"Nightmare on Elm Street" Remake


Recommended Posts

I really want to see a Freddy vs Jason 2 one day...maybe Freddy vs Jason vs Ash vs Jigsaw vs Cloverfied vs Uwe Boll

When I saw Freddy vs. Jason I laughed myself crazy. It was hilarious! I did enjoy the movie.

I would like to see the next installment to be like Freddy vs. Jason vs. Michael Myers!

Better yet, Freddy vs. Aliens, or even Predator

Hahahaha

Here's a shot I snapped of Freddy in the trailer.

Not sure what I think. Kind of looks like the potato-lookin mask on Scarecrow (or the Lion from Wizard of Oz lol). And he talks like The Joker. "This won't hurt. One. Little. BIT." I was just waiting on a laugh...

post-108961-1254341134.jpg

I believe they went with a "realistically" burnt look for this go-round. So Freddy will look like his skin was literally burned off and stuff.

And I'm sorry, but everytime I see you know who now, all I can picture is him as a kid in the Bad News Bears movies lol UGH!

maybe Freddy vs Jason vs Ash vs Jigsaw vs Cloverfied vs Uwe Boll

vs Alien vs Predator vs Robocop vs Chucky vs Optimus Prime vs Undertaker vs CM Punk

:p

I'm with those who think this remake is gonna suck. Quite unrelated to this thread, but I just watched a flick called "Trickr Treat" and it was beyond stupid.. in the ending sequence they had this tiny pumpkin alien killer .. I hadn't laughed harder before. I kinda wanted to fill that thing in a bag and slam it across the room like Austin Powers does to Mini Me in "Goldmember" :rofl:

Only thing I'm not liking about it is the voice, but we've only heard a small part of it soo far.

What's really bugging me is the people complaining about the make-up. They've obviously never seen what a real burn victim looks like or they'd know how good a job they did with just these little previews we're seeing. None of the others were really based on how a real burn victim looks. Hell, the original Freddy make-up design was based off what the guy came up with on a pepperoni pizza he was eating. They studied images of burn victims, but didn't really use a whole lot of that. Just little pieces here and there.

I also doubt there will ever be a Freddy Vs. Jason 2. Can't believe people are still waiting for that. Robert Englund has already said he's done with playing Freddy because he feels he's geting too old to play him.

This starts a whole new franchise of films, making a Freddy Vs. Jason 2 right now using Englund and continuing the storyline from the first wouldn't make sense.

Only thing I'm not liking about it is the voice, but we've only heard a small part of it soo far.

What's really bugging me is the people complaining about the make-up. They've obviously never seen what a real burn victim looks like or they'd know how good a job they did with just these little previews we're seeing. None of the others were really based on how a real burn victim looks. Hell, the original Freddy make-up design was based off what the guy came up with on a pepperoni pizza he was eating. They studied images of burn victims, but didn't really use a whole lot of that. Just little pieces here and there.

I also doubt there will ever be a Freddy Vs. Jason 2. Can't believe people are still waiting for that. Robert Englund has already said he's done with playing Freddy because he feels he's geting too old to play him.

This starts a whole new franchise of films, making a Freddy Vs. Jason 2 right now using Englund and continuing the storyline from the first wouldn't make sense.

Freddy is possessed with demons. He isn't supposed to look like the average burn victim....

I don't think people are concerned if the burns look real. Especially not when they are watching a movie about someone who kills people in their dreams. I want Freddy to have that frightening evil look, not something that looks like a combination of Chunk from Goonies and silly putty.

Now let's not bring Demon Freddy from A New Nightmare into this....

Freddy accepted the "dream demons" when he was being burned to death. Forgot what movie showed that, but don't think it was New Nightmare.

Freddy accepted the "dream demons" when he was being burned to death. Forgot what movie showed that, but don't think it was New Nightmare.

Yes I know that micwa. I was joking because the A New Nightmare Freddy really WAS a demon, not just a demon-infested-like Freddy from the other movies. One could say, it really wasn't "our" Freddy so to speak, even though he was :D

And he told his daughter about the dream demons in Nightmare 6 I'm pretty sure. It was towards the end, before he blew up lol

vs Alien vs Predator vs Robocop vs Chucky vs Optimus Prime vs Undertaker vs CM Punk

:p

I'm with those who think this remake is gonna suck. Quite unrelated to this thread, but I just watched a flick called "Trickr Treat" and it was beyond stupid.. in the ending sequence they had this tiny pumpkin alien killer .. I hadn't laughed harder before. I kinda wanted to fill that thing in a bag and slam it across the room like Austin Powers does to Mini Me in "Goldmember" :rofl:

*shocked*

Trick'R'Treat is the best Halloween film ever made...in my eyes of course, it was perfect!

Yes I know that micwa. I was joking because the A New Nightmare Freddy really WAS a demon, not just a demon-infested-like Freddy from the other movies. One could say, it really wasn't "our" Freddy so to speak, even though he was :D

And he told his daughter about the dream demons in Nightmare 6 I'm pretty sure. It was towards the end, before he blew up lol

Oh! Sorry.

New Nightmare really confused me. lol

Yeah it confused quite a few people, which is the main reason most people don't like it I suppose. Still, plent of people (myself included) consider A New Nightmare to be the best Nightmare movie besides the original (though I think ANN is better than ANoES).

Oh I liked the New Nightmare. It was just really confusing... Oh.. there's the actress playing Nancy, and Robert. Oh, hello Wes Cravern. It was different, that's what I liked.

Wes Cravern sure didn't have anything nice to say about this movie.

Freddy is possessed with demons. He isn't supposed to look like the average burn victim....

No he's not

If you're referring to Freddy's Dead, those demons just gave him the power to control the dream world. They didn't possess him. If you're referring to New Nightmare, that wasn't the Freddy of the films. That was a demon that took on the role of Freddy and brought him from the film world into reality. That was all explained by Wes Craven in the film.

He was never actually a true demon of hell because he's constantly stuck in the dream world. That's all he has power over unless he's brought out and taken out of Springwood like he tried in Freddy's Dead.

About this movie as in, this remake or A New Nightmare? lol now I'm confused

As in this remake. I read his remarks about it somewhere.

NightmarE thanks for explaining, it's been a while since I seen 1-6, but I remembered something about demons. Figured it was via being possessed.

I just saw the Nightmare On Elm Street Trailer...I am sorry but, even though the guy looks alright, NO ONE will ever play Freddy Krueger like Robert Englund did....NO ONE. He was and WILL ALWAYS BE Freddy Krueger in my book.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!