Recommended Posts

In a last-minute effort to boost viewership of tonight’s Night of Champions event, World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) matchmakers have added Seth Rollins to every bout.

Rollins was already scheduled to compete in two matches — one against John Cena, the other against rookie sensation Sting — which would have been a tall order in itself.

But WWE executive Hunter Hearst Helmsley announced at a press conference this morning that, in keeping with “what’s best for business,” the Night of Champions card has been thus revised:

  • Neville and The Lucha Dragons (with Seth Rollins portraying Sin Cara) against Stardust and The Ascension
  • Seth Rollins vs. John Cena for the Divas Championship
  • Seth Rollins vs. Sting for the WCW Television Title
  • Seth Rollins vs. Nikki Bella vs. Charlotte in a triple-threat lingerie pillow fight
  • The Shield vs. The Wyatt Family
  • Seth Rollins vs. Rusev (with special guest referee Dolph Ziggler)
  • The New Day (with Seth Rollins on trombone and Xavier Woods on xylophone) vs. Bubba Ray Rollins and Devon Rollins
  • Seth Rollins vs. Seth Rollins for the IWGP Heavyweight Championship

WWE fans worldwide are expected to call the event “awesome,” and then clap five times in a syncopated rhythm.

http://www.kayfabenews.com/rollins-added-every-match-night-champions/ 

WWE just ran a promo during the WWE Night of Champions PPV show advertising Brock Lesnar’s “Go To Hell Tour”.

A voiceover featuring Paul Heyman plugged Lesnar’s WWE MSG live special appearance, and also announced he would be next month’s “Stone Cold Podcast” guest.

Finally, Heyman said Lesnar will be making his in-ring return at WWE Hell In A Cell against the Undertaker in their “rubber match” after facing each other at Wrestlemania 30 and this year’s Summerslam.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/622337-breaking-brock-lesnars-wwe-return-revealed-new-appearance-ppv-match-confirmed

Well, not happy with the PPV last night.  Heels were booked way strong all night, and 3 titles changed hands, but only after the heel beat on the face most of the match.  Charlotte was a bada$$ on NXT, but against Nikki, seems all she did was lay and cry.  Sting may have gotten legit hurt, but nothing on WWE about that yet.  Overall, disappointing.

Sting may have gotten legit hurt, but nothing on WWE about that yet.

Still nothing from WWE, but something from Dave Meltzer...

Dave Meltzer of the Wrestling Observer is reporting Sting suffered a serious neck injury during the main event of last night’s WWE Night Of Champions pay-per-view. 

According to reports, Sting suffered a legitimate and “significant” neck injury, but not much else is known at this point.

It was originally thought that Sting was injured after he was powerbombed into the turnbuckles by WWE World Heavyweight Champion Seth Rollins during the title match. Sting’s head was seen snapping back during the spot; he was later checked on by the ringside doctor, then Rollins ended up rolling him up as part of the planned finish.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/622545-update-on-sting-injury-at-wwe-night-of-champions-ppv 

 

Still nothing from WWE, but something from Dave Meltzer...

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/622545-update-on-sting-injury-at-wwe-night-of-champions-ppv 

This from WWE  http://www.wwe.com/inside/sting-injured-at-night-of-champions-2015-27955717

Sting reportedly sustained an injury Sunday night during his WWE World Heavyweight Title Match against champion Seth Rollins.

Check back with WWE.com for more details and updates on Sting's condition following Night of Champions.

So since Rollins is making a habit of hurting people a la - Sting, Cena...when are they gonna take the belt off him...its apparent hes cant take care of the face of the company nor a legend. If he just put Sting on the shelf for good i'm gonna hate him for ages...maybe im just being a salty Sting fan but the guy already lost to HHH in his first match and his only true win has been in a damn tag match...If Vince and HHH were planning on ruining Sting they managed to do it rather quickly.

So since Rollins is making a habit of hurting people a la - Sting, Cena...when are they gonna take the belt off him...its apparent hes cant take care of the face of the company nor a legend. If he just put Sting on the shelf for good i'm gonna hate him for ages...maybe im just being a salty Sting fan but the guy already lost to HHH in his first match and his only true win has been in a damn tag match...If Vince and HHH were planning on ruining Sting they managed to do it rather quickly.

 

Sting sucks.

Update on Sting from his official Facebook page...

"As many of you may already know, Sting is undergoing treatment for the injuries he sustained in last night’s match with Seth Rollins. Doctors will continue to evaluate his condition, but he is a man of remarkable health and resiliency, especially at his age and with all he’s endured throughout his stellar career. Therefore, we are optimistic he will have a speedy recovery and return to full health soon. Sting has kept his body in excellent shape, due largely to the guidance he’s received from his personal trainer Jeff Cavaliere (ATHLEAN-X), and we trust this will prove beneficial to the recovery process. As a side note, we later learned the greatest damage to his body took place before the match was over, but being the true professional he is and among the hardest workers to ever step foot in the ring, he insisted to see the match through to the end." -Steve Martinez

An absolute professional who stood by his morals for quite some time, and has always put younger talent over...

I'm sure he speaks highly of you too!

Doesn't mean he was ever a good performer. There are plenty of 'nice guys' in the business. Doesn't make them not suck.

Doesn't mean he was ever a good performer. There are plenty of 'nice guys' in the business. Doesn't make them not suck.

No, but he has been pretty much universally liked by both fans and "smarks".  Still, my definition of what "sucks" won't be defined by someone who types "_____ sucks" on a forum... 

Doesn't mean he was ever a good performer. There are plenty of 'nice guys' in the business. Doesn't make them not suck.



I'm sorry what makes him 'suck' in your eyes - i'd love to know the why you think he sucks

PWInsider.com is reporting the fan who jumped the rail and entered the ring at last Sunday’s WWE Night of Champions pay-per-view is facing jail time after pleading guilty to charges brought against him for the incident. 

Oscar Ramirez, 37, of Houston, Texas, was charged with criminal tresspassing with no forced entry; he will face ten days in jail, lighter than the 1.5 years he could have faced if the case went to trial. 

It was previously reported that WWE is looking into cracking down on fan incidents at live events, and want to issue harsher penalties for offenders, including criminal charges. Previously, WWE would usually issue lifetime bans from live events when fans entered the ring or left the seating area and hopped the barricade.

http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/623049-update-fan-who-jumped-rail-at-wwe-night-of-champions-sentenced-to-jail 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!