Reuters: Toshiba to exit HD DVD, end format war


Recommended Posts

What about Microsoft, which is behind the HD-DVD? mmm thats a total loss...

I don't think Microsoft had much of a stake in HD DVD to be honest and I wouldn't be surprised if they have a stake in Blu-ray as well. And remember they have their competing HD download service.

By the way, there are several reasons that HD DVD was better, but I won't go into them here. As usual marketing prevails, Sony got their consumers to do exactly what they wanted them to. If consumers had a collective brain, Sony wouldn't even exist.

But I do not get why people feel so excited over one HD Format over the other. I'm glad for once (just once? LOL) Microsoft has been on the wrong side of technology success. They're getting their tentacles into too many technologies.

Consider the same reasons you get excited for MS failing? (sans-lol)

I'm not exaclty sure where you get the idea MS is on the "wrong side of tech sucess" (anti-MS hater maybe)?

MS hasn't failed here, Toshiba and the other hardware members of the HD-DVD consortium failed. MS can still continue on with success as their software is adaptable. The HD-DVD hardware on the other hand is not.

Too bad this article isn't from Toshiba themselves.

Thus its not confirmed, love how everyone is celebrating.

Until Toshiba says so, its just more speculation.

Considering this is like the 5th source saying the same thing... I highly doubt it's not true.

Sorry that you bought an HD-DVD player... but its time to move on...

This is a question for those who say 'I don't like Blu-Ray.... etc', can someone explain why it is that you don't like Blu-Ray? Or is this an 'Sony is evil' thing? I'm confused.
HD-DVD was pretty much a finished, proven technology where Blu-Ray is still expensive to produce and is going through upgrades and changes constantly (unless Im falling behind the times, I might be wrong here).

Even so, Blu-Ray is a more expensive format, simply because it uses a different technology to run its disks. This means you need another laser inside to read a normal DVD, upping the price even more. Not to mention it reads slower than current DVD's, which to me makes no sense at all. Why have so much more content if it takes four times longer to get to that content?

But that is all in the past seeing as HD-DVD has thrown in the towel :|

But I do not get why people feel so excited over one HD Format over the other. I'm glad for once (just once? LOL) Microsoft has been on the wrong side of technology success. They're getting their tentacles into too many technologies.

For me it was the region free aspect and the fact that the spec seemed more thought out from day one as opposed to this profile debacle we have on the BluRay side where new profiles are preventing older players making full use of a disks features. But I'm not upset either, I sat on the fence and I'm happy that one format has won. Wasn't HD-DVD but meh, it's still a better outcome than what we've had the past 18 months.

MS hasn't failed here, Toshiba and the other hardware members of the HD-DVD consortium failed. MS can still continue on with success as their software is adaptable. The HD-DVD hardware on the other hand is not.

Exactly. Wasn't HDi designed to be platform-independent in the first place (meaning it was only HD-DVD exclusive because of an agreement)? There's no technical reason a new BD profile can't come along to add HDi to BluRay.

Lets be honest here it's a much better solution than having a Java programmer on hand just to write a menu, when HDi can do it with a simple script.

It all depends on if the BDA wants to add it or not.

I'm happy there's finally a winner but then again...

Blu-Ray hardware is shi*ty. Samsung is being sued for faulty players. Most players out there are only profile 1.0 while only the newest players support 2.0 which adds features all HD-DVD player have. Blu-Ray seem to cost more. Blu-Ray in general cost more.... not happy HD-DVD went down this fast.

I've been a supporter of both formats for a while, with multiple players for each. currently 72hddvds/63blu in my collection.

As an early adopter I will continue to enjoy my hd-dvds, and will be buying more through ebay and sales. Plus the toshiba players are excellent at upscaling the hundreds of DVD's I have.

More of my future purchases will inevitably be bluray as hd-dvds are phased out.

All in all, I will still enjoy HD media regardless of format. (I just hope blu hardware improves soon, at better prices)

Edited by WolfDV
This is a question for those who say 'I don't like Blu-Ray.... etc', can someone explain why it is that you don't like Blu-Ray? Or is this an 'Sony is evil' thing? I'm confused.

I'm going to quote IGN's recent feature on HDDVD, as this explains my preference better than I could do myself. Although i'm a recent HD to Blu convert, experience wise it certainly seems like a downgrade, and I would much prefer to be watching HD.

In terms of user experience and value, HD-DVD also was a generally better option for much of its run. Blu-ray had something of an advantage in that all hardware could output 1080p, as opposed to low and mid-range HD-DVD players maxing out at 1080i. However, quality de-interlacing circuitry in modern HDTVs ameliorated this shortcoming in large part, and HD-DVD's advantage in interactive content support was actually much more significant. The Microsoft developed HDi interactive layer for HD-DVDs was ready early in the format's life, and allowed for a consistent development environment for interactive games, picture-in-picture extra features and commentaries, and web-enabled content. Blu-ray's BDJava, on the other hand, has remained both un-finalized and more difficult to use. The release of 300 on the formats threw this point into stark contrast, as the HD-DVD version offers a full range of next-generation extra features, and the Blu-ray none.

