Windows XP x64 vs Vista x64


Recommended Posts

Umm...Did you read the benchmarks I pointed to? Latest hardware out tested a week ago, VISTA SUCKS compared to XP. You don't call a GTX280 or ATI 4870x2's modern? GTX260? All tests show Vista loses to XP on the same machines. Sorry, check the tweaktown articles (any with vid card tests, all this year...All the same...Vista loses badly).

Nuff said.

Point me to benchmarks showing both, and a vista victory. I'm waiting...You won't find one. Vista is SLOWER. SP1 didn't help it either...LOL.

Your argument is pointless. I have no interest in your 3rd party benchmarks. I'm more interested in what I see firsthand, and on my machine, Vista outperforms XP by a large margin, and judging by many of the responses in this thread, I'm not alone, so take your interwebz benchmarks and your 7 year old Windows eXPired OS and go away.

XP x64 is a great OS. I don't know what everybody is whining about driver-wise, I had drivers for all my hardware. However, I did have to generally download them and install them myself. It ran just as fine as XP 32-bit, and the only software incompatibility I had that inconvenienced me at all was Styler toolbar. However, just like XP 32-bit, after I'd been using it for a while and had installed a zillion applications it started to slow down a bit. Generally a positive experience.

I've been running Vista 64-bit since it was released, and betas of it before then. It is an outstanding OS. I've had no driver issues at all (all of my hardware has always just worked out of the box, no need to download anything) except that I have installed nVidia's video drivers to ensure the best performance in my games. All of my software works, except Styler toolbar :) (I don't know if it even runs on Vista 32-bit, either, but why would you want it to; there is no longer a need). I do have issues running some extremely antiquated games, but they didn't run on XP, either. Personally, if you have the hardware to support it, I'd use Vista.

Ok so to sum up your post for those that don't need to read all that text: You have no dea what you're talking about.

I think you should find some real facts and not listen to every "Vista sucks" internet rumour and "tests" by users who've never even seen a vista disk.

So the evidence from a known hardware site (tweaktown) with a LOT of benchmarks showing XP beating Vista is pointless, and they've never seen a vista disc?

Steve Gibson from GRC.com (he's a genius, or did you miss that part? Never heard of shieldsup, or spinrite eh? FANTASTIC CODING!) is an idiot?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Gibson_...ter_programmer)

Leo Laporte hasn't seen a Vista disc? You're aware of who he is right? ZDnet mean anything to you? Call For Help TV show must have passed you by (it's still on isn't it?)? These people aren't spouting internet rumors. They are all knowledgeable, well known PC people in this industry.

Peter Guttman doesn't know what a vista disc looks like?...ROFL. Look at his wiki bio:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Gutmann...uter_scientist)

He knows a thing or two about vista since he wrote a famed article about it...He's got a PHD in Computer science...ROFL. Yeah, all these people are idiots and just spread rumors. Guttman's nothing but a computer security genius, he's stupid...WTF? I hope people take a look at the data/examples I've given, and ignore your BS one liners with nothing supporting your comments.

I give you 3 computer experts, hardware review sites, a dozen+ links to countries, schools, govt's BANNING Vista etc...

You give us "I think you should find some real facts and not listen to every "Vista sucks" internet rumour and "tests" by users who've never even seen a vista disk."...LOL.

Umm...I thought I gave about a thousand facts, and all VERY REAL. Where is your proof it's better than XP? Your opinions are useless. How about giving us some "real facts" as you call them, to back up your BS statement?

PC World magazine gave Vista the top tech disappointment of the year award for 2007:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/140583-5/th...ts_of_2007.html

Yeah, they don't know what a vista disc is either...Just more rumor crap...LOL. It's pretty bad when a windows magazine rates you as the worst product of the year...LOL.

