The Golden Compass (2007)

By Andrew Lyle
in Movie Ratings

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Andrew Lyle Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted (edited)

I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

It was so hard to pay attention with movies like this, because they are just so dreadful to watch. It was such a predictable movie, like all the other kids movies. Maybe it's a movie just for the kids, but if you hate Harry Potter, stay away from this movie.

1/10 (N)(N)(N)(N)

Edited by lylesback2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/616286-the-golden-compass-2007/
Share on other sites
Mentor

HideAndGoatse

Posted
Posted

I'm glad you disliked it because of its content.

I am truly against everyone who doesn't see a movie just because "its got an atheist meaning", oh come on. You go to a movie to watch a movie, stop over thinking it, a lot of people destroyed the movie's reputation labeling it an atheist movie.

@Bluewind_89 : I loved the book also!

Mentor

bluewind.

Posted
Posted
I'm glad you disliked it because of its content.

I am truly against everyone who doesn't see a movie just because "its got an atheist meaning", oh come on. You go to a movie to watch a movie, stop over thinking it, a lot of people destroyed the movie's reputation labeling it an atheist movie.

@Bluewind_89 : I loved the book also!

Did you see the movie. If so, how was it- I haven't seen it yet.

Mentor

HideAndGoatse

Posted
Posted
Did you see the movie. If so, how was it- I haven't seen it yet.

I'm not a fan of re-makes because when your reading the book you tend to "make" your own movie in your mind, but this one presented it pretty good. I would say just see if because you liked the book, same as Harry Potter, if you liked the books, I don't think the movie ruins the books, but I don't think you should watch the movie then the read book.

Veteran

CelticWhisper

Posted
Posted

Danger: Here be spoilers.

I debated reviewing this one myself after I saw it but couldn't really put my feelings into words.

I had made sure to read the entire His Dark Materials trilogy prior to seeing TGC when it came out so I had a good idea of the world Pullman was trying to create.

The movie did not successfully duplicate it. It produced a very artificial version of Pullman's vision and, while performances were good all around (Richards is pretty much exactly how I pictured Lyra when reading the books, and has her mannerisms down to a science), failed to evoke the same strange wonder that the books did so beautifully.

To create atmosphere in a story requires setup and the movie, either for lack of time or talent (I had never heard of the director, Weitz, before this), didn't provide adequate setup to establish the feel of Lyra's world. Little things, terms like "anbaric" and "naphtha," the detail that the Master of Jordan College had beaten Lyra as punishment for antics, the bit with Lyra and Roger getting p*ssed drunk in the crypt, the part where Mrs. Coulter made Pantalaimon look away while she was bathing Lyra, all these tiny details lend so much to the kind of people the characters are or the kind of world they live in and so very many of them were stripped out.

The intercision machine was, I thought, ill-portrayed. In fact, the entire Bolvangar sequence was given the shaft - I'm talking Death Star reactor shaft, complete with emperor falling to his death - in the movie. The book had Lyra spending weeks at the facility, whereas the film showed her there for...hours? Minutes?

And dammit, when children (people in general) are intercised, they die. They don't get real sad and have to go find their daemon, no, they live for a few days as zombies and then drop dead. That was the whole point of Lyra's discovery of Tony Makarios (Billy Costa in the movie) in the shed with his dead fish (piece of fur in the movie). It was to demonstrate the horror of what the Magisterium was doing to children. These kids weren't having their friends taken away, they were having their souls cut out. Weitz aimed for a PG-13 rating for TGC, but maybe they should have just made it an R. At least then the major ideas Pullman put forth would have been preserved.

I can only wonder what they're going to do with Will's hand when he comes into possession of the Subtle Knife, assuming TSK is actually made into a movie.

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I hate to say this but I "pwned" myself by watching this movie. I wish I could photoshop the date on my movie ticket, re-attach the piece that was ripped off, and get a refund. This movie was absolutely awful. If you thought this movie would be good because it starred Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig... guess again. It's badness in its purest form. Don't bother wasting your time and money watching a run down film like this. The book narrated by an old granny is more interesting.

Veteran

CelticWhisper

Posted
Posted
The book narrated by an old granny is more interesting.

That said, the book narrated by anyone, or read as text, is far more interesting and I forgot to emphasize in my previous comment that one should not let the lacklustre film put them off from reading the wonderful books. I would highly advise at least reading TGC, if not the whole trilogy, before seeing the film. The books are among the most magical things I've ever read. Richer and better-realized than Harry Potter, more interesting and engaging than Narnia. Really the only great fantasy work I've read thus far (and I still have yet to read the works of Jordan, Brooks, McCaffrey, and Goodkind, but I promise I will) that trumps HDM is the ubiquitous Lord of the Rings.

HDM really, truly is a great read. It goes quick and will leave you feeling much more fulfilled than its contemporaries like HP and Narnia.

EDIT: Just noticed this.

After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film.

Erm...have you seen Pan's Labyrinth? Granted, it's fantasy, but I'd hardly put it in the same class as Harry Potter. To date, I haven't seen Harry literally smash Draco's face in with a wine bottle.

  • 2 months later...
Rookie

MarauderX

Posted
Posted

Nicole Kidman is NOT Mrs. Coulter. She is about the worst casting they could have done for the part.

The movie is an atrocious rendition of the book, and I am not looking forward to the next one. Still, it is a good fantasy tale and does better than other movies by looking beyond the aspects of condensing the novel into a movie.

3/5

Grand Master

Julius Caro

Posted
Posted
I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

It was so hard to pay attention with movies like this, because they are just so dreadful to watch. It was such a predictable movie, like all the other kids movies. Maybe it's a movie just for the kids, but if you hate Harry Potter, stay away from this movie.

1/10 (N)(N)(N)(N)

Pans labyrinth was almost a masterpiece!

Contributor

golemn

Posted
Posted
I was roped into seeing this, because there was a "bear fight" and it was a must see. After a few minutes into this movie, it became clear this was another Harry Potter, and Pans Labyrinth type of film. These kinds of british children action movies are really annoying, and very very boring. The Golden Compass was no exception to this rule.

Did I see a different Pan's Labyrinth???? First off the film is R and it is in Spanish. Reading from what you said it looks like you never saw Pan's Labyrinth.

I do agree however the Golden Compass was boring and long, it also felt like it had an agenda.

Experienced

Panarchy

Posted
Posted
Yeah, the book is a lot better. I never thought daemon was pronounced "dee-mon". I thought it "day-mon" or even "dah-mon".

Hahaha yeah, I fully agree! (Day-Mon) (kinda like Digimon, lol)

Nicole Kidman is NOT Mrs. Coulter. She is about the worst casting they could have done for the part.

The movie is an atrocious rendition of the book, and I am not looking forward to the next one. Still, it is a good fantasy tale and does better than other movies by looking beyond the aspects of condensing the novel into a movie.

3/5

Kinda reminds me of the terrible casting for the dragon-lady in Beowulf... I found the graphics pretty cool, till they put in an actress everyone knows!

Why do they always **** up good fantasy books in movies? Arrrghh! Just let the author of the book convert it to a script!!!

This was and still is one of my favourite books. I didn't watch the film at the cinema and don't think I will, book to movie conversions hardly ever manage to capture the book properly.

I really don't want the magic of this book to be spoiled by bad acting and not sticking to the story. This may mean I'm small minded but hey, I really don't care. :p

Don't watch the movie!

Every good fantasy book has been killed when converted to Cinema... though Obernewtyn... they had better make that into a movie, but NOT stuff it up!

Panarchy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.