The HD-DVD camp also avoided major hardware standard alterations. First generation models all included Ethernet inputs for firmware upgrades, and as such should still be able to play any HD-DVD. Blu-ray, on the other hand, has cycled through a number of non-final hardware profiles, the earliest of which will not be able to upgrade to the final profile, as the hardware lacks both Ethernet ports for firmware upgrades and internal storage necessary for web-enabled content. Consequently, early Blu-ray adopters will eventual be disenfranchised, meaning Blu-ray will have broken a cardinal rule of consumer electronics: don't obsolete early hardware.

IGN

Most Blu-Ray fans will tell you that "Interactive content" means nothing, it's not worth it and when you buy/rent a movie, it's only to watch the movie.

And future BD movies are "supposed" to play on Profile 1.0 player, they will only miss the interactive content, and, since it's worthless, no problem there!

-----

With HDi, you really had the feeling of playing something from a next generation. The menu, interactivity, PiP, Web content, games.... All very well done. Amazing.

Blu-Ray movies, as of now, it's simply an upgrade of DVD to Hi-Def. Nothing more. It did not help that the first bunch of BD movies where out using MPEG2 on 25Gb disc. They really did not look like Hi-Def movies, grainy and not very sharp.

Most Blu-Ray fans will tell you that "Interactive content" means nothing, it's not worth it and when you buy/rent a movie, it's only to watch the movie.

And future BD movies are "supposed" to play on Profile 1.0 player, they will only miss the interactive content, and, since it's worthless, no problem there!

-----

With HDi, you really had the feeling of playing something from a next generation. The menu, interactivity, PiP, Web content, games.... All very well done. Amazing.

Blu-Ray movies, as of now, it's simply an upgrade of DVD to Hi-Def. Nothing more. It did not help that the first bunch of BD movies where out using MPEG2 on 25Gb disc. They really did not look like Hi-Def movies, grainy and not very sharp.

We are past that "first batch" ... that was then - this is now. For what it's worth, as time goes on and the tech behind Blu-ray advances it seems that some of those bitter folks will still hang onto the past. Let it go - we really should be discussing now how this technology and media (Blu-ray) can be enhanced and tweaked to perfection so that everybody can enjoy it to the fullest extent.

bluray IS a downgrade, the ONLY thing bluray had better was 50gb instead of 30gb, but the triple layer 51gb remove the only thing better bluray had, its a shame, now we have to have region coded bluray discs with bd+ which are also more expensive the hd-dvd discs and players are alot more and profile 2.0 isnt even out yet, bluray is half-baked STILL, but those pay-offs to movie companies won them the war:( shame so many people will do anything for money.

Lets hope toshiba create some bluray players that are much cheaper than sony's.

I blame HD-DVD camp for this loss. They should have advertised. they had the opportunity to win, but they counted their chickens before they hatched.

Stop whining. There is nothing you can do, and you just have to accept the fact that HD-DVD is not longer around. Stop wallowing in the past.

We are past that "first batch" ... that was then - this is now. For what it's worth, as time goes on and the tech behind Blu-ray advances it seems that some of those bitter folks will still hang onto the past. Let it go - we really should be discussing now how this technology and media (Blu-ray) can be enhanced and tweaked to perfection so that everybody can enjoy it to the fullest extent.

Blu-Ray needs HDi and final hardware specification now. Microsoft would be happy to make money and sell it to the Blu camp. The BD-Java thing seems to be crap/hard to implement.

I did say "first bunch" when talking about Blu movies. By the way, I own a PS3 and lots of movies, on both Blu and HD-DVD. I can make my own judgment on the picture quality.

bluray IS a downgrade, the ONLY thing bluray had better was 50gb instead of 30gb, but the triple layer 51gb remove the only thing better bluray had, its a shame, now we have to have region coded bluray discs with bd+ which are also more expensive the hd-dvd discs and players are alot more and profile 2.0 isnt even out yet, bluray is half-baked STILL, but those pay-offs to movie companies won them the war:( shame so many people will do anything for money.

Lets hope toshiba create some bluray players that are much cheaper than sony's.

They probably will - so what? It's better for you in the end... isn't it? Some people will never pass up a chance to take a jab at Sony. Never fails. We know your reasons... but it seems so repetitive anymore. Again, I think we ought to discuss what other developers can do now with Blu-ray to clean up the hardware and profiles to get the ball really rolling.

Blu-Ray needs HDi and final hardware specification now. Microsoft would be happy to make money and sell it to the Blu camp. The BD-Java thing seems to be crap/hard to implement.

I did say "first bunch" when talking about Blu movies. By the way, I own a PS3 and lots of movies, on both Blu and HD-DVD. I can make my own judgment on the picture quality.

As can the rest of us - my picture quality looks great. I'm not sure what connections and/or television set you're using - or settings for that matter - but still, it makes me wonder.