You got anything to back up what you say? You only have to be able to read English to know that I do. Read this thread, there's a ton all in here...LOL.

benchmarks are done on 1 kind of hardware only, i notice this too: on my acer aspire 5170 Vista (32 bits in this case) is faster than XP, and it's easily visible: boot, shutdown, startup applications, etc... (i don't play games so i won't compare to gaming speed but professional usage only)

But on another computer i've (desktop), vista is actually slower. So i guess it's caused by 2 things:

1. Drivers - probably the most important thing, stable and optimized drivers get vista fast

2. Benchmarks are generally fine, but they never work on the single, as each person has different hardware and it can cause problems (or slowdown) on each system

So the evidence from a known hardware site (tweaktown) with a LOT of benchmarks showing XP beating Vista is pointless, and they've never seen a vista disc?

Steve Gibson from GRC.com (he's a genius, or did you miss that part? Never heard of shieldsup, or spinrite eh? FANTASTIC CODING!) is an idiot?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Gibson_...ter_programmer)

Leo Laporte hasn't seen a Vista disc? You're aware of who he is right? ZDnet mean anything to you? Call For Help TV show must have passed you by (it's still on isn't it?)? These people aren't spouting internet rumors. They are all knowledgeable, well known PC people in this industry.

Peter Guttman doesn't know what a vista disc looks like?...ROFL. Look at his wiki bio:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Gutmann...uter_scientist)

He knows a thing or two about vista since he wrote a famed article about it...He's got a PHD in Computer science...ROFL. Yeah, all these people are idiots and just spread rumors. Guttman's nothing but a computer security genius, he's stupid...WTF? I hope people take a look at the data/examples I've given, and ignore your BS one liners with nothing supporting your comments.

I give you 3 computer experts, hardware review sites, a dozen+ links to countries, schools, govt's BANNING Vista etc...

You give us "I think you should find some real facts and not listen to every "Vista sucks" internet rumour and "tests" by users who've never even seen a vista disk."...LOL.

Umm...I thought I gave about a thousand facts, and all VERY REAL. Where is your proof it's better than XP? Your opinions are useless. How about giving us some "real facts" as you call them, to back up your BS statement?

PC World magazine gave Vista the top tech disappointment of the year award for 2007:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/140583-5/th...ts_of_2007.html

Yeah, they don't know what a vista disc is either...Just more rumor crap...LOL. It's pretty bad when a windows magazine rates you as the worst product of the year...LOL.

You got anything to back up what you say? You only have to be able to read English to know that I do. Read this thread, there's a ton all in here...LOL.

Some random self important programmers.. well I'm sure they're opinios ae worth more than the thousands of other at least as good developers who says otherwise, and tweaktown... yeah riiight. whatever...

oh somone with a PHD.... wow he can't be full of opinionated BS. As for ZDNet, it's in the same league as PWorld. sensationalists BS sites/magazines that get more visitors and thus ad money from negative news, false or not. Mostly false.

Fact is your ignorant and uniformed as well as very very wrong rambling about Vista DRM, and drm in Vista drivers quite obviusly show that wherever you get your information are not very trustworthy sources.

Get bak to us when you actually know what you're talking about. Read up on DRM, Read up on Vista, Read up on DRM in vista, then install Vista and compare it real performance on your computer. Then read up on driver developement on Vista and how it's better and on the new Audio system as well as graphics system.

and maybe even learn to make up your own opinion, and no rely on the opinion of "famous" internet people. Especially when you seem oblivius to the agenda of the people and sites you look up to.

Your argument is pointless. I have no interest in your 3rd party benchmarks. I'm more interested in what I see firsthand, and on my machine, Vista outperforms XP by a large margin, and judging by many of the responses in this thread, I'm not alone, so take your interwebz benchmarks and your 7 year old Windows eXPired OS and go away.

Spoken like someone lacking evidence. Ignorance is bliss they say...

