Windows Vista SP1 RC Refresh 2


Recommended Posts

->s0121

Some moderators might not like what you did, but I personally thank you for that! Now let's just spread the word, post this on torrent sites and have couple thousands of people download this build and squash as many bugs as possible :)

yeah because we all know everyone who downloads service pack beta's when not authorised to do so do it purely with the intention of submitting bug reports to microsoft :rolleyes:

for all the people getting all upset that it's leaked and you aren't as exclusive as you'd like to be just relax. Before MS gave it to a "select group of 15,000 testers" they knew another 100,000 would have anyways. Almost everything that goes on at MS (or anywhere) gets leaked anyways so it's not such a big deal.

If Microsoft gets a few extra 50,000 error reports cuz of it think they are gonna complain? It doesn't affect you and it doesn't affect them in a bad way so relax and enjoy the fact that you got it from it's original source and had exclusivity for about 10 mins. LOL

Unless you a corporate TAP tester you're never going to test stuff that actually matters so I am not sure why people think they are very important or part of a select group because they are MS beta tester, everyone is - get over it and stop being NDA police.

It is not always about that, it is about the fact that people are breaking what are effectively legally binding agreements, and leaking downloads that people are not meant to have access to, just to get themselves a bit of coverage. At the end of the day, put it in whatever light you want breaking NDA's is both illegal and immoral as you are breaking the trust put in you when you are accepted into a Beta. What makes me laugh is that Neowin have such a stringent policy on warez, yet they allow the leaking of information despite the fact that it is just as illegal as leaking actual downloads.

And to say that people aren't "testing stuff that matters" is a little bit blase when you consider that SP1 could be what makes or breaks Windows Vista.

Ya. Used Acronis and restored an image of vista w/o any sp's installed, and then installed this.

Oh, I thought you will have other solutions, as I am having the same problem, thanks anyway, I will probably just want for the final release, as there are some stuff on my PC that I don't have disc and I really can't reinstall it.

Ya. Used Acronis and restored an image of vista w/o any sp's installed, and then installed this.

Same here! That is the easiest way of doing things, while ensuring there are no traces of an older SP RC. The only thing I dislike about SP1 is it always deactivates Vista (I just rearm it for the time being until SP1 goes live).

Same here! That is the easiest way of doing things, while ensuring there are no traces of an older SP RC. The only thing I dislike about SP1 is it always deactivates Vista (I just rearm it for the time being until SP1 goes live).

Never had to re-activate here for any of the builds.. weird.

Never had to re-activate here for any of the builds.. weird.

Ahh I forgot to mention something. I ALWAYS install SP1 builds on a fresh copy of Vista THEN install all of my drivers. I found that if I activate Vista before I install the drivers, then install the drivers that it deactivates itself. My guess is my video card is to blame since it always deactivates once I install its drivers. Sort of a pain considering that I need to call MS just because I installed a driver and my genuine copy of Vista is now deactivated!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!