Recommended Posts

Forgot to say that Botchamania ending is in a separate video now. Favourited. :)

I'm watching this week's SmackDown! now and they brought up the triple threat main event from last week, and I just remembered that I forgot to say something on here after last week's SmackDown!...

Randy Orton came in and RKO'd Mark Henry with the referee seeing it clear as day and just telling off Randy, meanwhile Cole says, "Remember, there's no disqualification in a triple threat match!"

SINCE WHEN WAS A TRIPLE THREAT MATCH ALSO NO F**KING DQ?!?!?! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is currently in talks with Paramount to appear in the new G.I. Joe sequel, reports DeadlineHollywood.com. Johnson is discussing a role as Roadblock, who made an appearance in the first movie. Interestingly, former WWE superstar, Shad Gaspard auditioned for the movie as well.

Bret Hart announced that he'll be working WWE's upcoming tour of South Africa.

So, the good bits of RAW this week...

Stone Cold (and John Cena) kicking the everloving crap out of Michael Cole. :)

Someone saying "b*stard" for the second week in a row on the show (Stone Cold this time)! :D

And the COBRA!!!!!! :woot:

Rosa Mendes suffered a wardrobe malfunction during a dark match against Natalya at last night's SmackDown! taping in Roanoke, Virgina.

The match ended abruptly with the referee calling for the bell and giving the victory to Natalya. Mendes covered her chest with her arms and quickly headed to the back while numerous male onlookers cheered at ringside. Natalya attempted to keep the focus away from Mendes as she acted overly excited about the win.

The Roanoke Civic Center staff were overheard saying Mendes had suffered a "wardrobe malfunction."

Mendes commented on the matter on her Twitter account, writing: "A wardrobe malfunction that everyone wanted to see tonight."

After speaking with sources I have learned the early plans as of now for next years WrestleMania 28 card.

Obviously The Rock vs John Cena and the plan is to have the WWE title be on the line in that match.

The Undertaker vs Chris Jericho would also be on the card. A rematch between Triple H and The Undertaker is rumored to take place at this years SummerSlam.

Triple H would go to WrestleMania next year going up against The Miz.

Alberto Del Rio vs Randy Orton.

Sin Cara vs Rey Mysterio.

And the celebrity involvement that the WWE is hoping for is Big Show in a match against retired NBA star Shaq.

These plans are all subject to change between now the start of 2012 based on injuries and other factors. As of now, this is the card that the WWE is looking to have for WrestleMania 28 in Miami.

Follow Justin LaBar on Twitter

Whoever that guy is, just wrong wrong wrong.

Cena vs Rock will not be for a title. Period. Match is going to draw the same number no matter what. Putting the title on Cena doesn't help the buy rate at all. And The Rock will not win the title, so you'd know it would be a Cena victory (since a Cena DQ would not please anyone.) Put the title on someone else for the 'Road to Wrestlemania', and let that match draw some attention and PPV buys.

They don't know if UT will EVER wrestle again, let alone at SS in three months. He wouldn't have had Michelle leave the WWE if he was going to be back soon. So that throws out the UT/HHH match at SS.

Hunter has a lot more responsibilities now then he ever did. He's being groomed to take over for Vince. He might never wrestle again, either. And Jericho said recently that he has so many opportunities that he doesn't know when he'll be back.

ADR vs RKO - they aren't currently on the same show. They aren't going to move Orton off Smackdown. Hes the headliner of that show now. So Del Rio back to SD? Doubtful.

Sin Cara vs Mysterio - yeah, probably. Rey is going to retire sometime soon, so they'll want to have that match to put Sin Cara over before that happens, and at a major PPV. Again, they are on opposite shows, so something has to give there.

Show vs Shaq - I could see that happening, except for one thing - its in Miami. Unless they make Shaq the heel (has that ever been done with a celeb besides Tyson?), that won't go over well in Miami. There are plenty of celebs that would go over huge at WM in Miami. Shaq isn't one of them.

Whoever that guy is, just wrong wrong wrong.

Cena vs Rock will not be for a title. Period. Match is going to draw the same number no matter what. Putting the title on Cena doesn't help the buy rate at all. And The Rock will not win the title, so you'd know it would be a Cena victory (since a Cena DQ would not please anyone.) Put the title on someone else for the 'Road to Wrestlemania', and let that match draw some attention and PPV buys.