FYI Microsoft will "expire" Vista Ultimate BEFORE XP64. XP64 will get support until 2014. Vista Ultimate will...NOT. :) 2012...sorry..

http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex

Vista and XP are at the bottom. Note XP Pro is a business OS, so it's there until 2014. Vista Ultimate is NOT. However, if you're a person wanting vista, I'd suggest BUSINESS edition, as you have a right to downgrade to XP (yippie), and you get longer support.

XP SUPPORT:

http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=8599

Vista Ulti:

http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?LN...15&p1=11922

Bummer dude. 2012. :)

My OS won't expire until 2014...How about yours?

Well, I can't say you're ignorant now...You've been informed...LOL. What now braniac?

Sorry if you find informing potential buyers they should think twice about Vista so offensive...Tough luck. When Vista gets better (I mean IF) I'll stop telling people about evidence against it. Which currently, is still mounting! Including this months benchmarking by tweaktown.com.

I fail to see how an overbloated DRM infested OS could possibly run faster than XP on your machine (any machine). It's just not possible. Do you do anything with your pc besides browse the web? Games are slower. Office is slower (you can google this too...office2007 on vista vs. xp shows xp/2007 runs a lot faster), etc. Color me amazed. You've got the only pc on the planet that runs XP slower than Vista, and buy a "LARGE MARGIN". Wow...I digress...

Some random self important programmers.. well I'm sure they're opinios ae worth more than the thousands of other at least as good developers who says otherwise, and tweaktown... yeah riiight. whatever...

oh somone with a PHD.... wow he can't be full of opinionated BS. As for ZDNet, it's in the same league as PWorld. sensationalists BS sites/magazines that get more visitors and thus ad money from negative news, false or not. Mostly false.

Fact is your ignorant and uniformed as well as very very wrong rambling about Vista DRM, and drm in Vista drivers quite obviusly show that wherever you get your information are not very trustworthy sources.

Get bak to us when you actually know what you're talking about. Read up on DRM, Read up on Vista, Read up on DRM in vista, then install Vista and compare it real performance on your computer. Then read up on driver developement on Vista and how it's better and on the new Audio system as well as graphics system.

and maybe even learn to make up your own opinion, and no rely on the opinion of "famous" internet people. Especially when you seem oblivius to the agenda of the people and sites you look up to.

Please, by all means...Point me to these developer comments. Please, point me to how great DRM is in Vista. Umm...I've owned a PC business for 8yrs, I think I've installed vista a few times. I'm a PC technician who now has to support Vista. I think I know a bit about it. The entire point of pointing to others is to show that it isn't JUST MY OPINION. It's PROOF, or do you have no concept of what proof is? All of the govt's, organizations, schools etc I pointed out are BANNING the use of Vista isn't enough evidence for you??...LOL.

The links I gave in the other post show multiple PRO AUDIO people saying BAG VISTA, it's not good for audio development. With thousands in audio equipment, using it daily for their living, they probably don't know what they're talking about either...LOL.

So point me to the people saying driver development for Video/Audio hardware is great on Vista. I also await the links to people high on DRM in Vista and just loving having to work with it.

I'm waiting....Links to both please. No links to Microsoft employees either...ROFL. They don't count. No links to RIAA/MPAA related people either. Obviously they don't count, they paid to get DRM INTO Vista. You got anything even resembling support for your opinion (yeah, YOUR opinion)? Links please.

I'm currently running Vista x64 on my new machine and so far so good. I haven't had any problems with it. It's fast and reliable. I think it hasn't crashed, at least I don't remember it having, only been 3 weeks since I got it. As for reboots, so far only when I get asked to after an update.

Wow, same tired arguments, over and over, with "LOL" and "ROFL" interspersed between. I wonder if we can get him to do other tricks, like argue that black is white.

I guess when buried by the mountain of evidence against vista, the best a supporter can come up with is comments about acronyms eh?

You got anything better than that? How about some evidence to argue against my mountain of evidence? Is that too much to ask?

You can attack me all you want. Unfortunately it doesn't change ANY of the data I presented.

