Recommended Posts

I don't have a problem with Rey really, but I also don't want to see another title run for him at this point in his career. Everyone complains about Cena and the 5 moves of doom etc with him. Rey has been doing the SAME match for like, a decade now if not more. I mean of course he's more agile and not a "big" wrestler but come on already. I know he's popular with the kids but really. I don't mind him in the main event picture, but please no title.

Agree with you about Rey being like Cena here, although at least he loses clean fairly often and he sells moves more. I think the reason why he doesn't get a much stick as Cena is because he's not constantly in the title picture but yeah, i've found him boring for a while and i think other people also feel the same seeing as he was also booed at points during MITB.

Agree with you about Rey being like Cena here, although at least he loses clean fairly often and he sells moves more. I think the reason why he doesn't get a much stick as Cena is because he's not constantly in the title picture but yeah, i've found him boring for a while and i think other people also feel the same seeing as he was also booed at points during MITB.

That was a heel crowd. Can't go by anything they did. Miz got a ridiculous ovation when he ran back out.

Punk is clearly part of a bigger WWE/ROH angle... Vince will play a role such as the deposed head of WWE seeking revenge.

Let's face it, WWE has clearly flirted with the "independant/alternative" circuit since HHH has become a louder voice within the company (Shamus, Mystico, CM Punk, Daniel Bryan were all given his support). Colt Cabana even appearing on a WWE show speaks absolute volumes.

And let's not forget that Dana White was at WWE HQ the other day (though as a tourist more than likely, but still) so who knows what's going to happen down the road here. Could be really interesting. I just hope WWE doesn't drop the ball like they've done sooooo many times with these types of angles in the past.

"Record Luchas" recently interviewed newly suspended WWE Smackdown star Sin Cara, and the lucha libre star had the following to say:"Thanks for the support everyone's giving me. I know I'm not a drug addict, much less putting stuff in my body. I don't know what could've happen. Apparently it was the medication. We're going to wait to see what happens, because I don't have a big body to be using steroids. If it had been for drugs, they would have fired me.

Tomorrow they told me we would be meeting. This affects me, but the WWE hasn't told me anything bad. What happened is I had a pain in my knee and they injected something into me. That's what must have tested positive. Supposedly it was a steroid. A lot of medications have something them that make the testing come out positive.

These are injections we normally use in Mexico. The pain has been in my knee and it's the same knee that's been giving me problems. That's what made it positive. In Mexico I was told if they did a thorough testing it would test positive, but it's nothing else bad.

Because of the company policy there has to be a penalty. I found out that I would be having a meeting with WWE tomorrow. They told me not to worry it won't affect me and nothing will happen and that's what I wanted to know. Tomorrow we will talk and we'll know what happens." To read the rest of the article, be sure to click on the above link.

I kinda thought it might be something like that with Sin Cara. He obviously isn't on steroids (at least, not the ones that make you HHH big lol) and I did know about his knee problems in Mexico so, yeah. WWE had to do it, but still.

CM Punk Crashes WWE Panel, Confronts Triple H!

This afternoon, with yours truly present, CM Punk crashed the the joint Mattel/WWE panel ? WWE: Past, Present and Future ? at San Diego Comic-Con, featuring WWE superstars Triple H, Rey Mysterio and the legendary Bret Hart.

Punk announced himself via bullhorn and then, with WWE Title in hand, took to the designated question-asking mic and began to awesomely speechify! Punk took exception to the fact that they were trying to crown a new champ on RAW and then challenged Rey, or anyone else who wanted to be champ, to head out to Chicago to take him on.

Punk then also asked Triple H and RAW writer Brain Gewirtz why Zack Ryder wasn't on TV. Triple H, in what seemed to be a part of a storyline, told Punk that things had changed on RAW and that there was a new regime. He told Punk to give him a call. Punk responded by telling Hunter that he was sure Stephanie had his number

Source: http://uk.tv.ign.com/articles/118/1183201p1.html

Indeed it does. :) Looks like this is set to become the storyline of the year. CM Punk's definitely gotta get a PWI Award this year.

The Cena vs Punk match should get MoTY. I don't know if he could win 'Feud of the Year' because who would be the 'opponent'? McMahon? Cena? WWE? 'Everyone'?

The Cena vs Punk match should get MoTY. I don't know if he could win 'Feud of the Year' because who would be the 'opponent'? McMahon? Cena? WWE? 'Everyone'?

I think it would be WWE. :p It could happen; last year's Most Hated Superstar of the Year was all the members of the Nexus (the original, not the New Nexus).

I think it would be WWE. :p It could happen; last year's Most Hated Superstar of the Year was all the members of the Nexus (the original, not the New Nexus).