They don't know if UT will EVER wrestle again, let alone at SS in three months. He wouldn't have had Michelle leave the WWE if he was going to be back soon. So that throws out the UT/HHH match at SS.

Hunter has a lot more responsibilities now then he ever did. He's being groomed to take over for Vince. He might never wrestle again, either. And Jericho said recently that he has so many opportunities that he doesn't know when he'll be back.

ADR vs RKO - they aren't currently on the same show. They aren't going to move Orton off Smackdown. Hes the headliner of that show now. So Del Rio back to SD? Doubtful.

Sin Cara vs Mysterio - yeah, probably. Rey is going to retire sometime soon, so they'll want to have that match to put Sin Cara over before that happens, and at a major PPV. Again, they are on opposite shows, so something has to give there.

Show vs Shaq - I could see that happening, except for one thing - its in Miami. Unless they make Shaq the heel (has that ever been done with a celeb besides Tyson?), that won't go over well in Miami. There are plenty of celebs that would go over huge at WM in Miami. Shaq isn't one of them.

I doubt the fact that 2 "superstars" are on separate shows matters for WrestleMania as the big one always has cross brand match ups. Usually the tension is built up from the Royal Rumble.

I agree that The Undertaker probably won't return until WM and that will probably be his swansong. I think they will pull out the stops for that one and put him in with someone bigger than Jericho.

Sin Cara vs Mysterio could be a show stealer if they get it done properly!

I doubt the fact that 2 "superstars" are on separate shows matters for WrestleMania as the big one always has cross brand match ups. Usually the tension is built up from the Royal Rumble.

I agree that The Undertaker probably won't return until WM and that will probably be his swansong. I think they will pull out the stops for that one and put him in with someone bigger than Jericho.

Sin Cara vs Mysterio could be a show stealer if they get it done properly!

Uh, what cross brand match ups have we had at WrestleMania, besides none? Yes, the Rumble winner can choose to go after the the other title, but besides that ...

Mysterio sucks, and Sin Cara isn't as great as they build him up to be. I have no interest in that match.

Cena is injured so Truth to win strap?

What?! Please let that be true! :woot:

BTW, apologies for not knowing that Triple Threat matches have always been no-DQ. I always thought they were the same as normal matches? I swear I've never seen anything DQ-worthy happen in a Triple Threat match before. :pinch:

What?! Please let that be true! :woot:

BTW, apologies for not knowing that Triple Threat matches have always been no-DQ. I always thought they were the same as normal matches? I swear I've never seen anything DQ-worthy happen in a Triple Threat match before. :pinch:

yep

Current WWE Champion John Cena is working through a number of injuries these days. Sources indicate that Cena has neck, hip, and elbow problems that have been bugging him for awhile now. It should be noted that despite these nagging injuries, Cena is rarely one to complain.

yep

Current WWE Champion John Cena is working through a number of injuries these days. Sources indicate that Cena has neck, hip, and elbow problems that have been bugging him for awhile now. It should be noted that despite these nagging injuries, Cena is rarely one to complain.

Let's pray

he loses the title to R-Truth at Capitol Punishment then!

:)

If he wins though, he's really got to get a proper entrance again. Imagine the WWE Champion's entrance: "THE TRUTH!!! Shall set you free!" *no music* Bit of a disaster.

:p

I LOVE the no music entrance. Its awesome. R-Truth winning would be unbelievable. He'd be the first ever black WWE Champion.

Yeah, I like it too. It's different. :)

And technically, The Rock was the first ever black WWE Champion. Remember that storyline when Rikishi ran over Stone Cold, he said that he did it to get black wrestlers in the spotlight, which is what happened when The Rock became champion.

As for the first black world champion ever, that honour goes to Ron "DAMN!" Simmons. :)

Yeah, I like it too. It's different. :)

And technically, The Rock was the first ever black WWE Champion. Remember that storyline when Rikishi ran over Stone Cold, he said that he did it to get black wrestlers in the spotlight, which is what happened when The Rock became champion.

As for the first black world champion ever, that honour goes to Ron "DAMN!" Simmons. :)

The Rock isn't black. He's Samoan.

Yeah, but wasn't Rikishi referring to black wrestlers in general, and he just included The Rock and his father and grandfather?

No idea. If he's storyline 'black' thats one thing (I guess he was, being in the Nation and all). But in reality, there have been no black WWE Champions. A few in WCW, and many have held lesser titles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WWE_Champions

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

    • earlcaulley
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!