Unfortunately for you, those arguments you call "tired" are still completely true. Sorry. MS should have just slapped DX10 and Aero on XP and called it a day (hackers have proved you can do this already). Maybe a few other "enhancements" could have been added (some like the search - though you can add the same function without vista via 3rd party): but the rest of vista was just a waste of time in order to make media mafia happy and take away more of our digital rights. So which media company do you work for... :)

Here's a trick I'd like to see you do: Point to evidence supporting your opinions. :devil:

Pandya you still smiling? How about something from you?... :)

benchmarks are done on 1 kind of hardware only, i notice this too: on my acer aspire 5170 Vista (32 bits in this case) is faster than XP, and it's easily visible: boot, shutdown, startup applications, etc... (i don't play games so i won't compare to gaming speed but professional usage only)

But on another computer i've (desktop), vista is actually slower. So i guess it's caused by 2 things:

1. Drivers - probably the most important thing, stable and optimized drivers get vista fast

2. Benchmarks are generally fine, but they never work on the single, as each person has different hardware and it can cause problems (or slowdown) on each system

The visible stuff you're referring to is nothing more than optimizing for system/os files to be in the best locations on the drive (outside edge of your hard drive), also the most used apps. That's all that's needed for what you're seeing and it can be had by many programs that do exactly what Vista does in this regard. PERFECT DISK being one of them (Raxco software makes it). Note the cost of a PerfectDisk license is a LOT cheaper than buying Vista, and will get the same improvements for XP. You tell it what you want to open etc the fastest and it optimizes the layout of the drive with OS/Sys files and most used apps in the best places. Perfect Disk will even protect these files from ever being moved in the future if desired. A nice touch. Anyway, the point is, XP version 2 could have had the same thing easily (same with DX10 and Aero) as noted with apps like perfectdisk.

This is NOT going to improve the performance of anything REAL in usage speed. Your game or app will still run slow after it loads unfortunately. How fast the OS boots or shuts down is not improving my USAGE of the OS one bit. Good drivers are good for any OS. That's a no brainer. I don't understand your 2nd point. Personally I only boot my PC once a month or so, and usually when forced by updates to any of my OS's.

I'll end saying there's a reason Microsoft is spending 300 MILLION to put lipstick on this pig. Heck, they're even hiring Jerry Seinfeld to help...LOL. A good product SELLS IT'S SELF. A bad one needs 300 Million worth of lipstick to help it sell even a year and a half after it's been out. That's just sad. Worse, Windows7 is Vista SP2.

The visible stuff you're referring to is nothing more than optimizing for system/os files to be in the best locations on the drive (outside edge of your hard drive), also the most used apps. That's all that's needed for what you're seeing and it can be had by many programs that do exactly what Vista does in this regard. PERFECT DISK being one of them (Raxco software makes it). Note the cost of a PerfectDisk license is a LOT cheaper than buying Vista, and will get the same improvements for XP. You tell it what you want to open etc the fastest and it optimizes the layout of the drive with OS/Sys files and most used apps in the best places. Perfect Disk will even protect these files from ever being moved in the future if desired. A nice touch. Anyway, the point is, XP version 2 could have had the same thing easily (same with DX10 and Aero) as noted with apps like perfectdisk.

This is NOT going to improve the performance of anything REAL in usage speed. Your game or app will still run slow after it loads unfortunately. How fast the OS boots or shuts down is not improving my USAGE of the OS one bit. Good drivers are good for any OS. That's a no brainer. I don't understand your 2nd point. Personally I only boot my PC once a month or so, and usually when forced by updates to any of my OS's.

I'll end saying there's a reason Microsoft is spending 300 MILLION to put lipstick on this pig. Heck, they're even hiring Jerry Seinfeld to help...LOL. A good product SELLS IT'S SELF. A bad one needs 300 Million worth of lipstick to help it sell even a year and a half after it's been out. That's just sad. Worse, Windows7 is Vista SP2.