If MS wants to sell off that tech, then so be it. Anything to help Blu-ray become a fine tuned piece of media won't hurt anybody. :p

a big loss to toshiba, consumers in general and microsoft.

playstation 3 sacrifice his leader marketshare from previous generation to push blu ray and this will eventually and potentially bring back his leadership in HD and gaming area, Now that HD-DVD fail microsoft lose a lot, digital distribution it will take longer to take off, at least in High quality content that eat a lot of space besides not everyone have a high speed broadband. Microsoft do not include a bigger hard drive with their 360.

Consumers will buy the most expensive format and expensive players (like a ps3), most will stick with DVD, the only good thing would be a single format and less confusion.

Microsoft HDi will fail against BD-J, xbox360 eventually fail behind the ps3 as it happened in january npd sales, so sony did planned well this blu ray will help them dominate the world.

a big loss to toshiba, consumers in general and microsoft.

playstation 3 sacrifice his leader marketshare from previous generation to push blu ray and this will eventually and potentially bring back his leadership in HD and gaming area, Now that HD-DVD fail microsoft lose a lot, digital distribution it will take longer to take off, at least in High quality content that eat a lot of space besides not everyone have a high speed broadband. Microsoft do not include a bigger hard drive with their 360.

Consumers will buy the most expensive format and expensive players (like a ps3), most will stick with DVD, the only good thing would be a single format and less confusion.

Microsoft HDi will fail against BD-J, xbox360 eventually fail behind the ps3 as it happened in january npd sales, so sony did planned well this blu ray will help them dominate the world.

Oh no! The commies are coming... the commies are coming! The world is going to end... ahhh! Sony! ahhh!

Heh... sounds like a certain forum - doesn't it? :laugh:

As can the rest of us - my picture quality looks great. I'm not sure what connections and/or television set you're using - or settings for that matter - but still, it makes me wonder.

Well, I have 2 1080p HDTV, one Sony SXRD 50" and the other is a Sharp 46" LCD. Both calibrated using help from AVS Forum and using DVE. All connections are HDMI. Are you still wondering?

And let me say it again : First batch of BD movies. I did not say ALL BD movies. And I'm not the first one saying that HD-DVD movies had better picture quality, using VC-1 from the start.

Anyway, Blu won, now they need to catch-up with HD-DVD. Finalize the spec, push that Profile 2.0 already and do something good with the BD-J thing or buy HDi.

This is the most ridiculous statement I've heard in a while. I dont know where you get your facts from but Microsoft does not care that much about the HD DVD format, that is why they never made games on that media. Toshiba was basically paying them to offer their format as alternative HD media. They can easily switch to BluRay as they did to HD DVD. That is why they kept the HD DVD player as a external standalone player.

Blu Ray winning the format war will in no way effect the game sales of the Xbox 360.

a big loss to toshiba, consumers in general and microsoft.

playstation 3 sacrifice his leader marketshare from previous generation to push blu ray and this will eventually and potentially bring back his leadership in HD and gaming area, Now that HD-DVD fail microsoft lose a lot, digital distribution it will take longer to take off, at least in High quality content that eat a lot of space besides not everyone have a high speed broadband. Microsoft do not include a bigger hard drive with their 360.

Consumers will buy the most expensive format and expensive players (like a ps3), most will stick with DVD, the only good thing would be a single format and less confusion.

Microsoft HDi will fail against BD-J, xbox360 eventually fail behind the ps3 as it happened in january npd sales, so sony did planned well this blu ray will help them dominate the world.

Well, I have 2 1080p HDTV, one Sony SXRD 50" and the other is a Sharp 46" LCD. Both calibrated using help from AVS Forum and using DVE. All connections are HDMI. Are you still wondering?

And let me say it again : First batch of BD movies. I did not say ALL BD movies. And I'm not the first one saying that HD-DVD movies had better picture quality, using VC-1 from the start.

Anyway, Blu won, now they need to catch-up with HD-DVD. Finalize the spec, push that Profile 2.0 already and do something good with the BD-J thing or buy HDi.

Yes - I still am wondering. And?

And with all forces gearing up behind their back, I'm sure the Blu camp won't have too much trouble "catching up" with the other "far superior features" that HD-DVD had offered. Development will now be pushed quite fast - I have no doubts on this. Even for the bickering about the assumed issues Blu-ray has been having (unfinalized spec and hardware) you have to admit that still didn't keep the sales from blasting the HD competition out of the water. Guess it's not too much of an issue. ;)

the ONLY thing bluray had better was 50gb instead of 30gb

Wrong. It has a higher max data read speed than HD-DVD ever did allowing for higher bitrate's. Also it has the enforced anti scratch protection on every disk that made it very attractive for rental markets.

HD-DVD TL51 was nothing more than vapourware, it kept getting constantly mentioned during the format war but it never materialised. I really doubt it ever will now.

but those pay-offs to movie companies won them the war:

grr. The HD-DVD group did this as well, see paramount. It's business and its the way things work. Console companies have been doing it with game studio's for years.

Lets hope toshiba create some bluray players that are much cheaper than sony's.

I doubt they will at least straight off. One of the reasons for them apparently pulling out of the HD-DVD market is because they can no longer afford to subsidise the players the way they have been with no benefit. I can see them releasing the first profile 2.0 player tho, just to spite the BDA.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!