Recommended Posts

It was too f***ing obvious. :/ He's also won $1,000 from CM Punk for pointing at the WrestleMania sign.

yes he did XD punk said it

my guess on rock vs punk: 1 name MADDOX! ;)

And damn, Rock gets winded fasttttttt. I mean I know he's way older now than a decade ago, and he wrestles about as often as Undertaker does, but still he's in great shape physically.

Also, it would have been so awesome if

The Shield came out and beat down Punk, lettting Rock win that way and turning Rock heel. Oh man, that could have been a great swerve.

I was thinking when they talked about how long CM Punk has had the title. Has anyone stopped to think that maybe CM Punk wanted to lose tonight? Maybe take some time off. Wrestling everyday for that long has got to be exhausting. Sucks that Rock was the one to take it but as soon as Cena won I knew.

Unless Punk wins it back at EC, it's most definitely already set up as Rock vs. Cena at WM for the title. Unless Ziggler cashes at some point?

just did some reading... :

"it has earned him a chance to challenge for the title of his choosing"

Yup rock vs Cena 2

According to PWInsider.com, Brock Lesnar has signed a new, two year deal with WWE that will see Lesnar remain under contract with the company through WrestleMania 31.

Lesnar's current WWE deal was set to expire after WrestleMania 29.

It'll be interesting to see who else they put him up against besides Triple H.

I don't think it was The Shield who attacked Rock. I think it was Maddox, this will be revealed and the title will go back to Punk.

Meh /care

If they plan to go down that route, then it is going to crash and burn in spectacular fashion, thanks to a little invention called the camera...

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

I will say this, might as well give the title Santa he comes but once a year, stupid ending to RR

and as for Cena well I AM DONE, we knew it yes but at least do something inventive Vince

I said it last year. The only good reason for Rock winning at 28 was for Cena to beat him at 29.

I said it last year. The only good reason for Rock winning at 28 was for Cena to beat him at 29.

Yeah still utter bs, I remember when I was used to watch the wrestling years ago like 6/7 years ago when RR was unpredictable and you never knew who was favourite to win...but now its just sad

don't think here will be a rock vs cena 2, winning the RR gave him a shot for the World title at WM

LOL, wut?

The RR winner gets to pick what title he goes for. And that will be the WWE Championship.

Also: Hopefully The Rock brings out a new title design.

Yeah still utter bs, I remember when I was used to watch the wrestling years ago like 6/7 years ago when RR was unpredictable and you never knew who was favourite to win...but now its just sad

It was only this year it was predictable. Who had Sheamus last year or ADR the year before? No one. Get over it. He's the goddamn face of the company. If you want someone that is ready to replace him - besides Sheamus - name them. There isn't anyone yet. There are people that can get there - but no one is ready yet. And like it or not, but the 'face' has to be an American. That eliminates Barrett, Cesaro, and even Sheamus from being A #1 top of the list in WWE.

Yes, Cena beats Rock this year at WM. Yes, Cena will win A LOT this year. They are playing up the same storyline as AJ Styles in TNA. The redemption year.

This is what happens to heels. They get their comeuppance eventually. He had a long title reign. He moves on to the Undertaker for WrestleMania. Hell of a parting gift, a WM match with the phenom. More prestigious, IMO, than the WWE title match.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

    • earlcaulley
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!