I use, and I think most of us here use Vista because we like it, it seems (to most ppl that actually tried) more stable, more responsive than xp during everyday usage as long as you meet the minimum requirements. Gamewise so far I haven't had any problem with it, everything has worked so far even rly old games and I haven't noticed any slowdown compared to XP.

I tried Vista on a PIII-1GHz and it worked flawlessly (yes Aero was disabled obviously I couldn't expect it to run smoothly with it) and it was as fast as XP. Yes Vista sure needs some more work, but it isn't the horrid thing as ppl say. 99% of ppl base their talk on what others say and twist it and make it sound worse.

I never listen to what so called computer experts say, they can have 100 PhDs for all I care. It's an OS, I gotta try it for myself and decide on my own afterwards. I may like certain features they don't, my hardware configuration might actually mix up better than theirs with Vista, I don't know, that's why I have to try it.

Try it, give it a chance, if you don't like it after a while then go back, that's my suggestion.

  • 2 weeks later...
I'd go with Vista x64, considering the driver support for Vista 64 seems to be much better than XP 64.

What gives you the idea that support is better for Vista64? How did you form your opinion? What product is better supported in Vista64 than XP64? Please provide links. I always see this kind of comment with NOTHING to back it up. So please, enlighten me. My previous posts showed there are drivers for every current part on the market for XP64. You can check for yourself on Nvidia, AMD (ATI), Intel, Via, HP, any NIC producer (dlink, linksys, Edimax etc). So what are you referring to?

I use, and I think most of us here use Vista because we like it, it seems (to most ppl that actually tried) more stable, more responsive than xp during everyday usage as long as you meet the minimum requirements. Gamewise so far I haven't had any problem with it, everything has worked so far even rly old games and I haven't noticed any slowdown compared to XP.

I tried Vista on a PIII-1GHz and it worked flawlessly (yes Aero was disabled obviously I couldn't expect it to run smoothly with it) and it was as fast as XP. Yes Vista sure needs some more work, but it isn't the horrid thing as ppl say. 99% of ppl base their talk on what others say and twist it and make it sound worse.

I never listen to what so called computer experts say, they can have 100 PhDs for all I care. It's an OS, I gotta try it for myself and decide on my own afterwards. I may like certain features they don't, my hardware configuration might actually mix up better than theirs with Vista, I don't know, that's why I have to try it.

Try it, give it a chance, if you don't like it after a while then go back, that's my suggestion.

Most of the users out there couldn't re-install an OS even if we gave them step by step instructions, let alone trying it by themselves. It's just a fact. On top of that, new PC buyers won't have an XP disc to toss in to accomplish this task, among other problems with this idea. For some people money doesn't grow on trees, and trying vista isn't cheap. If you have no idea how to install an OS your idea is problematic.

By your reasoning I guess we should all just skip school, college professors are idiots etc. Hardware review sites don't know squat about pc's. Millions of unsatisfied users of Vista are complaining about nothing etc. People with exploding laptop batteries must not know how to work their laptops. I can build a better cpu than Intel, so they should just quit the cpu business...I'm taking up open heart surgery tomorrow because I can do it better than doctors etc...You're thought process doesn't make sense. Ignoring a 100 PHD's? If a guy actually had that many, I wouldn't bother to question his intelligence on many things. That's a heck of an accomplishment...LOL. Surely he's smarter than I, especially when he comes backed with data.

At some point mountains of evidence must be paid some attention. If you can install an OS without problems and are more than capable of fixing your pc after a Vista snafu, sure try it. In all other cases, XP does everything Vista does, and usually faster, so why bother? A pretty face doesn't make it any better. Having said that, I have tried it (as have many that complain) and see nothing worth paying for. I don't see how you can surmise the majority of users here use Vista either. Numbers in surveys show otherwise. Numbers from Gartner, HP, Steampowered.com etc show otherwise. Based on numbers, XP is the dominant OS on the market by a LARGE margin. I find it humorous that you can so easily dismiss 99% of people's complaints as just twisting what others say and they've never tried the OS. Is that your professional opinion?...ROFL.

