Net users face web ban for illegal downloads


Recommended Posts

Web users who illegally download films and music could be cut off from the internet by their service providers under proposals which are set to be unveiled next week.

The Government wants to force internet service providers (ISPs) to clamp down on the six million people who access pirated material every year as companies are claiming the practice costs them billions of pounds in revenue, it was reported.

Internet users who illegally download music or films will receive an email warning for a first offence, face a suspension for a second offence and have their internet contract terminated for the third offence.

The proposal comes from a Green Paper on the creative industries called The World's Creative Hub, which is due to be unveiled by Culture Secretary Andy Burnham and Gordon Brown next week.

According to the paper the government will 'move to legislate to require internet service provider to take action on illegal file-sharing'.

A consultation document on the proposal is expected to be issued within coming months.

Britain's four biggest internet providers - BT, Virgin Media, Tiscali and Orange - have been in talks with music companies and film distributors and studios about a voluntary code.

One of the disputed points is the problem of 'wifi piggy-backing' - the practice in which someone accesses the internet using another person's wifi network.

But Roz Groome, vice-president of anti-piracy for NBC Universal, welcomed the prospect of legislation.

'We welcome the signal from Government that it values the health of the creative industries and takes seriously the damage caused by widespread online copyright infringement,' she said.

'We call upon ISPs to take action now.'

A spokesman for the Internet Service Providers Association said he hoped a voluntary arrangement would be preferable to legislation.

'Every right thinking body knows that self-regulation is much the better option in these areas,' he told The Times.

And Ed Vaizey, the Conservative's Shadow Arts Minister, said: 'David Cameron called on the internet providers to address this issue last summer.

'The credibility of the Government's latest threat is underminded by the fact that ministers have spent so many years dithering on whether to legislate.'

Source

It's not law yet just being brought up and this part should be highlighted in the article, "proposals which are set to be unveiled next week". Hopefully for people in England this won't pass or else your becoming like the US of A ;)

I doubt the ISPs are going to want to cut off about 50% of their user-base. Also, if they cut someone off, what's to stop them just going straight to a different ISP? There's about 1000 of them in the UK.

Sounds a bit stupid, I *need* internet access every day for work so say if the other guys/girls in my flat were to get caught downloading I lose my job... good job government :huh:

On the flip side, they're trying to prevent theft, the component driving this suggestion. Theft, not someone downloading copies and copies of free software, but downloading an illegal copy of a file that is simply not theirs to own. On the surface this is a fair action, but in the end I don't see this passing. Still though, if half the people on Comcast in Houston were shut off, I'd have much more bandwidth for my TF2 fragging and web streaming TV shows....

Well, that would imply ISPs constantly monitoring your traffic, to see what you download and upload... based on what? Name of the files? Who's going to monitor all that data? Software?

Also, I'm aware that everything I do on the internet can be monitered, but I also know that practically speaking no one really gives a damn except if I engage in mass distribution of movies, etc., and that gives me a comfortable feeling known as privacy.

lol I've had a brain wave!

I'll download the first 80GB of the internet and everyone else can download as much as they can! and if we work together we can do this!!!

I've already started, I'm starting with the pr0n websites... don't want it all to go to waste

It shouldn't be up to the ISP's to enforce the law, if the police care about it so much, they should setup their own unit to investigate file sharers (and if it's illegal, the police should file some charges, stop letting the record companies be the law).

Which is why I live in Canada. United States is a country that can have you arrested for farting in your bathtub in Arizona.

Good to know.

The article is about the UK though, you know that, right?

It's not law yet just being brought up and this part should be highlighted in the article, "proposals which are set to be unveiled next week". Hopefully for people in England this won't pass or else your becoming like the US of A ;)

What do you mean by that? I'm pretty sure most ISPs in the USA don't just kick off users for suspicion of accessing pirated material. Like stated earlier, if you think the ISPs will willingly cut off revenue generating consumers, you're crazy.

Which is why I live in Canada. United States is a country that can have you arrested for farting in your bathtub in Arizona.