I guess it would have to be WWE. Who's most hated this year? Michael Cole? I realize it could come from anywhere, but just picking WWE it would be hard. So many tweeners.

I guess it would have to be WWE. Who's most hated this year? Michael Cole?

I suppose he would be eligible, seeing as he's actually wrestled at two PPVs this year. :p Failing that, maybe Alberto Del Rio? Hulk Hogan and Eric Bischoff came fourth last year; personally, I'd give them the award, seeing as TNA's still on a downward spiral. I saw a bit of last week's episode; Brother Ray, sorry, Bully Ray is in a suit, Mr. Anderson is with Hogan and Bischoff now, and Sting is now a direct ripoff of The Joker. :blink: I bloody hate Vince Russo.

WWE Money in the Bank winner Daniel Bryan has posted the following on Twitter:

"Just finished a grappling session with Neil Melanson. Expect more and more submissions all the time on Friday Night Smackdown!"

Several readers have sent in word that Ric Flair has launched an online store which you can visit at RicFlair.com. Along with other items, Flair is reportedly selling five minute phone calls and live video chats for $495 and $750

^ Hmm, not a bad article, but there's so many mistakes in there...

  • The Hogan match he listed doesn't use any theme at all, let alone "Eye of the Tiger".
  • He talks about the first version of Shawn Michaels' theme, and he posts the sixth version. He then claims they eventually worked out the kinks in the theme by 1994, when that theme has remained unchanged since 1993.
  • He calls Edge's last theme "On This Day", and thinks it's an original WWE song, when it's pretty common knowledge that Alter Bridge created the song, and it's called "Metalingus"

And contrary to what he says, Bret Hart and Mr. Kennedy's themes do not suck! :p

And now for something completely different, I stumbled across this...

^ Hmm, not a bad article, but there's so many mistakes in there...

  • The Hogan match he listed doesn't use any theme at all, let alone "Eye of the Tiger".
  • He talks about the first version of Shawn Michaels' theme, and he posts the sixth version. He then claims they eventually worked out the kinks in the theme by 1994, when that theme has remained unchanged since 1993.
  • He calls Edge's last theme "On This Day", and thinks it's an original WWE song, when it's pretty common knowledge that Alter Bridge created the song, and it's called "Metalingus"

He's an ESPN analyst, can't expect perfection. But Michael's theme was changed over the years. Not sure if it was 93/94, but it originally had different vocals (Sherri, I think)

He's an ESPN analyst, can't expect perfection. But Michael's theme was changed over the years. Not sure if it was 93/94, but it originally had different vocals (Sherri, I think)

Yep, the fifth theme (the original "Sexy Boy") uses Sensational Sherri's vocals throught the entire song. This was in '92 and '93, then in '93, it changed to a different version where Shawn Michaels did most of the vocals (but Sherri is still present in the chorus), and he's used that exact same theme with no alterations since 1993, except for the time when he was owned by JBL, in which case, he used JBL's theme instead. :p

Yeah but he came out with his belt, and a new theme song (Cult of Personality lol). Not sure how they are going to spin it, other than HHH hiring him back etc.

Also, Jim Ross back on commentary YAY! Jim Morrison is back, R-Truth is totally going insane. Interesting.

Jim Morrison is back?!?!? Holy **** that's amazing!!!! ;)

Very good Raw overall. Besides the worthless Mysterio winning the title for 90 minutes that is. JR back, Zack Ryder with a Win, Punk back... Great HHH vs R Truth segment.... Worst part? I hope Cult of Personality was a one-off. This Fire Burns is much better.

I hope Cult of Personality was a one-off. This Fire Burns is much better.

As much as I love "Cult of Personality", I'm guessing it's only temporary, being used to rib Cena, because a cult of personality is someone who uses propaganda or mass media to create an idealised and heroic public image (thank you Wikipedia), and that description fits John Cena a lot more than it fits CM Punk. CM Punk's got a similar image nowadays, but that's mostly down to the fans, whereas Cena's is simply down to WWE.

Overall, a great episode of RAW. Triple H and R-Truth bickering was funny, Michael Cole doing Triple H's entrance was hilarious! The only bad part of the show was that beer ad for... I don't even remember what it was called now. Oh wait, Keystone Beer. That was painfully unfunny and even more painfully scripted, and to top it off, a little "please drink responsibly" notice at the bottom. So much for PG, eh? :p WWE might as well bump up the age rating now; we've gone way beyond PG over the past few months. Ass this, ass that, b****rd, and even douche***, which is how they bleeped it. Only in America where if they bleep a swear, the bleep out the least worst part of it, lika ass****. Prime example coming up courtesy of the

.

Right, enough of that, let's kick back, listen to Living Colour again, and reminisce that epic moment at the end. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!