Yes....It's slower...Look at the benchmarks I provided (and linked to, go read them yourself). I suppose you think WinME was great too eh? How about MS BOB...ROFL. Some things are duds. It happens in hardware too. Take a look at the intro to Barcy from AMD...Slower than the last chips at launch and still today...LOL. Or how about the first P4, beaten to a pulp by P3's until it past a few revs to 1.7ghz or so. You must work for MS, you sound like an ad for them...LOL. "I have no proof it's not a turd, and despite all evidence pointing to it being a turd, I'll just ask you if you actually think we could make a turd after 5 years of development?"...ROFL. Dear god man...Mistakes happen.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2302498,00.asp

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/amd_nv...ate/default.asp

How bout you use some recent benchmarks buddy?

An a modern machine with at least 2 gb of ram vista is just as fast if not faster than xp and especially with recent drivers most problems have been resolved, now stop trolling kthx.

If you compare vista to ME you are an idiot.

Wow was just browsing this section (hadn't been here in years) and noticed this. Well I have been using Vista since it came out RTM and it is working great. No major issues at all! If it was XP installed, it would've slowed down so much that I would have had to format it. With XP I needed to format AT LEAST once a year, now one of my computers that is running Vista hasn't been formatted since it came out. The other one I formatted because I had 2GB of RAM and upgraded to 4GB but 32 bit version didn't see more then 3GB. With Vista, the same serial works for both versions, so I just downloaded the 64bit CD and installed it using my old serial.

Worse, Windows7 is Vista SP2.

How the **** would you know anything like that? Even though you are totally wrong about Vista, I am positive you have never used the retail build of Windows 7 to be able to judge it.

Also, why does everyone complain so much about RAM usage? 2GB of RAM is only $40! That is 4 times Vista's required and twice its recommended.

4 years ago, I paid 40GB for 256MB of RAM, and that is also 4 times the required. But be serious, is XP going to run well with 256MB? NO. It needs 512MB to run well, that would have been $80 4 years ago.

Edited by mrp04
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

LOL

Thank you TheJian. It's nice to see that some people still have a brain and do some research before opening their mouths.

I've used all desktop versions of Windows that were released to date, and Vista is the worst Windows NT ever released. One just has to look at the adoption rates or the way Microsoft is desperately promoting Windows 7 already (not to mention the "Mojave experiment").

A Mac with a 350Mhz G4 and a Geforce2 could do the transparency and all other "effects" which require a higher-end PC to be done (but worse) on Vista. Not to mention DRM and its implications throughout the OS.

If Bill Gates himself says that Vista sucks, the case is closed:

http://gizmodo.com/342920/holy-crap-did-bi...y-windows-sucks

you don't even know what mojave was do you... :rolleyes: not to mention any of the rest.

Mojave was a desperate attempt (in a controlled environment of course, LOL) to show how Vista doesn't suck.

The kind of thing that a company would resort to only if the product was a failure.

I give you Bill Gates saying that Vista sucks, but you give me an empty one liner. LOL!!!

the mojave experience they called it :ike: more like teh suckage. they do it in a controlled environment , and picked the about 2 people out of 1000 that said: "it Doesn't suck THAT BAD", but they were 75 year olds with Alzheimer

Mojave was a desperate attempt (in a controlled environment of course, LOL) to show how Vista doesn't suck.

The kind of thing that a company would resort to only if the product was a failure.

I give you Bill Gates saying that Vista sucks, but you give me an empty one liner. LOL!!!

*yawn* Go away, kid. You don't know how to use a computer obviously. Use XP if you want, but the rest of us who don't want to use Windows eXPired with its Explorer hangs and susceptibility to Windows rot and malware infestations will be here in 2008.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!