The Golden Compass (2007)


Recommended Posts

I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

It was so hard to pay attention with movies like this, because they are just so dreadful to watch. It was such a predictable movie, like all the other kids movies. Maybe it's a movie just for the kids, but if you hate Harry Potter, stay away from this movie.

1/10 (N)(N)(N)(N)

Edited by lylesback2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/616286-the-golden-compass-2007/
Share on other sites

I'm glad you disliked it because of its content.

I am truly against everyone who doesn't see a movie just because "its got an atheist meaning", oh come on. You go to a movie to watch a movie, stop over thinking it, a lot of people destroyed the movie's reputation labeling it an atheist movie.

@Bluewind_89 : I loved the book also!

I'm glad you disliked it because of its content.

I am truly against everyone who doesn't see a movie just because "its got an atheist meaning", oh come on. You go to a movie to watch a movie, stop over thinking it, a lot of people destroyed the movie's reputation labeling it an atheist movie.

@Bluewind_89 : I loved the book also!

Did you see the movie. If so, how was it- I haven't seen it yet.

Did you see the movie. If so, how was it- I haven't seen it yet.

I'm not a fan of re-makes because when your reading the book you tend to "make" your own movie in your mind, but this one presented it pretty good. I would say just see if because you liked the book, same as Harry Potter, if you liked the books, I don't think the movie ruins the books, but I don't think you should watch the movie then the read book.

Danger: Here be spoilers.

I debated reviewing this one myself after I saw it but couldn't really put my feelings into words.

I had made sure to read the entire His Dark Materials trilogy prior to seeing TGC when it came out so I had a good idea of the world Pullman was trying to create.

The movie did not successfully duplicate it. It produced a very artificial version of Pullman's vision and, while performances were good all around (Richards is pretty much exactly how I pictured Lyra when reading the books, and has her mannerisms down to a science), failed to evoke the same strange wonder that the books did so beautifully.

To create atmosphere in a story requires setup and the movie, either for lack of time or talent (I had never heard of the director, Weitz, before this), didn't provide adequate setup to establish the feel of Lyra's world. Little things, terms like "anbaric" and "naphtha," the detail that the Master of Jordan College had beaten Lyra as punishment for antics, the bit with Lyra and Roger getting p*ssed drunk in the crypt, the part where Mrs. Coulter made Pantalaimon look away while she was bathing Lyra, all these tiny details lend so much to the kind of people the characters are or the kind of world they live in and so very many of them were stripped out.

The intercision machine was, I thought, ill-portrayed. In fact, the entire Bolvangar sequence was given the shaft - I'm talking Death Star reactor shaft, complete with emperor falling to his death - in the movie. The book had Lyra spending weeks at the facility, whereas the film showed her there for...hours? Minutes?

And dammit, when children (people in general) are intercised, they die. They don't get real sad and have to go find their daemon, no, they live for a few days as zombies and then drop dead. That was the whole point of Lyra's discovery of Tony Makarios (Billy Costa in the movie) in the shed with his dead fish (piece of fur in the movie). It was to demonstrate the horror of what the Magisterium was doing to children. These kids weren't having their friends taken away, they were having their souls cut out. Weitz aimed for a PG-13 rating for TGC, but maybe they should have just made it an R. At least then the major ideas Pullman put forth would have been preserved.

I can only wonder what they're going to do with Will's hand when he comes into possession of the Subtle Knife, assuming TSK is actually made into a movie.

I hate to say this but I "pwned" myself by watching this movie. I wish I could photoshop the date on my movie ticket, re-attach the piece that was ripped off, and get a refund. This movie was absolutely awful. If you thought this movie would be good because it starred Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig... guess again. It's badness in its purest form. Don't bother wasting your time and money watching a run down film like this. The book narrated by an old granny is more interesting.

The book narrated by an old granny is more interesting.

That said, the book narrated by anyone, or read as text, is far more interesting and I forgot to emphasize in my previous comment that one should not let the lacklustre film put them off from reading the wonderful books. I would highly advise at least reading TGC, if not the whole trilogy, before seeing the film. The books are among the most magical things I've ever read. Richer and better-realized than Harry Potter, more interesting and engaging than Narnia. Really the only great fantasy work I've read thus far (and I still have yet to read the works of Jordan, Brooks, McCaffrey, and Goodkind, but I promise I will) that trumps HDM is the ubiquitous Lord of the Rings.

HDM really, truly is a great read. It goes quick and will leave you feeling much more fulfilled than its contemporaries like HP and Narnia.

EDIT: Just noticed this.

After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film.

Erm...have you seen Pan's Labyrinth? Granted, it's fantasy, but I'd hardly put it in the same class as Harry Potter. To date, I haven't seen Harry literally smash Draco's face in with a wine bottle.

  • 2 months later...

Nicole Kidman is NOT Mrs. Coulter. She is about the worst casting they could have done for the part.

The movie is an atrocious rendition of the book, and I am not looking forward to the next one. Still, it is a good fantasy tale and does better than other movies by looking beyond the aspects of condensing the novel into a movie.

3/5

I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

It was so hard to pay attention with movies like this, because they are just so dreadful to watch. It was such a predictable movie, like all the other kids movies. Maybe it's a movie just for the kids, but if you hate Harry Potter, stay away from this movie.

1/10 (N)(N)(N)(N)

Pans labyrinth was almost a masterpiece!

I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

Did I see a different Pan's Labyrinth???? First off the film is R and it is in Spanish. Reading from what you said it looks like you never saw Pan's Labyrinth.

I do agree however the Golden Compass was boring and long, it also felt like it had an agenda.

Yeah, the book is a lot better. I never thought daemon was pronounced "dee-mon". I thought it "day-mon" or even "dah-mon".

Hahaha yeah, I fully agree! (Day-Mon) (kinda like Digimon, lol)

Nicole Kidman is NOT Mrs. Coulter. She is about the worst casting they could have done for the part.

The movie is an atrocious rendition of the book, and I am not looking forward to the next one. Still, it is a good fantasy tale and does better than other movies by looking beyond the aspects of condensing the novel into a movie.

3/5

Kinda reminds me of the terrible casting for the dragon-lady in Beowulf... I found the graphics pretty cool, till they put in an actress everyone knows!

Why do they always **** up good fantasy books in movies? Arrrghh! Just let the author of the book convert it to a script!!!

This was and still is one of my favourite books. I didn't watch the film at the cinema and don't think I will, book to movie conversions hardly ever manage to capture the book properly.

I really don't want the magic of this book to be spoiled by bad acting and not sticking to the story. This may mean I'm small minded but hey, I really don't care. :p

Don't watch the movie!

Every good fantasy book has been killed when converted to Cinema... though Obernewtyn... they had better make that into a movie, but NOT stuff it up!

Panarchy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!