NVIDIA to acquire AGEIA


Recommended Posts

US, February 4, 2008 - NVIDIA sent out word today that it has signed an agreement to acquire AGEIA Technologies. The move puts AGEIA's PhysX software, a widely used SDK for gaming phsyics, under NVIDIA's belt. According the press release, more than 140 games that use PhysX are either shipping or in development for PS3, Xbox 360, Wii and PC. The acquisition will allow NVIDIA to introduce an integrated GPU and physics card into the market, giving them a leg up on the competition.

"The AGEIA team is world class, and is passionate about the same thing we are?creating the most amazing and captivating game experiences," stated Jen-Hsun Huang, president and CEO of NVIDIA. "By combining the teams that created the world's most pervasive GPU and physics engine brands, we can now bring GeForce?-accelerated PhysX to hundreds of millions of gamers around the world."

[SOURCE]

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/617853-nvidia-to-acquire-ageia/
Share on other sites

Try getting a core of a CPU to do what a GPU does... Instead, a PPU works like a GPU works, they are finely tuned to their tasks. Throwing both GPU and a PPU on a card will re-define what the card is... instead of Graphics Processing Unit, it could be Game Processing Unit. :p

Great, PhysX libairies where starting to well be in use, and now, Nvidia cards will have it.

I'm not sure if nvidia will keep producing PPU cards, I bet they will make SLI Physic finally a reality.

Hell, they could possibly add the PPU chip to the PCB board of the graphics card or build it straight into a single chip, who knows with NVIDIA.

i still think PPU are useless, just get a core of a cpu to do it...

The same arguement could be made for not having Video cards at all and getting the CPU to do the processing. In practice processors that are dedicated to a sole task and optimised to perform it will perform alot better than a general processor designed for a multitude of different task.

Hell, they could possibly add the PPU chip to the PCB board of the graphics card or build it straight into a single chip, who knows with NVIDIA.
Probably useless, well I hope they wont, since GPUs can almost do CPU stuff now (IE: Folding@Home) with GPGPU stuff, I think it's already not so hard to tweak the Ageia Physic driver to use the GPU to do the thing other than the PPU.

We all know that the nice thing with Ageia PhysX API, is that it work also on X86 CPUs.

Anyway, with the GT200 (Next GPU after the G100/D9E) having a rumored 250W TDP, it's not the time to put another little chip with a TDP of 30W on it lol. I REALLY doubt it's possible to cool 280W (+ RAM) on a Dual Slot Air cooler :s)

Edit: Here the nVidia CUDA thing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA

Basically, I see it as running C code on the GPU...

Whatever, I may be a big Hardware fan, but all that API stuff is out pacing me :s

GeForce accelerated PhysX? Interesting. I wonder how AMD-ATi will react.
They probably won't react.

Unless Nvidia combines both the physics chip and the geforce gpu's on a single card, and eventually they will, ATI/AMD will sit where they are. How many people care about the physics card, seriously out there how many games make use of this? And are the benefits worth the purchase? If Nvidia pushes this by putting its features into upcoming Geforces, that could change a thing or two but as long as its is own seperate card, it won't do squat.

Unless Nvidia combines both the physics chip and the geforce gpu's on a single card, and eventually they will, ATI/AMD will sit where they are. How many people care about the physics card, seriously out there how many games make use of this?
Your right when you say noone really cares but NVidia aren't stupid either and probably realise theres not a huge market for these cards as individual items so I'd really expect them to be pushing for the integration into their graphics cards in the future. I doubt NVidia bought them with the intention of selling millions of stand alone cards.
Intel has Havok (and HavokFX, which runs on the GPU) and now Nvidia have AGEIA, I wonder if ATI will follow suit.
NVidia may possibly license out the technology which would benefit them and possibly ATI by having a uniform standard between the two manufacturers for programers to program to, making the cards more likely to be utilised.

Yeah, a unified way to access it is really going to benefit adoption.

ATI and Nvidia do work together on making things work, if they both care about Physics (they have both stated that) then they'll hopefully work on it (and hopefully Intel will join the party if they do)

If they do all chose a method, I'm hoping they document how to do it, not every physics library is closed source.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!