards that came out were very costly. But what about DX10.1....

Even though DX10.1 will support current DX10 graphics hardware, today's DX10 hardware will not be able to support all of the features of DX10.1, which includes incremental improvements to 3D rendering quality.

As the saying goes, "Better the devil you know than the devil you don't."

Here's my advice to you: XP is the devil you know, Vista the devil you don't.

Get ahold of some imaging software like Ghost, Acronis, or the like and do an image of your XP setup.

Try Vista.

If it works, go full speed ahead. If not, pull the ripcord and parachute back to your imaged XP install. I find it's a LOT less stressful to try something new if you have an easy "Emergency Stop" button. In fact, my desire to try Linux is what prompted me to do so much work on building my unattended XP install. That way I could install whatever distro I wanted and if it went sour, I wouldn't have to spend so much time getting XP back to the way I liked it - the unattended CD would do it all for me.

The crappy part is that now that I have Ubuntu working so beautifully, that XP unattended CD sits unused. Still, it accomplished its greater purpose.

Anyway, point is that you should try to give yourself an easy out and then give Vista a whirl.

He has a compatible card that will be able to play all the games today in at least high settings. He also has a card that supports DX10.1, so I don't know why your trying to make it sound like a bad thing. XP64 is abandoned, Vista x64 is being worked on as we speak. Makes sense to go with Vista really doesn't it?

While I must admit that when I was beta testing it driver support was almost non-existent, today it's another story. I'm running Vista no problem with x64 drivers for all my hardware. Just look up Vista vs. XP on any modern up to date site and they'll show you where to go.

I had more issues in x64 Vista than x64 XP, and my computer that I built was built in Sept 2007, i'm waiting for SP1 final to roll around and take a chance then, if not i'll wait for Windows 7 in 2 yrs. I'm tired of partitioning for Vista to see how its "better".

zune 64bit software will not install on xp x64, vista only, and that is a trend that will continue i'm afraid. as stated earlier, ms abandon what could have been a really nice os (imo) by dropping almost all support for xp x64. too bad, but vista 64 is working better for me now than xp x64 ever did.

He guys,

me, myself and i am using vista x64 for a week now. and nothing but good experience. but then again. i have a dual xeon cpu (8 cores), 4 gig of ram, nvidia quatro fx 1700 videocard 512MB (directX10 support), etc etc. except for the fact that my raptor keeps rattling sometimes. only when getting updates.

hope you can use any of this info.

pingoof,

Well my xp x64 died a few days ago, explorer started messing up with no themes working. Every thing slowed down and then after a reboot I had NTLDR missing error.

Looks like I'l be going to vista after all.

Do a scan on your hard drive and make sure its not dying (check eventlog for bad block). Sounds like it to me...

  • 1 month later...
XP x64 has been abandoned, even MS themself only add Vista support for their 64 bit software.

3rd party software vendors are staying even further away from XP x64. sure XP 64 works, ut if you want more use of that x64, ou'll need Vista. Vista x64 also has drivers being developed for it, unlike XP x64.

This is completely untrue. Nvidia/AMD(ATI)/Intel all have updated drivers for both XP64/XP32 on the same date. This includes any video card released in the last few years and all chipsets too. You can even see in the readme for the Nvidia video card drivers that they addressed a good 5-6 games fixing bugs and even stating they improved performance! My Edimax wireless card is also supported. So that's all vid cards (does anyone buy anything but these 3, either discreet or onboard?), all chipsets/motherboards (anything since XP I imagine...some really old cards might not work, but heck those suck in vista anyway). Note in the video cards Nvidia's 32/64bit drivers are the latest from Dec07. In ATI/AMD's case it was just last month. Doesn't get more up to date than that.

Also note Vista Ultimate will be abandoned (as you say it) BEFORE xp64. WHY? Because no home OS (XP or vista) or vista Ultimate is BUSINESS related. Ultimate will die in 2012. XP Pro however will live to 5yrs past the next OS. Which happens to be 2009 (supposedly) with Windows 7. That means 2014, and if some are to be believed 2010 because MS might be late making XP Pro live even longer until 2015. This is a dirty little secret but it's on MS website.

http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3223

http://www.crn.com/software/197000329

http://www.intelligententerprise.com/chann...cleID=197000371

Take at look at the drivers for your products before you say this stuff. Do your homework. XP Pro is sold to businesses and as such MUST be fully supported. Don't forget 2003 server is also based on its kernal so that forces even more support for a lot of hardware. Microsoft would like you to BELIEVE it's abandoned but thats just BS. Wake up people quit acting like sheep. If you can prove XP is left behind in benchmarks go for it. You're wrong, and XP SP3 is going to widen the margin between it and Vista another 8-10%. SP1 for Vista meanwhile does NOTHING for performance. Bummer dude. Post your benchmarks, better yet, why are all the hardware sites afraid of benchmarking XP64 vs Vista64? Advertising dollars threatened? They've already made benchmarking SP3 illegal in their eula...LOL. What does that tell you? SP3 came out so fast they don't want it published...ROFLMAO. Think about that. Google this "XP sp3 can't publish benchmarks" without quotes of course. Might add eula to that and get better results but they're there.