How typical... Stupid anti-American rants coming from immature little Canadians. :(

I thought uploading copyrighted content was illegal too.

All illegal downloads begin with an illegal upload, no?

Why target the downloaders?

Oh well, I'm a stupid American. What do I know?

Well, other than this whole Internet thing was Al Gore's idea.

... or rather he said he took the initiative in creating it.

If it was possible to track the whole of the UK for downloading this content, the RIAA and MPAA would already be doing it and taking everyone to court. THe amount it would cost to upgrade every ISP with equipment, software and manpower in order to pull it off would run into Billions, none of which could be recouped (in fact, money would be lost as less people would pay for the service).

This wont take off at all, so I wouldn't worry about it. A more likely scenario is they'll force ISP's to block websites that distribute this content and that would go down like a lead balloon.

Which is why I live in Canada. United States is a country that can have you arrested for farting in your bathtub in Arizona.

You live in Canada, because you were born there. (about 8 years ago by all accounts)

Will using encryption do anything to protect our privacy? What lengths are they going to stoop to?

You live in Canada, because you were born there. (about 8 years ago by all accounts)

Will using encryption do anything to protect our privacy? What lengths are they going to stoop to?

Encryption is one way to protect yourself, the likes of Tor is another (Assuming the Government doesn't create a bunch of Tor nodes themselves). Not to mention there are programs like Privoxy that actively block government IP's and anyone else who you don't want tracking you.

EDIT: The point is, there will always be people out there working to stay one step ahead of the likes of the people that would like to track us all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • whoosh my comment went over your head. Enjoy your notchless 3:2 OLED device
    • As a game dev, today was really depressing. They announced that Blueprints will be deprecated in UE6 to be fully replaced by their sh**ty Python-like Verse language... They also announced that 5.8 will be the last version of UE5 until UE6 comes out in MID 2029!!!! They have completely lost the plot.
    • Prime Early Deal: Amazon Echo Dot Max drops to its lowest price ever by Fiza Ali While Prime Day 2026 is officially kicking off next week, Amazon has started offering Prime Early Deals already. Particularly, the newest model of Amazon Echo Dot Max, unveiled in September 2025, is now selling at its lowest price yet with a 35% discount on its original MSRP. The device features a two-way mono speaker system comprising a 0.8-inch tweeter and a 2.5-inch woofer that should deliver sound across a claimed frequency range of 53Hz to 16kHz. It offers Wi-Fi 6E support (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) alongside Bluetooth 5.3 with Low Energy, including A2DP for audio playback and AVRCP for device control. The device also operates as a smart home hub, with built-in support for Zigbee, Matter, and Thread Border Router functionality. Furthermore, Amazon Sidewalk is included to help extend connectivity beyond standard Wi-Fi range by leveraging shared network infrastructure. Under the hood, it is powered by the AZ3 processor with an integrated AI accelerator. It also features Omnisense technology, enabling ambient intelligence capabilities such as presence detection, temperature monitoring, and tap gesture control. There are also additional built-in sensors that include ambient light, temperature, and an accelerometer. When paired with a compatible eero router, it can also help extend Wi-Fi coverage by up to 1,000 square feet, supporting speeds of up to 100Mbps and up to 10 devices on the 5GHz band. Setup is handled via the Alexa app, available on Android, iOS, Fire OS, and web browsers. In terms of privacy, it includes a microphone mute button, wake word activation, and options to review and delete voice recordings. Accessibility features cover adaptive listening, adjustable speech rate, audible request tones, and read-aloud support. Lastly, the device is backed by a one-year limited warranty, with optional extended protection available as well. Amazon Echo Dot Max (newest model): $64.99 (Amazon US) - 35% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • That's not what I meant:) I like the tabs being above the URL bar, but previously the tab selection started from the top of the screen (y=0). So I could just quickly push my mouse up and done. Now I have to actually aim it just slightly below the top, because the tab is now a few pixels below the top. In other words, previously I only had to aim with my mouse horizontally, now I have to both vertically and horizontally. Super annoying.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      160
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!