Windows 7 'build' on BitTorrent is bogus

[Slimy]

Fueled by rumors about Microsoft Corp.'s next operating system, pranksters have taken to posting what they claim are leaked builds of Windows 7, but which are, according to downloaders, just fake disk images full of nothing. According to the Windows enthusiast site Neowin, several BitTorrent sites have been seeded with files posing as the M1 -- for Milestone 1 -- build of Windows 7, an early preview version of Windows Vista's successor meant for Microsoft's hardware partners. But downloaders commenting on Neowin, as well as those on BitTorrrent sites such as Pirate Bay, have confirmed that the disk images are bogus. "It's fake. I [downloaded] 10% and opened with a hex editor, just strings of [zeros]," said a Neowin commenter identified as bjc4ever yesterday.

Although searches using the string "Windows 7" at Pirate Bay initially brought up results, while Computerworld was examining the results and reading downloader comments, the site pulled the listing. One commenter, however, put it this way: "FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE." Interest in Windows 7 spiked last week when a poster to a Neowin forum leaked what he claimed were details of the new operating system, and bloggers spread the story. Speculation has also been driven by the anonymous blogger authoring "Shipping Seven: Random thoughts from somebody working on the next Windows OS," primarily because the writer claims to be a Microsoft developer.

Source: ComputerWorld

[Ambroos]

aww :(

[HawkMan]

Well at least it was niceof TPB to pull the listing of fake warez ;)

[DigitalE]

I'm not surprised. :hmmm:

[The_Decryptor Veteran]

"It's fake. I [downloaded] 10% and opened with a hex editor, just strings of [zeros]," said a Neowin commenter identified as bjc4ever yesterday

Remember that when downloading files, some BitTorrent clients will pre-allocate the space on disk, which is filled with 0's, so when 90% of the file is still un-downloaded, odds are you'll see a whole bunch of 0's in the file (remember that BitTorrent might not start from the beginning of the file, it might be the end).

Not saying it's real, but just opening a 10% downloaded file and seeing free space doesn't mean it's invalid.

[Randolph]

This has been leaked for awhile now. I think this thread is "bogus".