To check all MS products go here: http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselect

Vista: http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=11734

Sorry, toast in 2012 unless you have the business edition...Bring on the benchmarks...LOL

Can you list some stuff NOT supported that IS in vista? No ancient stuff please. I mean if you haven't upgraded your part in the last 4 years tough luck. That's ancient in pc time. MS should just stop forcing FISTA and bring out another XP. Hackers have already proven you can get DX10 to work so it has nothing to do with the OS, and the same can be said for Aero (even apps have been released though I haven' t bothered to do it...I kind of like Topdesk, but the all seem to slow me down...Alt tab is all I need or a taskbar...heh). Yeah, I created my account just to address this...ROFL. Misinformation hurts us all. Oops...XP home and MCE have now been added...LOL. I didn't realize the link I gave shows that.

zune 64bit software will not install on xp x64, vista only, and that is a trend that will continue i'm afraid. as stated earlier, ms abandon what could have been a really nice os (imo) by dropping almost all support for xp x64. too bad, but vista 64 is working better for me now than xp x64 ever did.

Does this stop you from installing a 32bit version? :)

Does it run any faster...nope. Anything change? nope.

A side note: Perhaps this is why Zune has no marketshare?...LOL. I thought everyone had an ipod anyway... :devil:

No I hate them...But someone likes them since they've sold what, 100 million? I have an iriver. Because, they're better :)

Just like DirectX 10 this is just MS trying to force us like sheep. Making you think there's a difference. DX 10 hasn't taken off either and won't until they give xp support. Performance sucks anyway.

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/lost_p...mance/page2.asp

Hmm...DX9 also has HDR in it's codepath. Guess that's not missing either...They even gave up on DX10 and tested the rest of the way in DX9 because they couldn't figure out how to get DX10 to win...ROFL.

DX10 looks better: BS.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,2174758,00.asp

While you're there check out the performance. Note that's Aug2007.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2174223,00.asp

Note they tell you they've tested a BUNCH of games. DX10 NEVER wins. "While we continue to wait for a game built upon DirectX 10 from the ground up to wow us with its performance, evidence mounts that DirectX 10 just isn't all it's cracked up to be compared with its predecessor." Doesn't that just about say it all.

Want a performance boost? Dump Vista...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop by Sayan Sen Despite the advent of AI-generated imagery, Adobe's Photoshop remains one of the most popular tools on this planet. Adobe does not have a publicly reported total user count but it's probably not wrong to assume there are millions. As of 2025, Adobe Creative Cloud has had approximately 41 million paid subscribers, many of whom likely use Photoshop. In addition, more than 166,000 companies worldwide are apparently also using the app. These figures are according to a very recent report by SQ Magazine. Out of them, it is fair to assume that many are probably running Windows. As such, there is good news for these users as Microsoft has announced Photoshop is getting a big 20% performance boost on x86-64 (AMD64) systems and a 13% bump-up on Arm devices. This is definitely great news for them as many have complained about the slow performance and general sluggishness of Photoshop on Windows 11 ever since the advent of the latter back in 2021. If you are wondering how Microsoft managed to do this, the answer lies in a combination of compiler-level optimizations and a technology called Sample Profile Guided Optimization (SPGO). According to Microsoft, Adobe worked closely with the company’s Visual C++ team and adopted the latest MSVC toolchain enhancements together with SPGO to squeeze more performance out of Photoshop’s CPU-bound workloads. Unlike traditional Profile Guided Optimization (PGO), which requires developers to create special instrumented builds and run lengthy training workloads, SPGO gathers performance data directly from optimized release binaries. This means Adobe could collect real-world usage information which gives a major advantage to this technique, as companies could leverage data collected from actual customer workloads rather than only relying on synthetic benchmark runs. In theory, this should allow optimizations to better reflect how users interact with software in the real world. Thanks to this, there are improvements to code layout, function inlining, hot-and-cold code separation, and other low-level tweaks that help processors execute instructions more efficiently. Essentially the compiler is better able to identify “hot” code paths, those which are most frequently executed, and optimize them accordingly.
    • "The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months¨ I'd prefer to see the lowest price in over a year
    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!