"Nightmare on Elm Street" Remake


Recommended Posts

I think he means even in a cameo Englund would add SO much to the movie. And I agree actually. They have to squeeze him in someplace. He IS Freddy, forever.

EXACTLY.. I mean come on.. I grew up watching Englund as Krueger, it's going to be weird seeing someone place play such an iconic role..

6856id.png

I mean look at him, need I say more?

Well, the kid from Bad News Bears certainly grew up to be a weird ass looking guy, so sure he can play Freddy! lol

And god, did I love Englund in New Nightmare. He was soooo spooky (as both Demon Freddy and himself).

"Hey Dillion, ever play....skin the cat?" lol awesome. Then he proceeds to kill that poor babysitter chick. Awwww the kid got sad. Then ran across a freeway with one of the best scenes ever (and the most awesome music ever) for a Nightmare scene lol

Way to be an *******.
I think he means even in a cameo Englund would add SO much to the movie. And I agree actually. They have to squeeze him in someplace. He IS Freddy, forever.

Sorry, but if he will be in this movie as a cameo then his performance doesn't matter at all.

A good script and a good director makes the movie, not so much for the actors. Countless of times we have seen mediocre actors doing timeless performances because the director's handling.

Another point: Krueger's character was a mix between makeup, special effects, lighting effects and sound editing, not so much because Englund's acting. Since Jackie Earle Haley is ten times the actor Englung never was I'm sure that if the script is decent and the special effects and make up departments are efficient this new Freddy will be just as good if not a lot better.

Since Jackie Earle Haley is ten times the actor Englung never was I'm sure that if the script is decent and the special effects and make up departments are efficient this new Freddy will be just as good if not a lot better.

What other *BIG* thing did Robert Englund do? He seem to be happy to play in low-quality low-budget movies, that's all.

The only other place I remember Englung was in "V".... My god, I feel old just now....

Teaser Details!

We're reporting live from the San Diego Comic Con where Warner Bros. Pictures just showed the first ever footage from New Line Cinema and Platinum Dunes' reboot of A Nightmare on Elm Street, which now arrives in theaters April 30, 2010. We're gonna pop up the Q+A when it shows up online, but until then, read on for the footage description.

The clip opens in an exterior shot of an old abandoned factory where Freddy Krueger (as a man) is being chased by a mob to the building. Clancy Brown's character lights a bottle with fire, Freddy yells, "What do you think I did?"

He gets lit up, lights on fire, runs outside screaming.

Cut to the twins, one with a slash in her clothes.

Shot of Freddy's hat.

Back to twins jump roping.

Close-up of Freddy's glove scratching steel.

Freddy's hat agan on a box, silence, Freddy's eyes appear behind them.

They show the girl in a blood body bag in the school.

Close-up of scratchhhhhhh, sparks.

Rooney Mara (Nancy) is in the boiler room. It's dark Freddy is there, walking towards her.

Flashes begin, we see all sorts of imagery ranging from Tina floating to the ceiling, slashes and then LOGO. Bam.

"Ready or not, here I come." - Jackie Earle Hely as your new Freddy Krueger.

Scrrrrratttcchhhhh....

[bloody disgusting]

That sounds amazing!

The few things I was hoping they kept from the original are Tina's death and Glen's death. Hopefully they'll be based on how they looked in the original before they got cut to shreds.

For anyone who doesn't know, Tina's death was originally A LOT more bloody and Glen came OUT of the bed after the blood shot up through it. You can find a small snippet of Glen coming out of the bed on YouTube I think and I don't think Wes Craven was able to shoot Tina's death they way he original thought of it. He described it as a large bubble of blood forming between Tina and the bed as she's on the ceiling and that's what she fell into as she drops from the ceiling. The MPAA whined about the amount of blood and this is why there's such a quick cut from her falling onto the bed and the shot of Rod getting blood splattered on his face.

The only part that got on my nerves about Tina's death is when Freddy first cuts her stomach and she reaches for it, you can see the stomach appliance :laugh: . That and when Freddy jumps out from behind the tree and his glove is on his left hand. Still surprised how many people never notice that :laugh:

Here are some other details that were revealed about the film during the panel:

>Despite the glimpse of how Freddy got his scars in the footage we were shown, the makers of the film emphasized, “This certainly isn’t an origin story. We’re creating our own mythology based on Wes Craven’s story. There’s a little bit of it, but I wouldn’t say we’re bogged down in it.”

>Robert Englund is NOT going to make a cameo in this film, although he does support it.

>One member from the audience remarked that there is a great deal of nudity and weed in these producers’ movies, and asked how much to expect in this film. The response? “This movie has the smallest amount of weed of all of our movies, but there is a little bit of it in there. We try to take a look at what’s important to our story, and we try to maintain a few of those elements, like weed”

>There was a sequence in the footage we were shown that looked like the bedroom scene in the original Nightmare on Elm Street. Despite some similarities, this will not be a remake. According to one of the producers, “I think [Director Samuel Bayer] wanted to tell a different story. Things will be familiar, but I don’t think people will feel like it’s the same story at all.”

>Andrew Clement designed the new Freddy. According to Jackie Earle Haley, “I always felt like if I tried to go out in the world wearing the make-up [without the costume]…I think people would have thought it was real. I think it’s scarier, I think it’s more disconcerting and alarming.”

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!